Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 54, Issue 8, pp 6530–6541 | Cite as

Enhanced photocatalytic activity of β-Ga2O3 nanowires by Au nanoparticles decoration

  • Jinghao Lu
  • Jie XingEmail author
  • Daimei Chen
  • Hong Xu
  • Xu Han
  • Danyang Li
Energy materials
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

Combining plasmonic noble metals with semiconductor materials has been considered to be an effective way to improve catalyst performance. In the present paper, Au nanoparticles (NPs) were decorated onto CVD-grown β-Ga2O3 nanowires (NWs) through a chemical reduction method. Different quantity of HAuCl4 solution was used to control the size and density of Au NPs. The photocatalytic activity of the Au–Ga2O3 NWs is evaluated by degrading rhodamine B (Rh B) under UV and visible light irradiation. It is found that the size and density of the Au NPs had a great influence on the photocatalytic efficiency of β-Ga2O3 NWs. And Ga2O3 NWs with Au NPs of ~ 5.7 nm size and ~ 420/μm2 density shows the best catalytic efficiency. Moreover, Au NPs attachment on the Ga2O3 could extend its photocatalytic activity towards the visible light irradiation, which is significant to efficient utilization more solar light. A jointly effect of both the interfacial Schottky potential field between Au NPs and β-Ga2O3 NWs and local surface plasma resonance excitation is proposed to contribute the enhancement effects.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11104255) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Chong M-N, Jin B, Chow CWK, Saint C (2010) Recent developments in photocatalytic water treatment technology: a review. Water Res 44:2997–3027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fu H, Pan C, Yao W, Zhu Y (2005) Visible-light-induced degradation of rhodamine B by nanosized Bi2WO6. J Phys Chem B 109:22432–22439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gaya UI, Abdullah AH (2008) Heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants over titanium dioxide: a review of fundamentals, progress and problems. J Photochem Photobiol, C 9:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yang G, Chen D, Ding H et al (2017) Well-designed 3D ZnIn2S4 nanosheets/TiO2 nanobelts as direct Z-scheme photocatalysts for CO2 photoreduction into renewable hydrocarbon fuel with high efficiency. Appl Catal B Environ 219:611–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lai Y, Meng M, Yu Y, Wang X, Ding T (2011) Photoluminescence and photocatalysis of the flower-like nano-ZnO photocatalysts prepared by a facile hydrothermal method with or without ultrasonic assistance. Appl Catal B Environ 105:335–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen D, Wang Z, Ren T, Ding H, Yao W, Zong R, Zhu Y (2014) Influence of defects on the photocatalytic activity of ZnO. J Phys Chem C 118:15300–15307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bessekhouad Y, Robert D, Weber JV (2004) Bi2S3/TiO2 and CdS/TiO2 heterojunctions as an available configuration for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutant. J Photochem Photobiol, A 163:569–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wu J, Zhang Z, Liu B, Fang Y, Wang L, Dong B (2018) UV–Vis-NIR-driven plasmonic photocatalysts with dual-resonance modes for synergistically enhancing H2 generation. Solar RRL 2:1800039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rothenberger G, Moser J, Graetzel M, Serpone N, Sharma DK (1985) Charge carrier trapping and recombination dynamics in small semiconductor particles. J Am Chem Soc 107:8054–8059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Serpone N, Lawless D, Disdier J, Herrmann JM (1994) Spectroscopic, photoconductivity, and photocatalytic studies of TiO2 colloids: naked and with the lattice doped with Cr3+, Fe3+, and V5+ cations. Langmuir 10:643–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhao B, Lv M, Zhou L (2012) Photocatalytic degradation of perfluorooctanoic acid with beta-Ga2O3 in anoxic aqueous solution. J Environ Sci 24:774–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jędrzejczyk M, Zbudniewek K, Rynkowski J, Keller V, Grams J, Ruppert AM, Keller N (2017) Wide band gap Ga2O3 as efficient UV-C photocatalyst for gas-phase degradation applications. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:26792–26805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bagheri M, Mahjoub A, Khodadadi A, Mortazavi Y (2014) Fast photocatalytic degradation of congo red using CoO-doped β-Ga2O3 nanostructures. RCS Adv 4:33262–33268Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhao B, Li X, Yang L et al (2015) β-Ga2O3 nanorod synthesis with a one-step microwave irradiation hydrothermal method and its efficient photocatalytic degradation for perfluorooctanoic acid. Photochem Photobiol 91:42–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ju M-G, Wang X, Liang W, Zhao Y, Li C (2014) Tuning the energy band-gap of crystalline gallium oxide to enhance photocatalytic water splitting: mixed-phase junctions. J Mater Chem A 2:17005–17014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hidaka H, Tsukamoto T, Mitsutsuka Y, Takamura T, Serpone N (2014) Photochemical and Ga2O3-photoassisted decomposition of the insecticide Fipronil in aqueous media upon UVC radiation. New J Chem 38:3939–3952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hou Y, Wu L, Wang X, Ding Z, Li Z, Fu X (2007) Photocatalytic performance of α-, β-, and γ-Ga2O3 for the destruction of volatile aromatic pollutants in air. J Catal 250:12–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Murray WA, Barnes WL (2007) Plasmonic materials. Adv Mater 19:3771–3782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hutter E, Fendler JH (2004) Exploitation of localized surface plasmon resonance. Adv Mater 16:1685–1706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Eustis S, El-Sayed MA (2006) Why gold nanoparticles are more precious than pretty gold: noble metal surface plasmon resonance and its enhancement of the radiative and nonradiative properties of nanocrystals of different shapes. Chem Soc Rev 35:209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ma L, Liang S, Liu X-L, Yang D-J, Zhou L, Wang Q-Q (2015) Synthesis of dumbbell-like gold-metal sulfide core-shell nanorods with largely enhanced transverse plasmon resonance in visible region and efficiently improved photocatalytic activity. Adv Funct Mater 25:898–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ye E, Regulacio MD, Zhang SY, Loh XJ, Han MY (2015) Anisotropically branched metal nanostructures. Chem Soc Rev 44:6001–6017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tee SY, Teng CP, Ye E (2017) Metal nanostructures for non-enzymatic glucose sensing. Mater Sci Eng, C 70:1018–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang S, Ren F, Wu W, Zhou J, Sun L, Xiao X, Jiang C (2014) Size effects of Ag nanoparticles on plasmon-induced enhancement of photocatalysis of Ag-α-Fe2O3 nanocomposites. J Colloid Interface Sci 427:29–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kochuveedu ST, Kim D-P, Kim DH (2012) Surface-plasmon-induced visible light photocatalytic activity of TiO2 nanospheres decorated by Au nanoparticles with controlled configuration. J Phys Chem C 116:2500–2506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tsukamoto D, Shiraishi Y, Sugano Y, Ichikawa S, Tanaka S, Hirai T (2012) Gold nanoparticles located at the interface of anatase/rutile TiO2 particles as active plasmonic photocatalysts for aerobic oxidation. J Am Chem Soc 134:6309–6315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tee SY, Ye E, Pan PH et al (2015) Fabrication of bimetallic Cu/Au nanotubes and their sensitive, selective, reproducible and reusable electrochemical sensing of glucose. Nanoscale 7:11190–11198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ye W, Sun Z, Wang C et al (2018) Enhanced O2 reduction on atomically thin Pt-based nanoshells by integrating surface facet, interfacial electronic, and substrate stabilization effects. Nano Res 11:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Homola J (2010) Surface plasmon resonance sensors for detection of chemical and biological species. Chem Rev 108:462–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tian Y, Tatsuma T (2004) Plasmon-induced photoelectrochemistry at metal nanoparticles supported on nanoporous TiO2. Chem Commun 16:1810–1811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lai CW, An J, Ong HC (2005) Surface-plasmon-mediated emission from metal-capped ZnO thin films. Appl Phys Lett 86:251105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gao H, Zhang P, Zhao J, Pan J, Hu J, Shao G (2017) Plasmon enhancement on photocatalytic hydrogen production over the Z-scheme photosynthetic heterojunction system. Appl Catal B Environ 210:297–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sun F, Qiao X, Tan F, Wang W, Qiu X (2012) One-step microwave synthesis of Ag/ZnO nanocomposites with enhanced photocatalytic performance. J Mater Sci 47:7262–7268.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-012-6676-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gao C, Chen S, Wang Y et al (2018) Heterogeneous single-atom catalyst for visible-light-driven high-turnover CO2 reduction: the role of electron transfer. Adv Mater 30:1704624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    An Y-H, Guo D-Y, Li Z-M et al (2016) Dual-band photodetector with a hybrid Au-nanoparticles/β-Ga2O3 structure. RSC Adv 6:66924–66929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sadeghi M, Liu W, Zhang T, Stavropoulos P, Levy B (1996) Role of photoinduced charge carrier separation distance in heterogeneous photocatalysis: oxidative degradation of CH3OH vapor in contact with Pt/TiO2 and cofumed TiO2-Fe2O3. J Phys Chem 100:19466–19474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Seh ZW, Liu S, Low M, Zhang S-Y, Liu Z, Mlayah A, Han M-Y (2012) Janus Au-TiO2 photocatalysts with strong localization of plasmonic near-fields for efficient visible-light hydrogen generation. Adv Mater 24:2310–2314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Varley JB, Weber JR, Janotti A, Van de Walle CG (2010) Oxygen vacancies and donor impurities in β-Ga2O3. Appl Phys Lett 97:142106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pearson A, Jani H, Kalantar-zadeh K, Bhargava SK, Bansal V (2011) Gold nanoparticle-decorated Keggin ions/TiO2 photococatalyst for improved solar light photocatalysis. Langmuir 27:6661–6667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bai S, Zhang N, Gao C, Xiong Y (2018) Defect engineering in photocatalytic materials. Nano Energy 53:296–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Govorov AO, Zhang H, Gun’Ko YK (2013) Theory of photoinjection of hot plasmonic carriers from metal nanostructures into semiconductors and surface molecules. J Phys Chem C 117:16616–16631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Liu J, Lu W, Zhong Q, Wu H, Li Y, Li L, Wang Z (2018) Effect of pH on the microstructure of β-Ga2O3 and its enhanced photocatalytic activity for antibiotic degradation. J Colloid Interface Sci 359:255–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Girija K, Thirumalairajan S, Patra AK, Mangalaraj D, Ponpandian N, Viswanathan C (2013) Organic additives assisted synthesis of mesoporous β-Ga2O3 nanostructures for photocatalytic dye degradation. Semicond Sci Technol 28:035015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Watanabe T, Takizawa T, Honda K (1977) Photocatalysis through excitation of adsorbates. 1. Highly efficient N-deethylation of rhodamine B adsorbed to cadmium sulfide. J Phys Chem 81:1845–1851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Guo X, Zhu H, Li Q (2014) Visible-light-driven photocatalytic properties of ZnO/ZnFe2O4 core/shell nanocable arrays. Appl Catal B Environ 160:408–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Liu H, Hao H, Xing J, Dong J, Zhang Z, Zheng Z, Zhao K (2016) Enhanced photocatalytic capability of zinc ferrite nanotube arrays decorated with gold nanoparticles for visible light-driven photodegradation of rhodamine B. J Mater Sci 51:5872–5879.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-9888-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Clavero C (2014) Plasmon-induced hot-electron generation at nanoparticle/metal-oxide interfaces for photovoltaic and photocatalytic devices. Nat Photonics 8:95–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Na L, Zhang Z, Yue W et al (2018) Direct evidence of IR-driven hot electron transfer in metal-free plasmonic W18O49/carbon heterostructures for enhanced catalytic H2 production. Appl Catal B Environ 233:19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zhang Z, Huang J, Fang Y, Zhang M, Liu K, Dong B (2017) A nonmetal plasmonic Z-scheme photocatalyst with UV- to NIR-driven photocatalytic protons reduction. Adv Mater 29:1606688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Zhang Z, Jiang X, Liu B et al (2018) IR-driven ultrafast transfer of plasmonic hot electrons in nonmetallic branched heterostructures for enhanced H2 generation. Adv Mater 30:1705221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hao Q, Niu X, Li X, Chen D, Ding H (2017) Enhanced photochemical oxidation ability of carbon nitride by π–π stacking interactions with graphene. Chin J Catal 38:278–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wu N (2018) Plasmonic metal–semiconductor photocatalysts and photoelectrochemical cells: a review. Nanoscale 10:2679–2696CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of SciencesChina University of GeosciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.School of Materials Science and TechnologyChina University of GeosciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations