Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 54, Issue 5, pp 4115–4123 | Cite as

Exploring the solid-state interfacial reaction of Al/Fe2O3 nanothermites by thermal analysis

  • Xiang Zhou
  • Ying Zhu
  • Xiang Ke
  • Kaili Zhang
Energy materials
  • 117 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, we use simultaneous differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis to analyze the solid-state reaction characteristics of Al/Fe2O3 nanothermites before n-Al melts. Different experimental setups for thermal analysis are compared, and the heat-release characteristics are studied on Al/Fe2O3 nanothermites in the form of powder and pellet, respectively. It is found that protection provided by mere argon flow is far from enough for thermal analysis of Al/Fe2O3 nanothermites. The experimental setup must be free of oxygen; otherwise, the determined exothermic peak is mostly the oxidation of n-Al by the residue oxygen molecules in the furnace body, due to the high reactivity and moderate accessibility of free oxygen molecules. Under proper experimental setup, it is found that besides the redox reaction between n-Al and n-Fe2O3, intermetallic reaction also occurs to form Fe4Al13. Moreover, the intermetallic reaction is more noticeable for nanothermite pellet than for nanothermite powder, and the eutectic reaction of Fe4Al13 and n-Al leads to melting peaks below 655 °C. The results indicate that instrument configuration and sample status affect the testing results to a large extent, and one should be prudent to derive reaction characteristics of nanothermites.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51706105) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (No. BK20170846).

Supplementary material

10853_2018_3094_MOESM1_ESM.docx (836 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 836 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Sundaram D, Yang V, Yetter RA (2017) Metal-based nanoenergetic materials: synthesis, properties, and applications. Prog Energy Combust Sci 61:293–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhou X, Torabi M, Lu J, Shen R, Zhang K (2014) Nanostructured energetic composites: synthesis, ignition/combustion modeling, and applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:3058–3074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Glavier L, Nicollet A, Jouot F et al (2017) Nanothermite/RDX-based miniature device for impact ignition of high explosives. Propellants Explos Pyrotech 42:308–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhou X, Wang Y, Cheng Z, Ke X, Jiang W (2017) Facile preparation and energetic characteristics of core–shell Al/CuO metastable intermolecular composite thin film on a silicon substrate. Chem Eng J 328:585–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ru C, Wang F, Xu J et al (2017) Superior performance of a MEMS-based solid propellant microthruster (SPM) array with nanothermites. Microsyst Technol 23:3161–3174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jang NS, Ha SH, Kim KH, Cho MH, Kim SH, Kim JM (2017) Low-power focused-laser-assisted remote ignition of nanoenergetic materials and application to a disposable membrane actuator. Combust Flame 182:58–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Myagkov VG, Bykova LE, Zhigalov VS et al (2017) Thermite synthesis, structural and magnetic properties of Co–Al2O3 nanocomposite films. J Alloys Compd 724:820–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lafontaine E, Comet M (2016) Nanothermites. ISTE Ltd, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dreizin EL, Schoenitz M (2015) Correlating ignition mechanisms of aluminum-based reactive materials with thermoanalytical measurements. Prog Energy Combust Sci 50:81–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marin L, Gao Y, Vallet M et al (2017) Performance enhancement via incorporation of ZnO nanolayers in energetic Al/CuO multilayers. Langmuir 33:11086–11093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ke X, Zhou X, Gao H et al (2018) Surface functionalized core/shell structured CuO/Al nanothermite with long-term storage stability and steady combustion performance. Mater Des 140:179–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim JH, Cho MH, Kim KJ, Kim SH (2017) Laser ignition and controlled explosion of nanoenergetic materials: the role of multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Carbon 118:268–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kinsey AH, Slusarski K, Woll K, Gibbins D, Weihs TP (2016) Effect of dilution on reaction properties and bonds formed using mechanically processed dilute thermite foils. J Mater Sci 51:5738–5749.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-9876-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhu Y, Zhou X, Xu J et al (2018) In situ preparation of explosive embedded CuO/Al/CL20 nanoenergetic composite with enhanced reactivity. Chem Eng J 354:885–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marin L, Warot-Fonrose B, Esteve A, Chabal YJ, Alfredo Rodriguez L, Rossi C (2016) Self-organized Al2Cu nanocrystals at the interface of aluminum-based reactive nanolaminates to lower reaction onset temperature. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:13104–13113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang T, Ma Z, Li G, Luo Y (2017) A new strategy for the fabrication of high performance reactive microspheres via energetic polyelectrolyte assembly. RSC Adv 7:904–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yan N, Qin L, Hao H, Hui L, Zhao F, Feng H (2017) Iron oxide/aluminum/graphene energetic nanocomposites synthesized by atomic layer deposition: enhanced energy release and reduced electrostatic ignition hazard. Appl Surf Sci 408:51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Williams RA, Schoenitz M, Ermoline A, Dreizin EL (2014) Low-temperature exothermic reactions in fully-dense Al/MoO3 nanocomposite powders. Thermochim Acta 594:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Padhye R, Smith DK, Korzeniewski C, Pantoya ML (2017) Tailoring surface conditions for enhanced reactivity of aluminum powders with solid oxidizing agents. Appl Surf Sci 402:225–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xu D, Yang Y, Cheng H, Li YY, Zhang K (2012) Integration of nano-Al with Co3O4 nanorods to realize high-exothermic core–shell nanoenergetic materials on a silicon substrate. Combust Flame 159:2202–2209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhou X, Xu D, Yang G et al (2014) Highly exothermic and superhydrophobic Mg/fluorocarbon core/shell nanoenergetic arrays. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:10497–10505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhao N, He C, Liu J et al (2014) Dependence of catalytic properties of Al/Fe2O3 thermites on morphology of Fe2O3 particles in combustion reactions. J Solid State Chem 219:67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Qin L, Yan N, Li J, Hao H, Zhao F, Feng H (2017) Enhanced energy performance from core–shell structured Al@Fe2O3 nanothermite fabricated by atomic layer deposition. RSC Adv 7:7188–7197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sui H, Atashin S, Wen JZ (2016) Thermo-chemical and energetic properties of layered nano-thermite composites. Thermochim Acta 642:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang T, Ma Z, Li G, Wang Z, Zhao B, Luo Y (2016) Electrostatic interactions for directed assembly of high performance nanostructured energetic materials of Al/Fe2O3/multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT). J Solid State Chem 237:394–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhou X, Ke X, Jiang W (2016) Aluminum/copper oxide nanostructured energetic materials prepared by solution chemistry and electrophoretic deposition. RSC Adv 6:93863–93866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ke X, Zhou X, Hao G, Xiao L, Liu J, Jiang W (2017) Rapid fabrication of superhydrophobic Al/Fe2O3 nanothermite film with excellent energy-release characteristics and long-term storage stability. Appl Surf Sci 407:137–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liu P, Li X, Cheng L, Zhu X, Li Y, Song D (2018) Preparation and characterization of n-Al/FeF3 nanothermite. Chem Eng J 331:850–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gedevanishvili S, Deevi SC (2002) Processing of iron aluminides by pressureless sintering through Fe + Al elemental route. Mater Sci Eng A 325:163–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li X, Scherf A, Heilmaier M, Stein F (2016) The Al-rich part of the Fe–Al phase diagram. J Phase Equilib Diffus 37:162–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sundman B, Ohnuma I, Dupin N, Kattner UR, Fries SG (2009) An assessment of the entire Al–Fe system including D03 ordering. Acta Mater 57:2896–2908CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Special Superfine Powder Engineering Research Center of ChinaNanjing University of Science and TechnologyNanjingChina
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringCity University of Hong KongKowloonHong Kong

Personalised recommendations