Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 53, Issue 20, pp 14350–14360 | Cite as

Carbon encapsulation of elemental nanoparticles by spark discharge

  • Pelin Livan
  • Tayfur ÖztürkEmail author


A study was carried out on the carbon encapsulation of a number of elements using a spark discharge generator. The study showed that elements W, V, Ti, and Si formed carbides which were encapsulated successfully by graphitic layers forming a sound core–shell structure. Copper formed a partially filled core–shell structure, attributed to its relatively low condensation temperature, where considerable shrinkage seemed to have occurred after the encapsulation. Mg could not be encapsulated in a core–shell form but rather yielded an embedded structure where Mg is condensed onto already condensed carbonaceous material. Analysis of current observations coupled with those already reported data imply a simple mechanism for encapsulation. Metals/compounds that are solid above the condensation temperature of carbon give rise to a sound core–shell structure. Elements whose condensation temperature is less than that of carbon could still produce core–shell particles but they may be partially filled. It is estimated that the process of graphitic encapsulation may be complete around 1900 K and partially filled core–shell structure might develop depending on the volume shrinkage upon cooling to room temperature. Elements/compounds whose condensation temperature is below the encapsulation temperature fail to develop core–shell structure. Instead, they form embedded composite structure.



The work reported in this paper was carried out within EU FP7 ERAfrica program—the Project HENERGY. The support was provided by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) with Project No. 114M128, which the authors gratefully acknowledge.


  1. 1.
    Swihart MT (2003) Vapor-phase synthesis of nanoparticles. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 8:127–133. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee S, Hong J, Koo JH (2013) Synthesis of few-layered graphene nanoballs with copper cores using solid carbon source. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5(7):2432–2437. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fernández Y, Menéndez JA, Phillips J, Luhrs C (2009) Graphitic encapsulation of micron- and nano-sized Ni particles using ethylene as precursor. Appl Surf Sci 256(1):194–201. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang H, Liang C, Liu J (2013) The formation of onion-like carbon-encapsulated cobalt carbide core/shell nanoparticles by the laser ablation of metallic cobalt in acetone. Carbon 55:108–115. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moskon J, Dominko R, Cerc-Korosec R (2007) Morphology and electrical properties of conductive carbon coatings for cathode materials. J Power Sources 174(2):683–688. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fronczak M, Łabędź O, Kaszuwara W, Bystrzejewski M (2018) Corrosion resistance studies of carbon-encapsulated iron nanoparticles. J Mater Sci 53:3805–3816. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guo YG, Hu JS, Wan LJ (2008) Nanostructured materials for electrochemical energy conversion and storage devices. Adv Mater 20(15):2878–2887. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li Y, Wu J, Chopra N (2015) Nano-carbon-based hybrids and heterostructures: progress in growth and application for lithium-ion batteries. J Mater Sci 50:7843–7865. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Teki R, Datta MK, Krishnan R, Parker CT, Lu TM, Kumta PN, Korathar N (2009) Nanostructured silicon anodes for lithium ion rechargeable batteries. Small 5(20):2236–2242. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zuo X, Zhu J, Müller-Buschbaum P, Cheng YJ (2017) Silicon based lithium-ion battery anodes: a chronicle perspective review. Nano Energy 31:113–143. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rahman MA, Song G, Bhatt AI, Wong CY, Wen C (2016) Nanostructured silicon anodes for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. Adv Funct Mater. Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang C, Song H, Liu C, Liu Y, Zhang C, Nan X, Cao G (2015) Fast and reversible Li ion insertion in carbon-encapsulated Li3VO4 as anode for lithium-ion battery. Adv Funct Mater. Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bian J, Li Q, Huang C, Guo Y, Zaw M, Zhang RQ (2015) A durable surface-enhanced Raman scattering substrate: ultrathin carbon layer encapsulated Ag nanoparticle arrays on indium–tin-oxide glass. Phys Chem Chem Phys 17:14849–14855. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li X, Meduri P, Chen X, Qi W, Engelhard MH, Xu W, Liu J (2012) Hollow core–shell structured porous Si–C nanocomposites for Li-ion battery anodes. J Mater Chem 22(22):11014. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bystrzejewski M, Huczko A, Lange H (2005) Arc plasma route to carbon-encapsulated magnetic nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Sens Actuators B Chem 109(1):81–85. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Byeon JH, Park JH, Yoon KY, Hwang J (2009) Ambient spark generation to synthesize carbon-encapsulated metal nanoparticles in continuous aerosol manner. Nanoscale 1(3):339. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xiaomin W, Bingshe X, Husheng J, Xuguang L, Hideki I (2006) HRTEM and Raman study of onion-like fullerenes encapsulated Fe. J Phys Chem Solids 67(4):871–874. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bystrzejewski M, Károly Z, Szépvölgyi J, Huczko A, Lange H (2011) Continuous synthesis of controlled size carbon-encapsulated iron nanoparticles. Mater Res Bull 46(12):2408–2417. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bystrzejewski M, Karoly Z, Szepvolgyi J, Kaszuwara W, Huczko A, Lange H (2009) Continuous synthesis of carbon-encapsulated magnetic nanoparticles with a minimum production of amorphous carbon. Carbon 47(8):2040–2048. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Abdullaeva Z, Omurzak E, Iwamoto C, Ihara H, Ganapathy HS, Sulaimankulova S, Mashimo T (2013) Pulsed plasma synthesis of iron and nickel nanoparticles coated by carbon for medical applications. Jpn J Appl Phys. Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kang J, Kim Y, Kim H, Hu X, Saito N, Choi J, Lee M (2016) In-situ one-step synthesis of carbon-encapsulated naked magnetic metal nanoparticles conducted without additional reductants and agents. Sci Rep. Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jiao J, Seraphin S (1998) Carbon encapsulated nanoparticles of Ni, Co, Cu, and Ti. J Appl Phys 83(5):2442–2448. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Byeon JH, Kim J (2010) Morphology and structure of aerosol carbon-encapsulated metal nanoparticles from various ambient metal−carbon spark discharges. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2(4):947–951. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tomita M, Saito Y, Hayashi T (1993) LaC2 encapsulated in graphite nano-particle. Jpn J Appl Phys 32:280–282. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Saito Y, Okuda M, Yoshikawa T, Kasuya A, Nishina Y (1994) Correlation between volatility of rare-earth metals and encapsulation of their carbides in carbon nanocapsules. J Phys Chem 98(27):6696–6698. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Seraphin S, Zhou D, Jiao J (1996) Filling the carbon nanocages. J Appl Phys 80(4):2097–2104. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Elliott BR, Host JJ, Dravid VP, Teng MH, Hwang J (1997) A descriptive model linking possible formation mechanisms for graphite-encapsulated nanocrystals to processing parameters. J Mater Res 12(12):3328–3344. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Feng J, Guo X, Ramlawi N, Pfeiffer TV, Geutjens R, Basak S, Schmidt-Ott A (2016) Green manufacturing of metallic nanoparticles: a facile and universal approach to scaling up. J Mater Chem A 4(29):11222–11227. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tabrizi NS, Ullmann M, Vons VA, Lafont U, Schmidt-Ott A (2008) Generation of nanoparticles by spark discharge. J Nanopart Res 11(2):315–332. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zeng M, Tan L, Wang J, Chen L, Rümmeli MH, Fu L (2014) Liquid metal: an innovative solution to uniform graphene films. Chem Mater 26(12):3637–3643. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Saito Y (1996) Nanoparticles and filled nanocapsules. Carbon Nanotubes. Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mchenry ME, Majetich SA, Artman JO, Degraef M, Staley SW (1994) Superparamagnetism in carbon-coated Co particles produced by the Kratschmer carbon arc process. Phys Rev B 49(16):11358–11363. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Aktekin B, Eyövge C, Öztürk T (2017) Carbon coating of magnesium particles. J Alloy Compd 720:17–21. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Assael MJ, Kalyva AE, Antoniadis KD, Banish RM, Egry I, Wu J, Wakeham WA (2010) Reference data for the density and viscosity of liquid copper and liquid tin. J Phys Chem Ref Data 39(3):033105. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ENDAM, Center for Energy Materials and Storage DevicesMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Metallurgical and Materials EngineeringMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations