Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 53, Issue 20, pp 14299–14310 | Cite as

Improved thermal conductivity of polydimethylsiloxane/short carbon fiber composites prepared by spatial confining forced network assembly

  • Xiaoxiang He
  • Yao Huang
  • Ying Liu
  • Xiuting Zheng
  • Semen Kormakov
  • Jingyao SunEmail author
  • Jian Zhuang
  • Xiaolong GaoEmail author
  • Daming WuEmail author
Composites

Abstract

Traditional compounding method is a common way to construct network to improve thermal conductivity (TC) of polymeric composites. However, the TC of the composites increases slowly when the network has been constructed. There is no percolation threshold in TC, unlike in electrical conductivity. Thus, a method of spatial confining forced network assembly (SCFNA) was used to prepare polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)/short carbon fiber (SCF) composites to improve the TC. The content of SCF ranging from 2 to 18 wt% was used to illustrate availability of SCFNA method. When the content of SCF was 18 wt%, the TC of PDMS/SCF composites prepared by SCFNA method increased by 7.79 times over the TC of PDMS/SCF composites prepared by traditional compounding method and 10.93 times over the TC of pure PDMS. Comparing the SEM of PDMS/SCF composites prepared by SCFNA method with that prepared by traditional compounding method, the gap between fillers of former was much smaller than that of latter. Moreover, the gap decreased when compression ratio increased. Therefore, the TC of composites prepared by SCFNA method could be improved significantly compared with traditional methods, which provides the possibility to replace thermally conductive materials such as metal with polymeric composites.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51673020) and by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant Nos. ZY1812, JD1810).

References

  1. 1.
    Kashfipour M, Mehra N, Zhu J (2018) A review on the role of interface in mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties of polymer composites. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-018-0022-9 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lin J, Chen X, Chen C et al (2018) Durably antibacterial and bacterially antiadhesive cotton fabrics coated by cationic fluorinated polymers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:6124–6136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hu Z, Shao Q, Huang Y et al (2018) Light triggered interfacial damage self-healing of poly(p-phenylene benzobisoxazole) fiber composites. Nanotechnology.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/aab010 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li Y, Zhou B, Zheng G et al (2018) Continuously prepared highly conductive and stretchable SWNT/MWNT synergistically composited electrospun thermoplastic polyurethane yarns for wearable sensing. J Mater Chem C 6:2258–2269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sun K, Fan R, Zhang X et al (2018) An overview of metamaterials and their achievements in wireless power transfer. J Mater Chem C 6:2925–2943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hu Z, Shao Q, Xu X, Zhang D, Huang Y (2017) Surface initiated grafting of polymer chains on carbon nanotubes via one-step cycloaddition of diarylcarbene. Compos Sci Technol 142:294–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    He Y, Yang S, Liu H et al (2018) Reinforced carbon fiber laminates with oriented carbon nanotube epoxy nanocomposites: magnetic field assisted alignment and cryogenic temperature mechanical properties. J Colloid Interf Sci 517:40–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang X, Liu X, Yuan H et al (2018) Non-covalently functionalized graphene strengthened poly(vinyl alcohol). Mater Design 139:372–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gu J, Dong W, Tang Y et al (2017) Ultralow dielectric, fluoride-containing cyanate ester resins with improved mechanical properties and high thermal and dimensional stabilities. J Mater Chem C 5:6929–6936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sha L, Chen Z, Chen Z, Zhang A, Yang Z (2016) Polylactic acid based nanocomposites: promising safe and biodegradable materials in biomedical field. Int J Polym Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6869154 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen Z, Zhang A, Yang Z, Wang X, Chang L, Chen Z, Lee L (2016) Application of DODMA and derivatives in cationic nanocarriers for gene delivery. Curr Org Chem 20:1813–1819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xie J, Teng L, Yang Z, Zhou C, Liu Y, Yung B, Lee R (2013) A polyethylenimine-linoleic acid conjugate for antisense oligonucleotide delivery. Biomed Res Int.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/710502 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ngo IL, Jeon S, Byon C (2016) Thermal conductivity of transparent and flexible polymers containing fillers: a literature review. Int J Heat Mass Tran 98:219–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guo Y, Xu G, Yang X et al (2018) Significantly enhanced and precisely modeled thermal conductivity in polyimide nanocomposites with chemically modified graphene via in situ polymerization and electrospinning-hot press technology. J Mater Chem C 6:3004–3015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhong S, Zhou Z, Zhang K et al (2016) Formation of thermally conductive networks in isotactic polypropylene/hexagonal boron nitride composites via “Bridge Effect” of multi-wall carbon nanotubes and graphene nanoplatelets. RSC Adv 6:98571–98580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhu Z, Wang P, Lv P et al (2017) Densely packed polymer/boron nitride composite for superior anisotropic thermal conductivity. Polym Compos.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.24615 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Feng C, Bai L, Bao R, Liu Z, Yang M, Chen J, Yang W (2018) Electrically insulating POE/BN elastomeric composites with high through-plane thermal conductivity fabricated by two-roll milling and hot compression. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 1:160–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dang TML, Kim CY, Zhang Y, Yang J, Masaki T, Yoon D (2017) Enhanced thermal conductivity of polymer composites via hybrid fillers of anisotropic aluminum nitride whiskers and isotropic spheres. Compos Part B-Eng 114:237–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yu GC, Wu LZ, Feng LJ, Yang W (2016) Thermal and mechanical properties of carbon fiber polymer-matrix composites with a 3D thermal conductive pathway. Compos Struct 149:213–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tian B, Yang W, Luo L et al (2016) Synergistic enhancement of thermal conductivity for expanded graphite and carbon fiber in paraffin/EVA form-stable phase change materials. Sol Energy 127:48–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    King JA, Via MD, King ME, Miskioglu I, Bogucki GR (2011) Electrical and thermal conductivity and tensile and flexural properties: comparison of carbon black/polycarbonate and carbon nanotube/polycarbonate resins. J Appl Polym Sci 121:2273–2281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yin B, Wen Y, Jia H, Wang J, Xu Z, Ding L (2017) Synergistic effects of hybridization of carbon black and carbon nanotubes on the mechanical properties and thermal conductivity of a rubber blend system. J Polym Eng 37:785–794Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yoo Y, Lee H, Ha S, Jeon B, Won J, Lee S (2013) Effect of graphite and carbon fiber contents on the morphology and properties of thermally conductive composites based on polyamide 6. Polym Int 63:151–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhou S, Chen Y, Zou H, Liang M (2013) Thermally conductive composites obtained by flake graphite filling immiscible Polyamide 6/Polycarbonate blends. Thermochim Acta 566:84–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    EI-Brolossy T, Ibrahim S, Alkhudhayr E (2015) Carbon nanotube functionalization effects on thermal properties of multiwall carbon nanotube/polycarbonate composites. Polym Compos 36:1242–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kim H, Jang J, Yu J, Kim S (2015) Thermal conductivity of polymer composites based on the length of multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Compos Part B-Eng 79:505–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wu Z, Gao S, Chen L et al (2017) Electrically insulated epoxy nanocomposites reinforced with synergistic core-shell SiO2@MWCNTs and montmorillonite bifillers. Macromol Chem Phys.  https://doi.org/10.1002/macp.201700357 Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chen Z, Zhang A, Wang X, Zhu J, Fan Y, Yu H, Yang Z (2017) The advances of carbon nanotubes in cancer diagnostics and therapeutics. J Nanomater.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3418932 Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kim H, Bae H, Yu J, Kim S (2016) Thermal conductivity of polymer composites with the geometrical characteristics of graphene nanoplatelets. Sci Rep 6:26825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tibbetts G, Lake M, Strong K, Rice B (2007) A review of the fabrication and properties of vapor-grown carbon nanofiber/polymer composites. Compos Sci Technol 67:1709–1718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yin L, Zhou X, Yu J, Wang H, Ran C (2016) Fabrication of a polymer composite with high thermal conductivity based on sintered silicon nitride foam. Compos Part A-Appl S 90:626–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Huang H, Liu C, Yang W, Fan S (2005) Aligned carbon nanotube composite films for thermal management. Adv Mater 17:1652–1656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhao M, Meng L, Ma L et al (2018) Layer-by-layer grafting CNTs onto carbon fibers surface for enhancing the interfacial properties of epoxy resin composites. Compos Sci Technol 154:28–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chen L, Hou X, Song N, Shi L, Ding P (2018) Cellulose/graphene bioplastic for thermal management: enhanced isotropic thermally conductive property by three-dimensional interconnected graphene aerogel. Compos Part A Appl S 107:189–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hu J, Huang Y, Yao Y et al (2017) Polymer composite with improved thermal conductivity by constructing a hierarchically ordered three-dimensional interconnected network of BN. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:13544–13553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mazov I, Burmistrov I, Il’Inykh I, Stepashkin A, Kuznetsov D, Issi J (2015) Anisotropic thermal conductivity of polypropylene composites filled with carbon fibers and multiwall carbon nanotubes. Polym Compos 36:1951–1957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yu A, Ramesh P, Itkis M, Bekyarova E, Haddon R (2007) Graphite nanoplatelet-epoxy composite thermal interface materials. J Phys Chem C 111:7565–7569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Qi L, Guo Y, Li W et al (2014) Ultrahigh thermal conductivity of assembled aligned multilayer graphene/epoxy composite. Chem Mater 26:4459–4465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Huxtable S, Cahill D, Shenogin S et al (2003) Interfacial heat flow in carbon nanotube suspensions. Nat Mater 2:731–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nan C, Liu G, Lin Y, Li M (2004) Interface effect on thermal conductivity of carbon nanotube composites. Appl Phys Lett 85:3549–3551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zhao J, Wu L, Zhang C, Shao Q, Guo Z, Zhang L (2017) Overview of polymer nanocomposites: computer simulation understanding of physical properties. Polymer 133:272–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhou W (2011) Effect of coupling agents on the thermal conductivity of aluminum particle/epoxy resin composites. J Mater Sci 46:3883–3889.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-5309-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Muratov D, Kuznetsov D, Il’inykh I, Burmistrov I, Mazov I (2015) Thermal conductivity of polypropylene composites filled with silane-modified hexagonal BN. Compos Sci Technol 111:40–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wu D, Gao X, Sun J et al (2017) Spatial confining forced network assembly for preparation of high-performance conductive polymeric composites. Compos Part A-Appl S 102:88–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gao X, Huang Y, Liu Y, Kormakov S, Zheng X, Wu D, Wu D (2017) Improved electrical conductivity of PDMS/SCF composite sheets with bolting cloth prepared by a spatial confining forced network assembly method. RSC Adv 7:14761–14768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sun K, Xie P, Wang Z et al (2017) Flexible polydimethylsiloxane/multi-walled carbon nanotubes membranous metacomposites with negative permittivity. Polymer 125:50–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Cui X, Zhu G, Pan Y et al (2018) Polydimethylsiloxane-titania nanocomposite coating: fabrication and corrosion resistance. Polymer 138:203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wu D, Sun J, Liu Y, Yang Z, Xu H, Zheng X, Gou P (2017) Rapid fabrication of microstructure on PMMA substrate by the plate to plate Transition-Spanning isothermal hot embossing method nearby glass transition temperature. Polym Eng Sci 57:268–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sun J, Wu D, Liu Y, Dai L, Jiang C (2017) Numerical simulation and experimental study of filling process of micro prism by isothermal hot embossing in solid-like state. Adv Polym Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adv.21815 Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Liu H, Huang W, Yang X et al (2016) Organic vapor sensing behaviors of conductive thermoplastic polyurethane–graphene nanocomposites. J Mater Chem C 4:4459–4469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Liu H, Dong M, Huang W et al (2017) Lightweight conductive graphene/thermoplastic polyurethane foams with ultrahigh compressibility for piezoresistive sensing. J Mater Chem C 5:73–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hu L, Li Y, Dai K et al (2016) Electrically conductive thermoplastic elastomer nanocomposites at ultralow graphene loading levels for strain sensor applications. J Mater Chem C 4:157–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hu C, Li Z, Wang Y (2017) Comparative assessment of the strain-sensing behaviors of polylactic acid nanocomposites: reduced graphene oxide or carbon nanotubes. J Mater Chem C 5:2318–2328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Sun J, Zhuang J, Jiang H, Huang Y, Zheng X, Liu Y, Wu D (2017) Thermal dissipation performance of metal-polymer composite heat exchanger with V-shape microgrooves: a numerical and experimental study. Appl Therm Eng 121:492–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Zhuang J, Huang C, Zhou G et al (2016) Influence of factors on heat dissipation performance of composite metal–polymer heat exchanger with rectangular microstructure. Appl Therm Eng 102:1473–1480CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Mechanical and Electrical EngineeringBeijing University of Chemical TechnologyBeijingChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Organic–Inorganic CompositesBeijing University of Chemical TechnologyBeijingChina
  3. 3.Polymer Material Processing Equipment Engineering Research Center of the Ministry of EducationBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations