Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 54, Issue 1, pp 823–839 | Cite as

Characterization of SLM-fabricated Inconel 718 after solid solution and precipitation hardening heat treatments

  • Wakshum M. TuchoEmail author
  • Vidar Hansen
Metals

Abstract

The microstructure and hardness of solid solution heat treated (ST) and precipitation hardened Inconel 718 parts fabricated with selective laser melting are investigated. The temperature range for the ST is between 970 and 1250 °C, while the two-step precipitation hardening was done at 760 and 650 °C, each for 10 h. The result demonstrates the effects of homogenization and consequently the effects of aging on the microstructure and hardness of the samples studied. Complete recrystallization occurred for the specimens ST at and higher than 1180 °C. The grain structures of ST specimens qualitatively appear identical with those specimens ST and aged, implying that aging does not induce noticeable changes in the grain structures. Precipitation hardening generates uniformly distributed good yield of ellipsoidal γ″ precipitates with average size of minor and major axis of 11–17 nm and 48–81 nm, respectively. In addition, smaller quantities of γ′ precipitates with an average size of 24 nm are observed for the aged specimens. Increasing the hold time of ST for a particular temperature leads to coarsening of γ″ precipitates, which have a negative impact on the hardness of the material. After aging, the hardness of the specimens is increased by 32–43% relative to that of the as-printed specimen. The increments in hardness for the specimens ST at and lower than 1100 °C (and aged) are the result of the combined effects of hardening precipitates and strain associated with the lattice defects, such as dislocation networks and subgrain boundaries that remain undissolved. The microstructures of the specimens ST at higher temperatures (e.g., 1250 °C) have attained minimal lattice defects due to completed recrystallization. Hence, the increment in hardness for these specimens after aging is mainly due to the hardening precipitates. Needle-shaped δ phase is also precipitated along/near grain boundaries during solid solution heat treatment at 970 °C. Formation of δ phase can consume a lot of Nb, which otherwise be used for the precipitation of hardening phases.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Eivind Strømland and Tor Nordheim from PROMET for supplying the samples.

References

  1. 1.
    Radavich JF (1989) The physical metallurgy of cast and wrought alloy 718. In: Superalloy 718-metallurgy and applications, pp 229–240Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dehmas M, Lacaze J, Niang A, Viguier B (2011) TEM study of high-temperature precipitation of delta phase in Inconel 718 alloy. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2011:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Slama C, Abdellaoui M (2000) Structural characterization of the aged Inconel 718. J Alloys Compd 306:277–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sundararaman M, Mukhopadhyay P, Banerjee S (1992) Some aspects of the precipitation of metastable intermetallic phases in inconel 718. Metall Trans A 23A:2015–2027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cozar R, Pineau A (1973) Morphology of y’ and y” precipitates and thermal stability of inconel 718 type alloys. Metall Trans 4:47–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tucho WM, Cuvillier P, Sjolyst-Kverneland A, Hansen V (2017) Microstructure and hardness studies of Inconel 718 manufactured by selective laser melting before and after solution heat treatment. Mater Sci Eng A 689:220–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    ASTM F3055-14a (2014) Standard specification for additive manufacturing nickel alloy (UNS N07718) with Powder Bed Fusion. www.astm.org
  8. 8.
    Slama C, Servant C, Cizeron G (1997) Aging of the Inconel 718 alloy between 500 and 750 °C. J Mater Res 12(09):2298–2316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tucho WM, Lysne VH, Austbø H, Sjolyst-Kverneland A, Hansen V (2018) Investigation of effects of process parameters on microstructure and hardness of SLM manufactured SS316L. J Alloys Compd 740:910–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dubiel B, Kruk A, Stepniowska E, Cempura G, Geiger D, Formanek P, Hernandez J, Midgley P, Czyrska-Filemonowicz A (2009) TEM, HRTEM, electron holography and electron tomography studies of gamma’ and gamma’’ nanoparticles in Inconel 718 superalloy. J Microsc 236(2):149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hong SJ, Chen WP, Wang TW (2001) A diffraction study of the γ″ phase in Inconel 718 superalloy. Metall Mater Trans A 32A:1887–1901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Paulonis DF, Oblak JM, Duvall DS (1969) Precipitation in nickel-base alloy 718. Trans Amer Soc Metal 62:611–622Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Agnoli A, Bernacki M, Logé R, Franchet J-M, Laigo J, Bozzolo N (2015) Selective growth of low stored energy grains during δ sub-solvus annealing in the Inconel 718 nickel-based superalloy. Metall Mater Trans A 46(9):4405–4421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang D, Niu W, Cao X, Liu Z (2015) Effect of standard heat treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of selective laser melting manufactured Inconel 718 superalloy. Mater Sci Eng A 644:32–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Choi HS, Choi J (1972) Precipitation in 718 alloys. J Korean Nucl Soc 4(3):203–213Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Popovich VA, Borisov EV, Popovich AA, Sufiiarov VS, Masaylo DV, Alzina L (2017) Impact of heat treatment on mechanical behaviour of Inconel 718 processed with tailored microstructure by selective laser melting. Mater Des 131:12–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Structural Engineering and Materials Science, Faculty of Science and TechnologyUniversity of StavangerStavangerNorway

Personalised recommendations