Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 54, Issue 5, pp 4444–4456 | Cite as

Particle-reinforced and functionalized hydrogels for SpineMan, a soft robotics application

  • Tobias Preller
  • Gundula Runge
  • Sabrina Zellmer
  • Dirk Menzel
  • Saeid Azimi Saein
  • Jan Peters
  • Annika Raatz
  • Brigitte Tiersch
  • Joachim Koetz
  • Georg Garnweitner
Polymers
  • 119 Downloads

Abstract

SpineMan is designed as a prototype of a soft robotic manipulator that is constructed of alternating hard and soft segments similar to the human spine. Implementing such soft segments allows to surpass the rigidity of conventional robots and ensures safer workspaces where humans and machines can work side by side with less stringent safety restrictions. Therefore, we used a hydrogel as viscoelastic material consisting of poly(vinyl alcohol) and borax. The mechanical properties of the hydrogel were tailored by embedding silica particles of various particles sizes as well as in different mass fractions. Increased mass contents as well as larger particle sizes led to strongly enhanced rigidity with a more than doubled storage modulus of the composite compared to the pure hydrogel. Furthermore, specific functionalities were induced by the incorporation of superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles that can in principle be used for sensing robotic motion and detecting malfunctions. Therefore, we precisely adjusted the saturation magnetization of the soft segments using defined mass contents of the nanoparticles. To ensure long-time shape stability and prevention of atmospheric influences on the prepared composites, a silicone skin of specific shore hardness was used. The composites and the soft segments were characterized by oscillation measurements, cryo-SEM, bending tests and SQUID measurements, which give insights into the properties in the passive and in the moving state of SpineMan. The utilization of tailored composites led to highly flexible, reinforced and functional soft segments, which ensure stability, easy movability by springs of the shape memory alloy nitinol and prevention of total failure.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Bilal Temel for the TEM image and the Laboratory of Nano and Quantum Engineering (LNQE), Leibniz Universität Hannover, for the TEM instrument as well as Daniel Gurka for the illustrations of SpineMan.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10853_2018_3106_MOESM1_ESM.docx (55.6 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 56955 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Rus D, Tolley MT (2015) Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature 521(7553):467–475.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14543 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ilievski F, Mazzeo AD, Shepherd RF, Chen X, Whitesides GM (2011) Soft robotics for chemists. Angew Chem 123(8):1930–1935.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.201006464 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Majidi C (2013) Soft robotics: a perspective—current trends and prospects for the future. Soft Robot 1(1):5–11.  https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2013.0001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shepherd RF, Ilievski F, Choi W, Morin SA, Stokes AA, Mazzeo AD, Chen X, Wang M, Whitesides GM (2011) Multigait soft robot. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(51):20400–20403.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116564108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pfeifer R, Lungarella M, Iida F (2012) The challenges ahead for bio-inspired ‘soft’ robotics. Commun ACM 55(11):76–87.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2366316.2366335 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Park YL, Chen BR, Pérez-Arancibia NO, Young D, Stirling L, Wood RJ, Goldfield EC, Nagpal R (2014) Design and control of a bio-inspired soft wearable robotic device for ankle–foot rehabilitation. Bioinspir Biomim 9(1):016007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mitsunaga N, Miyashita T, Ishiguro H, Kogure K, Hagita N (2006) Robovie-IV: a communication robot interacting with people daily in an office. In: 2006 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, 9–15 Oct 2006, pp 5066–5072.  https://doi.org/10.1109/iros.2006.282594
  8. 8.
    Wehner M, Truby RL, Fitzgerald DJ, Mosadegh B, Whitesides GM, Lewis JA, Wood RJ (2016) An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots. Nature 536(7617):451–455.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mazzolai B, Mattoli V (2016) Generation soft. Nature 536:400–401.  https://doi.org/10.1038/536400a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huai-Ti L, Gary GL, Barry T (2011) GoQBot: a caterpillar-inspired soft-bodied rolling robot. Bioinspir Biomim 6(2):026007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ehrenberg R (2011) Life: robot cartwheels like a caterpillar: GoQBot curls itself up into a ball, then takes off spinning. Sci News 179(11):10.  https://doi.org/10.1002/scin.5591791110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cagdas DO, Daniela R (2013) Autonomous undulatory serpentine locomotion utilizing body dynamics of a fluidic soft robot. Bioinspir Biomim 8(2):026003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Samchenko Y, Ulberg Z, Korotych O (2011) Multipurpose smart hydrogel systems. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 168(1–2):247–262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2011.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vermonden T, Censi R, Hennink WE (2012) Hydrogels for protein delivery. Chem Rev 112(5):2853–2888.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr200157d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu L, Wang W, Ju X-J, Xie R, Chu L-Y (2010) Smart thermo-triggered squirting capsules for nanoparticle delivery. Soft Matter 6:3759–3763.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c002231d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reddy NN, Mohan YM, Varaprasad K, Ravindra S, Joy PA, Raju KM (2011) Magnetic and electric responsive hydrogel–magnetic nanocomposites for drug-delivery application. J Appl Polym Sci 122(2):1364–1375.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.34016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xia L-W, Xie R, Ju X-J, Wang W, Chen Q, Chu L-Y (2013) Nano-structured smart hydrogels with rapid response and high elasticity. Nat Commun 4:2226.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3226 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Takashima Y, Hatanaka S, Otsubo M, Nakahata M, Kakuta T, Hashidzume A, Yamaguchi H, Harada A (2012) Expansion–contraction of photoresponsive artificial muscle regulated by host–guest interactions. Nat Commun 3:1270.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2280 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee KY, Mooney DJ (2001) Hydrogels for tissue engineering. Chem Rev 101(7):1869–1880.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr000108x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Drury JL, Mooney DJ (2003) Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications. Biomaterials 24(24):4337–4351.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00340-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Taylor DL, in het Panhuis M (2016) Self-healing hydrogels. Adv Mater 28(41):9060–9093.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201601613 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tong X, Zheng J, Lu Y, Zhang Z, Cheng H (2007) Swelling and mechanical behaviors of carbon nanotube/poly(vinyl alcohol) hybrid hydrogels. Mater Lett 61(8–9):1704–1706.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2006.07.115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gaharwar AK, Peppas NA, Khademhosseini A (2014) Nanocomposite hydrogels for biomedical applications. Biotechnol Bioeng 111(3):441–453.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.25160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mpekris F, Achilleos M, Vasile E, Vasile E, Krasia-Christoforou T, Stylianopoulos T (2015) Mechanical properties of structurally-defined magnetoactive polymer (co)networks. RSC Adv 5(26):20011–20019.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra16260a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fuhrer R, Athanassiou EK, Luechinger NA, Stark WJ (2009) Crosslinking metal nanoparticles into the polymer backbone of hydrogels enables preparation of soft, magnetic field-driven actuators with muscle-like flexibility. Small 5(3):383–388.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.200801091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Runge G, Zellmer S, Preller T, Garnweitner G, Raatz A (2015) Actuation principles for the bioinspired soft robotic manipulator SpineMan. In: 2015 IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics (ROBIO), 6–9 Dec 2015, pp 1329–1336.  https://doi.org/10.1109/robio.2015.7418955
  27. 27.
    Saadat S, Salichs J, Noori M, Hou Z, Davoodi H, Bar-on I, Suzuki Y, Masuda A (2002) An overview of vibration and seismic applications of NiTi shape memory alloy. Smart Mater Struct 11(2):218–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Christopoulos A, Hristoforou E, Tsamasphyros G (2012) Strain sensing capabilities of iron/epoxy composites. Smart Mater Struct 21(8):085030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Karagiovanaki S, Zoumpoulakis L (2013) Investigation of strain sensing properties of polyester/magnetite composite materials. Key Eng Mater 543:464–467.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.543.464 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stöber W, Fink A, Bohn E (1968) Controlled growth of monodisperse silica spheres in the micron size range. J Colloid Interface Sci 26(1):62–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(68)90272-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Masthoff IC, Kraken M, Mauch D, Menzel D, Munevar JA, Baggio Saitovitch E, Litterst FJ, Garnweitner G (2014) Study of the growth process of magnetic nanoparticles obtained via the non-aqueous sol–gel method. J Mater Sci 49(14):4705–4714.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-014-8160-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Han J, Lei T, Wu Q (2014) High-water-content mouldable polyvinyl alcohol–borax hydrogels reinforced by well-dispersed cellulose nanoparticles: dynamic rheological properties and hydrogel formation mechanism. Carbohydr Polym 102:306–316.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.11.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Levental I, Georges PC, Janmey PA (2007) Soft biological materials and their impact on cell function. Soft Matter 3(3):299–306.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b610522j CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Runge G, Preller T, Zellmer S, Blankemeyer S, Kreuz M, Garnweitner G, Raatz A (2015) SpineMan: design of a soft robotic spine-like manipulator for safe human–robot interaction. In: 2015 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), 28 Sept 2015–2 Oct 2015, pp 1103–1110.  https://doi.org/10.1109/iros.2015.7353508
  35. 35.
    Fyfe CA, Blazek AI (1998) Complications in investigations of the swelling of hydrogel matrices due to the presence of trapped gas. J Control Release 52(1):221–225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-3659(97)00217-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chen SC, Wu YC, Mi FL, Lin YH, Yu LC, Sung HW (2004) A novel pH-sensitive hydrogel composed of N, O-carboxymethyl chitosan and alginate cross-linked by genipin for protein drug delivery. J Control Release 96(2):285–300.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sutar PB, Mishra RK, Pal K, Banthia AK (2008) Development of pH sensitive polyacrylamide grafted pectin hydrogel for controlled drug delivery system. J Mater Sci Mater Med 19(6):2247–2253.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-007-3162-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Grabs I-M, Bradtmöller C, Menzel D, Garnweitner G (2012) Formation mechanisms of iron oxide nanoparticles in different nonaqueous media. Cryst Growth Des 12(3):1469–1475.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cg201563h CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Preller T, Menzel D, Knickmeier S, Porsiel J, Temel B, Garnweitner G (2018) Non-aqueous sol–gel synthesis of FePt nanoparticles in the absence of in situ stabilizers. Nanomaterials.  https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8050297 Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Cheema TA, Garnweitner G (2014) Phase-controlled synthesis of ZrO2 nanoparticles for highly transparent dielectric thin films. CrystEngComm 16(16):3366–3375.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ce42392a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zimmermann M, Ibrom K, Jones PG, Garnweitner G (2016) Formation of a dimeric precursor intermediate during the nonaqueous synthesis of titanium dioxide nanocrystals. ChemNanoMat 2(12):1073–1076.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cnma.201600264 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kockmann A, Porsiel JC, Saadat R, Garnweitner G (2018) Impact of nanoparticle surface modification on the mechanical properties of polystyrene-based nanocomposites. RSC Adv 8(20):11109–11118.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ra00052b CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Particle TechnologyTechnische Universität BraunschweigBraunschweigGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Assembly TechnologyLeibniz Universität HannoverGarbsenGermany
  3. 3.Institute for Condensed Matter PhysicsTechnische Universität BraunschweigBraunschweigGermany
  4. 4.Institute of ChemistryUniversität PotsdamPotsdamGermany
  5. 5.Laboratory for Emerging Nanometrology (LENA)Technische Universität BraunschweigBraunschweigGermany

Personalised recommendations