Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 54, Issue 6, pp 4637–4646 | Cite as

Bi2O3 decorated TiO2 nanotube confined Pt nanoparticles with enhanced activity for catalytic combustion of ethylene

  • Xiaoyang Wang
  • Xu Yang
  • Lei Miao
  • Jie Gao
  • Quanming Peng
  • Liangpeng Wu
  • Siyi Chen
  • Xinjun Li
Composites
  • 83 Downloads

Abstract

A novel Pt entrapped in Bi2O3 decorated TiO2 nanotube (Pt-in/Bi2O3@TNT) composite was obtained by the assistance of vacuum impregnation and subsequent calcination. Attributed to the confinement effect, TiO2 nanotube (TNT) confined Pt nanoparticles catalyst (Pt-in/TNT) processed better ethylene (C2H4) combustion activity than Pt nanoparticles loaded on TNT catalyst (Pt-out/TNT). More distinctly, the Pt-in/Bi2O3@TNT displayed enhanced activity towards C2H4 combustion, a nearly complete depletion at 150 °C was achieved, which is 30 °C lower than that of the Pt-in/TNT. The characterizations of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) not only verified that the electron density destitution of Pt in Pt-in/Bi2O3@TNT is significantly enhanced due to the modulation of layered Bi2O3 on the confinement effect of TNT, but also indicated that the catalyst facilitates the forming and migrating of active oxygen species. This work presents an efficient confinement effect combined with electron modifier strategy to construct high-performance catalysts for environmental applications.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province (Grant No. 2015GXNSFFA139002), Science and Technology Plan Project of Guangzhou City (No. 201803030019) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51772056, 51562005). The authors also gratefully acknowledge the analytical and testing center of GIEC for the testing support of this work.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

References

  1. 1.
    Shayegan Z, Lee CS, Haghighat F (2018) TiO2 photocatalyst for removal of volatile organic compounds in gas phase—a review. Chem Eng J 334:2408–2439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atkinson R, Arey J (2003) Atmospheric degradation of volatile organic compounds. Chem Rev 103:4605–4638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kamal MS, Razzak SA, Hossain MM (2016) Catalytic oxidation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs)—a review. Atmos Environ 140:117–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pu Z, Liu Y, Zhou H, Huang W, Zheng Y, Li X (2017) Catalytic combustion of lean methane at low temperature over ZrO2-modified Co3O4 catalysts. Appl Surf Sci 422:85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Qiao D, Lu G, Mao D, Yun G, Guo Y (2011) Effect of ca doping on the performance of CeO2–NiO catalysts for CH4 catalytic combustion. J Mater Sci 46:641–647.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-4786-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Spivey JJ (1987) Complete catalytic-oxidation of volatile organics. Ind Eng Chem Res 26:2165–2180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guo T, Du J, Li J (2016) The effects of ceria morphology on the properties of Pd/ceria catalyst for catalytic oxidation of low-concentration methane. J Mater Sci 51:10917–10925.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0303-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zuo S, Huang Q, Li J, Zhou R (2009) Promoting effect of Ce added to metal oxide supported on Al pillared clays for deep benzene oxidation. Appl Catal B-Environ 91:204–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huang H, Xu Y, Feng Q, Leung DYC (2015) Low temperature catalytic oxidation of volatile organic compounds: a review. Catal Sci Technol 5:2649–2669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang Z, Jiang Z, Shangguan W (2016) Low-temperature catalysis for VOCs removal in technology and application: a state-of-the-art review. Catal Today 264:270–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barakat T, Rooke JC, Cousin R, Lamonier JF, Giraudon JM, Su BL, Siffert S (2014) Investigation of the elimination of VOC mixtures over a Pd-loaded V-doped TiO2 support. New J Chem 38:2066–2074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huang S, Zhu X, Cheng B, Yu J, Jiang C (2017) Flexible nickel foam decorated with Pt/NiO nanoflakes with oxygen vacancies for enhanced catalytic formaldehyde oxidation at room temperature. Environ Sci-Nano 4:2215–2224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li J, Ma C, Xu X, Yu J, Hao Z, Qiao S (2008) Efficient elimination of trace ethylene over nano-gold catalyst under ambient conditions. Environ Sci Technol 42:8947–8951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li W, Wang J, Gong H (2009) Catalytic combustion of VOCs on non-noble metal catalysts. Catal Today 148:81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pan X, Bao X (2011) The effects of confinement inside carbon nanotubes on catalysis. Acc Chem Res 44:553–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yang X, Wu L, Ma L, Li X, Wang T, Liao S (2015) Pd nano-particles (NPs) confined in titanate nanotubes (TNTs) for hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde. Catal Commun 59:184–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yang X, Wu L, Du L, Li X (2015) Photocatalytic water splitting towards hydrogen production on gold nanoparticles (NPs) entrapped in TiO2 nanotubes. Catal Lett 145:1771–1777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yang X, Yu X, Long L, Wang T, Ma L, Wu L, Bai Y, Li X, Liao S (2014) Pt nanoparticles entrapped in titanate nanotubes (TNT) for phenol hydrogenation: the confinement effect of TNT. Chem Commun 50:2794–2796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ertl G (2001) Heterogeneous catalysis on the atomic scale. Chem Rec 1:33–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wu B, Zheng N (2013) Surface and interface control of noble metal nanocrystals for catalytic and electrocatalytic applications. Nano Today 8:168–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Xu D, Hai Y, Zhang X, Zhang S, He R (2017) Bi2O3 cocatalyst improving photocatalytic hydrogen evolution performance of TiO2. Appl Surf Sci 400:530–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ke J, Liu J, Sun H, Zhang H, Duan X, Liang P, Li X, Tade MO, Liu S, Wang S (2017) Facile assembly of Bi2O3/Bi2S3/MoS2 n-p heterojunction with layered n-Bi2O3 and p-MoS2 for enhanced photocatalytic water oxidation and pollutant degradation. Appl Catal B-Environ 200:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lu T, Du Z, Liu J, Ma H, Xu J (2013) Aerobic oxidation of primary aliphatic alcohols over bismuth oxide supported platinum catalysts in water. Green Chem 15:2215–2221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lou Y, Wang L, Zhang Y, Zhao Z, Zhang Z, Lu G, Guo Y (2011) The effects of Bi2O3 on the CO oxidation over Co3O4. Catal Today 175:610–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Li J, Wu L, Long L, Xi M, Li X (2014) Preparation of titania nanotube-Cd065Zn035S nanocomposite by a hydrothermal sulfuration method for efficient visible-light-driven photocatalytic hydrogen production. Appl Surf Sci 322:265–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ge M, Cao C, Li S, Zhang S, Deng S, Huang J, Li Q, Zhang K, Al-Deyab SS, Lai Y (2015) Enhanced photocatalytic performances of n-TiO2 nanotubes by uniform creation of p-n heterojunctions with p-Bi2O3 quantum dots. Nanoscale 7:11552–11560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chang M, Hu H, Zhang Y, Chen D, Wu L, Li X (2017) Improving visible light-absorptivity and photoelectric conversion efficiency of a TiO2 nanotube anode film by sensitization with Bi2O3 nanoparticles. Nanomaterials 7:104–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vinayan BP, Ramaprabhu S (2013) Platinum-TM (TM = Fe, Co) alloy nanoparticles dispersed nitrogen doped (reduced graphene oxide-multiwalled carbon nanotube) hybrid structure cathode electrocatalysts for high performance PEMFC applications. Nanoscale 5:5109–5118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhang H, Pan X, Liu JJ, Qian W, Wei F, Huang Y, Bao X (2011) Enhanced catalytic activity of sub-nanometer titania clusters confined inside double-wall carbon nanotubes. Chemsuschem 4:975–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pan X, Fan Z, Chen W, Ding Y, Luo H, Bao X (2007) Enhanced ethanol production inside carbon-nanotube reactors containing catalytic particles. Nat Mater 6:507–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chen W, Fan Z, Pan X, Bao X (2008) Effect of confinement in carbon nanotubes on the activity of Fischer–Tropsch iron catalyst. J Am Chem Soc 130:9414–9419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhang S, Luo W, Yang X, Lv T, Huang Y, Dong K, Li X (2017) MnO2 nanoparticles confined in TiO2 nanotubes for catalytic combustion of butane. ChemistrySelect 2:4557–4560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yao G, Wu L, Lv T, Li J, Huang Y, Dong K, Li X (2018) The effect of CuO modification for a TiO2 nanotube confined CeO2 catalyst on the catalytic combustion of butane. Open Chem 16:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS Key Laboratory of Renewable EnergyGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New and Renewable Energy Research and DevelopmentGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Guangxi Key Laboratory of Information Material, Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center of Structure and Property for New Energy and Materials, School of Material Science and EngineeringGuilin University of Electronic TechnologyGuilinPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Guangzhou Foreign Language SchoolGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations