Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 54, Issue 8, pp 6310–6322 | Cite as

Influence of tension–shear coupling on draping of plain weave fabrics

  • Yuan YaoEmail author
  • Xiongqi Peng
  • Youkun Gong
Computation and theory
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

Although tension–shear coupling of weave fabrics in large deformation has been observed in experiments, most constitutive models for weave fabrics often ignore this coupling effect for simplicity. In this paper, a nonlinear anisotropic hyperelastic constitutive model is proposed to consider this tension–shear coupling effect. Draping experiments of a plain weave fabric over a tetrahedron mold are carried out to validate the proposed coupling constitutive model. Subsequently, the influences of tension–shear coupling on draping processes are investigated. Numerical simulation results indicate that the tension–shear coupling effect significantly changes fiber reorientation during draping process, which makes shear deformation tend to be uniform and reduces the local shear deformation concentration and should not be neglected in woven fabric stamping with salient double curvatures.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The supports from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11172171) and the Ph.D. Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (No. 20130073110054) are gratefully acknowledged.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication.

References

  1. 1.
    Kashani MH, Rashidi A, Crawford BJ, Milani AS (2016) Analysis of a two-way tension–shear coupling in woven fabrics under combined loading tests: global to local transformation of non-orthogonal normalized forces and displacements. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 88:272–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cao J, Akkerman R, Boisse P et al (2008) Characterization of mechanical behavior of woven fabrics: experimental methods and benchmark results. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 39(6):1037–1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Peng XQ, Cao J (2005) A continuum mechanics-based non-orthogonal constitutive model for woven composite fabrics. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 36(6):859–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Peng XQ, Guo ZY, Du TL, Yu WR (2013) A simple anisotropic hyperelastic constitutive model for textile fabrics with application to forming simulation. Compos B Eng 52:275–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu L, Chen J, Li X, Sherwood JA (2005) Two-dimensional macro-mechanics shear models of woven fabrics. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 36(1):105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sun F, Zhang YF, Chen L, Zhang ML, Pan N (2017) Shear properties of three-dimensional woven composite reinforcements. Polym Compos 38(2):244–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hivet G, Vidal-Sallé E, Boisse P (2013) Analysis of the stress components in a textile composite reinforcement. J Compos Mater 47(3):269–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Launay J, Hivet G, Duong AV, Boisse P (2008) Experimental analysis of the influence of tensions on in plane shear behaviour of woven composite reinforcements. Compos Sci Technol 68(2):506–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Harrison P, Abdiwi F, Guo Z, Potluri P, Yu WR (2012) Characterising the shear–tension coupling and wrinkling behaviour of woven engineering fabrics. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 43(6):903–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harrison P (2012) Normalisation of biaxial bias extension test results considering shear tension coupling. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 43(9):1546–1554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nosrat-Nezami F, Gereke T, Eberdt C, Cherif C (2014) Characterisation of the shear–tension coupling of carbon-fibre fabric under controlled membrane tensions for precise simulative predictions of industrial preforming processes. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 67:131–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tavana R, Najar SS, Abadi MT, Sedighi M (2012) Meso/macro-scale finite element model for forming process of woven fabric reinforcements. J Compos Mater 47(17):2075–2085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Naouar N, Vidal-Salle E, Schneider J, Maire E, Boisse P (2015) 3D composite reinforcement meso FE analyses based on X-ray computed tomography. Compos Struct 132:1094–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jauffrès D, Sherwood JA, Morris CD, Chen J (2010) Discrete mesoscopic modeling for the simulation of woven-fabric reinforcement forming. Int J Mater Form 3(2):1205–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boisse P, Zouari B, Gasser A (2005) A mesoscopic approach for the simulation of woven fibre composite forming. Compos Sci Technol 65(3):429–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jacques S, De Baere I, Van Paepegem W (2014) Application of periodic boundary conditions on multiple part finite element meshes for the mesoscale homogenization of textile fabric composites. Compos Sci Technol 92:41–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peng XQ, Rehman ZU (2011) Textile composite double dome stamping simulation using a non-orthogonal constitutive model. Compos Sci Technol 71(8):1075–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peng XQ, Ding FF (2011) Validation of a non-orthogonal constitutive model for woven composite fabrics via hemispherical stamping simulation. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 42(4):400–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cao J, Xue P, Peng XQ, Krishnan N (2003) An approach in modeling the temperature effect in thermo-stamping of woven composites. Compos Struct 61(4):413–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Khan MA, Mabrouki T, Vidal-Sallé E, Boisse P (2010) Numerical and experimental analyses of woven composite reinforcement forming using a hypoelastic behaviour. Application to the double dome benchmark. J Mater Process Technol 210(2):378–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Aimène Y, Vidal-Sallé E, Hagège B, Sidoroff F, Boisse P (2010) A hyperelastic approach for composite reinforcement large deformation analysis. J Compos Mater 44(1):5–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee W, Cao J, Badel P, Boisse P (2008) Non-orthogonal constitutive model for woven composites incorporating tensile effect on shear behavior. Int J Mater Form 1:891–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Komeili M, Milani AS (2016) On effect of shear–tension coupling in forming simulation of woven fabric reinforcements. Compos B Eng 99:17–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gong YK, Xu P, Peng XQ, Wei R, Yao Y, Zhao KX (2018) A lamination model for forming simulation of woven fabric reinforced thermoplastic prepregs. Compos Struct 196:89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yao Y, Huang XS, Peng XQ, Liu PF, Gong YK (2017) An anisotropic hyperelastic constitutive model for woven fabric considering biaxial-tension coupling. Text Res J.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517517748495 Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Charmetant A, Vidal-Sallé E, Boisse P (2011) Hyperelastic modelling for mesoscopic analyses of composite reinforcements. Compos Sci Technol 71(14):1623–1631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gong YK, Yan DX, Yao Y, Wei R, Hu HL, Xu P, Peng XQ (2017) An anisotropic hyperelastic constitutive model with tension–shear coupling for woven composite reinforcements. Int J Appl Mech 9(6):439–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nezami FN, Gereke T, Cherif C (2016) Analyses of interaction mechanisms during forming of multilayer carbon woven fabrics for composite applications. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 84:406–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical and Automobile EngineeringShanghai University of Engineering ScienceShanghaiChina
  2. 2.School of Materials Science and EngineeringShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations