Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 54, Issue 5, pp 3904–3913 | Cite as

Fabrication of well-isolated graphene and evaluation of thermoelectric performance of polyaniline–graphene composite film

  • Takuji Ube
  • Jun Koyanagi
  • Takahiro Kosaki
  • Kenjiro Fujimoto
  • Tomohiro Yokozeki
  • Takashi Ishiguro
  • Keishi Nishio
Composites
  • 70 Downloads

Abstract

Camphorsulfonic acid (CSA)-doped polyaniline (PANI) and thermally reduced graphene (TRGO) composite polymer film with high thermoelectric (TE) properties were fabricated. We developed a modified Hummers method with an additional ultrasonic disruption technique to obtain well-isolated TRGO powder and well-dispersed PANI–CSA–TRGO composite polymer. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) observation, electron energy-loss spectroscopy, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analyses revealed that the ultrasonic disruption process produced a well-isolated state of graphene oxide, and this state remained after a thermal reduction process. The dispersed TRGO powder was added to CSA-doped PANI composite polymer to improve its electrical conductivity (EC) properties. Addition of the well-isolated TRGO powder with high crystallinity resulted in remarkable improvement in EC without any degradation of the Seebeck coefficient (SC), which is representative of TE properties. The highest SC and EC values obtained in this study were 24 μV K−1 and 3677 S cm−1, respectively, which were observed for the 30 wt% TRGO-added PANI–CSA composite film, and the resulting power factor reached 214 μW mK−2. Well-isolated graphene with high crystallinity was fabricated using an additional ultrasonic disruption process, and well-dispersed polymer/graphene composite was also fabricated using the same sonication process. This optimized sonication process is simple but effective for improving TE properties of the composite.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Graus WHJ, Voogt M, Worrell E (2007) International comparison of energy efficiency of fossil power generation. Energy Policy 35:3936–3951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Seebeck TJ (1822) Magnetische Polarisation der Metalle und Erze durch Temperatur-Differenz, Abhandlugen der Deutschen Akademie der Wissenchaften zu Berlin, pp 265–373Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Snyder GJ, Toberer ES (2008) Complex thermoelectric materials. Nat Mater 7:105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rowe DM (1995) CRC handbook of thermoelectrics. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tritt TM (2005) Thermal conductivity: theory, properties, and applications. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nolas GS, Sharp J, Goldsmid J (2013) Thermoelectrics: basic principles and new materials developments. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Diaz AF, Logan JA (1980) Electroactive polyaniline films. J Electroanal Chem Interfac Electrochem 111:111–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shirakawa H, Louis EJ, MacDiarmid AG, Chiang CK, Heeger AJ (1977) Synthesis of electrically conducting organic polymers: halogen derivatives of polyacetylene, (CH)x. J Chem Soc Chem Commun 578–580Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    MacDiarmid AG (2001) “Synthetic Metals”: a novel role for organic polymers (nobel lecture). Angew Chem Int Ed 40:2581–2590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xuan Y, Liu X, Desbief S et al (2010) Thermoelectric properties of conducting polymers: The case of poly(3-hexylthiophene). Phys Rev B 82:115454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dubey N, Leclerc M (2011) Conducting polymers: Efficient thermoelectric materials. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys 49:467–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gao C, Chen G (2016) Conducting polymer/carbon particle thermoelectric composites: Emerging green energy materials. Compos Sci Technol 124:52–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yao Q, Chen L, Zhang W, Liufu S, Chen X (2010) Enhanced thermoelectric performance of single-walled carbon nanotubes/polyaniline hybrid nanocomposites. ACS Nano 4:2445–2451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yoo D, Kim J, Lee SH et al (2015) Effects of one- and two-dimensional carbon hybridization of PEDOT:PSS on the power factor of polymer thermoelectric energy conversion devices. J Mater Chem A 3:6526–6533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim GH, Hwang DH, Woo SI (2012) Thermoelectric properties of nanocomposite thin films prepared with poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) poly(styrenesulfonate) and graphene. Phys Chem Chem Phys 14:3530–3536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xu K, Chen G, Qiu D (2013) Convenient construction of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-graphene pie-like structure with enhanced thermoelectric performance. J Mater Chem A 1:12395–12399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yan H, Kou K (2014) Enhanced thermoelectric properties in polyaniline composites with polyaniline-coated carbon nanotubes. J Mater Sci Lett 49:1222–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hummers WS Jr, Offeman RE (1958) Preparation of graphitic oxide. J Am Chem Soc 80:1339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shahriary L, Athawale AA (2014) Graphene oxide synthesized by using modified hummers approach. Int J Renew Energ Environ Eng 2:58–63Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yang L, Wang S, Mao J et al (2013) Hierarchical MoS2/polyaniline nanowires with excellent electrochemical performance for lithium-ion batteries. Adv Mater 25:1180–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Park M-S, Wang G-X, Kang Y-M, Wexler D, Dou S-X, Liu H-K (2007) Preparation and electrochemical properties of SnO2 nanowires for application in lithium-ion batteries. Angew Chem 119:764–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cao Y, Smith P (1993) Liquid-crystalline solutions of electrically conducting polyaniline. Polymer 34:3139–3143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pan W, Yang SL, Li G, Jiang JM (2005) Electrical and structural analysis of conductive polyaniline/polyacrylonitrile composites. Eur Polymer J 41:2127–2133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chen T, Zeng B, Liu J, et al (2009) J Phys Conf. SerIOP PublishingGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shahriary L, Athawale AA (2014) Graphene oxide synthesized by using modified hummers approach. Int J Renew Energy Environ Eng 2:58–63Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kaniyoor A, Baby TT, Ramaprabhu S (2010) Graphene synthesis via hydrogen induced low temperature exfoliation of graphite oxide. J Mater Chem 20:8467–8469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chen C, Yang Q-H, Yang Y et al (2009) Self-assembled free-standing graphite oxide membrane. Adv Mater 21:3007–3011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Morimoto N, Suzuki H, Takeuchi Y et al (2017) Real-time, in situ monitoring of the oxidation of graphite: lessons learned. Chem Mater 29:2150–2156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Khan U, O’Neill A, Lotya M, De S, Coleman JN (2010) High-concentration solvent exfoliation of graphene. Small 6:864–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Adams PN, Laughlin PJ, Monkman AP, Kenwright AM (1996) Low temperature synthesis of high molecular weight polyaniline. Polymer 37:3411–3417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    He W, Zhang W, Li Y, Jing X (2012) A high concentration graphene dispersion stabilized by polyaniline nanofibers. Synth Met 162:1107–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wang L, Yao Q, Bi H, Huang F, Wang Q, Chen L (2014) Large thermoelectric power factor in polyaniline/graphene nanocomposite films prepared by solution-assistant dispersing method. J Mat Chem A 2:11107–11113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fujimoto K, Taguchi T, Yoshida S, Ito S (2014) Design of seebeck coefficient measurement probe for powder library. ACS Comb Sci 16:66–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gogotsi Y, Libera JA, Kalashnikov N, Yoshimura M (2000) Graphite polyhedral crystals. Science 290:317–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wang D-S, Chang S-Y, Chen T-S et al (2017) Stress writing textured graphite conducting wires/patterns in insulating amorphous carbon matrix as interconnects. Sci Rep 7:9727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sun L, Fugetsu B (2013) Mass production of graphene oxide from expanded graphite. Mater Lett 109:207–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pendolino F, Armata N (2017) Graphene oxide in environmental remediation process. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Martin JM, Vacher B, Ponsonnet L, Dupuis V (1996) Chemical bond mapping of carbon by image-spectrum EELS in the second derivative mode. Ultramicroscopy 65:229–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Berger SD, McKenzie DR, Martin PJ (1988) EELS analysis of vacuum arc-deposited diamond-like films. Philos Mag Lett 57:285–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Drewniak S, Muzyka R, Stolarczyk A, Pustelny T, Kotyczka-Morańska M, Setkiewicz M (2016) Studies of reduced graphene oxide and graphite oxide in the aspect of their possible application in gas sensors. Sensors 16:103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sun X, Liu Z, Welsher K et al (2008) Nano-graphene oxide for cellular imaging and drug delivery. Nano Research 1:203–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Miao J, Li H, Qiu H, Wu X, Yang J (2018) Graphene/PANI hybrid film with enhanced thermal conductivity by in situ polymerization. J Mater Sci Lett 53:8855–8865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wilson NR, Pandey PA, Beanland R et al (2009) Graphene oxide: structural analysis and application as a highly transparent support for electron microscopy. ACS Nano 3:2547–2556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Marcano DC, Kosynkin DV, Berlin JM et al (2010) Improved synthesis of graphene oxide. ACS Nano 4:4806–4814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Shen J, Hu Y, Shi M et al (2009) Fast and facile preparation of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide nanoplatelets. Chem Mater 21:3514–3520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wang L, Yao Q, Bi H, Huang F, Wang Q, Chen L (2015) PANI/graphene nanocomposite films with high thermoelectric properties by enhanced molecular ordering. J Mater Chem A 3:7086–7092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Anno Y, Takeuchi M, Matsuoka M, Takei K, Akita S, Arie T (2017) Effect of defect-induced carrier scattering on the thermoelectric power of graphene. Appl Phys Lett 110:263501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Abad B, Alda I, Diaz-Chao P et al (2013) Improved power factor of polyaniline nanocomposites with exfoliated graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs). J Mater Chem A 1:10450–10457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mitra M, Kulsi C, Chatterjee K et al (2015) Reduced graphene oxide-polyaniline composites-synthesis, characterization and optimization for thermoelectric applications. RSC Adv 5:31039–31048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wang W, Zhang Q, Li J et al (2015) An efficient thermoelectric material: preparation of reduced graphene oxide/polyaniline hybrid composites by cryogenic grinding. RSC Adv 5:8988–8995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ma T, Liu Z, Wen J et al (2017) Tailoring the thermal and electrical transport properties of graphene films by grain size engineering. Nat Commun 8:14486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Marsden AJ, Papageorgiou DG, Vallés C et al (2018) Electrical percolation in graphene–polymer composites, 2D. Materials 5:032003Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Gu J, Xie C, Li H, Dang J, Geng W, Zhang Q (2014) Thermal percolation behavior of graphene nanoplatelets/polyphenylene sulfide thermal conductivity composites. Polym Compos 35:1087–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Rakibul I, Roch C-Y-K, Jean-François B et al (2014) Transport and thermoelectric properties of polyaniline/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites. Nanotechnology 25:475705CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and TechnologyTokyo University of ScienceTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Pure and Applied ChemistryTokyo University of ScienceChibaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Aeronautics and AstronauticsUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations