Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 53, Issue 17, pp 12641–12649 | Cite as

A sustainable adsorbent for phosphate removal: modifying multi-walled carbon nanotubes with chitosan

  • Yimin Huang
  • Xinqing Lee
  • Matteo Grattieri
  • Florika C. Macazo
  • Rong Cai
  • Shelley D. Minteer
Polymers

Abstract

Phosphorus, a major culprit for eutrophication of aquatic environments, is dissolved in water primarily in the form of phosphate; hence, it is difficult to remove, and different materials are being investigated, aiming at high removal capabilities. Meanwhile, recovery capability must also be considered, since phosphorus present in wastewater may serve as a potential alternative resource for the mineral phosphorus. Carbon nanotubes are promising for the treatment of phosphate pollution; however, studies about their removal potential are limited. Herein, multi-walled carbon nanotubes were modified with chitosan through simply cross-linking to obtain a novel adsorbent for phosphate removal. Our data show that a maximum adsorption as high as 36.1 ± 0.3 mg P g−1 was achieved in 30 min at pH 3 and 293 K. The adsorption capacity of the composite (chitosan/multi-walled carbon nanotubes) could be maintained at 94–98% even after 5 adsorption–desorption cycles. An exothermic process was obtained, according to the Freundlich isotherm model. Based on the reported performance, the composite has a great advantage compared with other novel adsorbents for phosphate removal, indicating that the composite is a highly potential material to treat phosphorus-induced eutrophication of water bodies.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the State Scholarship Fund sponsored by the China Scholarship Council (Y. H.), National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1612441), Sino-Israeli Intergovernmental Scientific and Technological Cooperation Project (2015DFG92450), and the 2014 Cooperative Project Between the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Xinjiang Autonomous Region (X.L.). The authors would also like to thank the United States National Science Foundation, under award number 1561427 (M.G., F.C.M., and S.D.M.), for financial support.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10853_2018_2494_MOESM1_ESM.docx (37 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 37 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Qin K, Li F, Xu S, Wang T, Liu C (2017) Sequential removal of phosphate and cesium by using zirconium oxide: a demonstration of designing sustainable adsorbents for green water treatment. Chem Eng J 322:275–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Khalil AM, Eljamal O, Amen TW, Sugihara Y, Matsunaga N (2017) Optimized nano-scale zero-valent iron supported on treated activated carbon for enhanced nitrate and phosphate removal from water. Chem Eng J 309:349–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vaccari DA (2009) Phosphorus: a looming crisis. Sci Am 300:54–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Oladoja NA, Ahmad AL, Adesina OA, Adelagun ROA (2012) Low-cost biogenic waste for phosphate capture from aqueous system. Chem Eng J 209:170–179.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.07.125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu Q, Hu P, Wang J, Zhang L, Huang R (2016) Phosphate adsorption from aqueous solutions by Zirconium (IV) loaded cross-linked chitosan particles. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 59:311–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ramasahayam SK, Guzman L, Gunawan G, Viswanathan T (2014) A comprehensive review of phosphorus removal technologies and processes. J Macromol Sci A 51:538–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Qiu H, Liang C, Yu J, Zhang Q, Song M, Chen F (2017) Preferable phosphate sequestration by nano-La (III)(hydr) oxides modified wheat straw with excellent properties in regeneration. Chem Eng J 315:345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grattieri M, Shivel ND, Sifat I, Bestetti M, Minteer SD (2017) Sustainable hypersaline microbial fuel cells: inexpensive recyclable polymer supports for carbon nanotube conductive paint anodes. Chemsuschem 10:2053–2058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Minteer SD, Liaw BY, Cooney MJ (2007) Enzyme-based biofuel cells. Curr Opin Biotechnol 18:228–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bandodkar AJ, Wang J (2016) Wearable biofuel cells: a review. Electroanalysis 28:1188–1200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Macazo FC, Hickey DP, Abdellaoui S, Sigman MS, Minteer SD (2017) Polymer-immobilized, hybrid multi-catalyst architecture for enhanced electrochemical oxidation of glycerol. Chem Commun 53:10310–10313.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CC05724E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pillay K, Cukrowska EM, Coville NJ (2009) Multi-walled carbon nanotubes as adsorbents for the removal of parts per billion levels of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solution. J Hazard Mater 166:1067–1075.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.12.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kumar ASK, Jiang S-J, Tseng W-L (2015) Effective adsorption of chromium (VI)/Cr (III) from aqueous solution using ionic liquid functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes as a super sorbent. J. Mater. Chem. A 3:7044–7057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mahdavi S, Akhzari D (2016) The removal of phosphate from aqueous solutions using two nano-structures: copper oxide and carbon tubes. Clean Technol Environ Policy 18:817–827.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-1058-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huang Y, Lee X, Macazo FC, Grattieri M, Cai R, Minteer SD (2018) Fast and efficient removal of chromium (VI) anionic species by a reusable chitosan-modified multi-walled carbon nanotube composite. Chem Eng J 339:259–267.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.01.133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bhaumik M, Agarwal S, Gupta VK, Maity A (2016) Enhanced removal of Cr (VI) from aqueous solutions using polypyrrole wrapped oxidized MWCNTs nanocomposites adsorbent. J Colloid Interface Sci 470:257–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sowmya A, Meenakshi S (2013) An efficient and regenerable quaternary amine modified chitosan beads for the removal of nitrate and phosphate anions. J Environ Chem Eng 1:906–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cui G, Liu M, Chen Y, Zhang W, Zhao J (2016) Synthesis of a ferric hydroxide-coated cellulose nanofiber hybrid for effective removal of phosphate from wastewater. Carbohyd Polym 154:40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yoon S-Y, Lee C-G, Park J-A et al (2014) Kinetic, equilibrium and thermodynamic studies for phosphate adsorption to magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Chem Eng J 236:341–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lalley J, Han C, Mohan GR et al (2015) Phosphate removal using modified Bayoxide® E33 adsorption media. Environ Sci Water Res Technol 1:96–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hu J, Chen C, Zhu X, Wang X (2009) Removal of chromium from aqueous solution by using oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes. J Hazard Mater 162:1542–1550.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ho YS, McKay G (1999) Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochem 34:451–465.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00112-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang J, Pan K, He Q, Cao B (2013) Polyacrylonitrile/polypyrrole core/shell nanofiber mat for the removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solution. J Hazard Mater 244:121–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.11.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lu J, Xu K, Yang J, Hao Y, Cheng F (2017) Nano iron oxide impregnated in chitosan bead as a highly efficient sorbent for Cr (VI) removal from water. Carbohyd Polym 173:28–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.05.070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sowmya A, Meenakshi S (2014) A novel quaternized chitosan–melamine–glutaraldehyde resin for the removal of nitrate and phosphate anions. Int J Biol Macromol 64:224–232.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.11.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rajeswari A, Amalraj A, Pius A (2015) Removal of phosphate using chitosan–polymer composites. J Environ Chem Eng 3:2331–2341.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2015.08.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bhaumik M, Agarwal S, Gupta VK, Maity A (2016) Enhanced removal of Cr (VI) from aqueous solutions using polypyrrole wrapped oxidized MWCNTs nanocomposites adsorbent. J Colloid Interface Sci 470:257–267.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2016.02.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Boparai HK, Joseph M, O’Carroll DM (2011) Kinetics and thermodynamics of cadmium ion removal by adsorption onto nano zerovalent iron particles. J Hazard Mater 186:458–465.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jiang H, Chen P, Luo S, Tu X, Cao Q, Shu M (2013) Synthesis of novel nanocomposite Fe3O4/ZrO2/chitosan and its application for removal of nitrate and phosphate. Appl Surf Sci 284:942–949.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.04.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li C-J, Zhang S-S, Wang J-N, Liu T-Y (2014) Preparation of polyamides 6 (PA6)/Chitosan@ FexOy composite nanofibers by electrospinning and pyrolysis and their Cr (VI)-removal performance. Catal Today 224:94–103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2013.11.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rashid M, Price NT, Pinilla MÁG, O’Shea KE (2017) Effective removal of phosphate from aqueous solution using humic acid coated magnetite nanoparticles. Water Res 123:353–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of GeochemistryChinese Academy of ScienceGuiyangChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Departments of Chemistry and Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations