Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 53, Issue 16, pp 11253–11264 | Cite as

Fabrication of superhydrophobic coating from non-fluorine siloxanes via a one-pot sol–gel method

  • Xiaodan Chen
  • Yufang Chen
  • Tao JinEmail author
  • Li He
  • Yu Zeng
  • Qian Ma
  • Na Li
Chemical routes to materials

Abstract

To fabricate a superhydrophobic and durable coating, non-fluorine siloxane solution for the coating was successfully synthesized via a facile one-pot method. The wetting properties and morphology of coatings with different concentration and adding time of additives were studied. Under condition of low water content, the coatings’ superhydrophobicity was improved with the increasing amount of ammonia content, water content, and low-surface-energy material (HTMS) content. However, too more ammonia or water or HTMS would sacrifice the coating’s integrality and lead to the cracking of it. The obtained coatings showed good superhydrophobicity and anti-UV property on plain and even curved substrates, including glass, metal, and polymer. Contact angle and sliding angle of the coating could reach 158° and 1.8°, respectively. What is more, coating on PET filter could be used for oil/water separation with an efficiency of 80%.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 11378 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (MP4 9805 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (MP4 16144 kb)

Supplementary material 4 (MP4 12004 kb)

Supplementary material 5 (MP4 11837 kb)

10853_2018_2348_MOESM6_ESM.mp4 (598 kb)
Supplementary material 6 (MP4 597 kb)
10853_2018_2348_MOESM7_ESM.docx (1.8 mb)
Supplementary material 7 (DOCX 1837 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Wang S, Jiang L (2007) Definition of superhydrophobic states. Adv Mater 19(21):3423–3424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Marmur A (2004) The lotus effect: superhydrophobicity and metastability. Langmuir 20(9):3517–3519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang Y, Xue J, Wang Q, Chen Q, Ding J (2013) Verification of icephobic/anti-icing properties of a superhydrophobic surface. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5(8):3370–3381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang Z, Li Q, She Z, Chen F, Li L (2012) Low-cost and large-scale fabrication method for an environmentally-friendly superhydrophobic coating on magnesium alloy. J Mater Chem 22(9):4097–4105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xiu Y, Hess DW, Wong CP (2008) UV and thermally stable superhydrophobic coatings from sol–gel processing. J Colloid Interface Sci 326(2):465–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tian Y, Guo K, Bian X, Sun J (2017) Durable and room-temperature curable superhydrophobic composite coating on nitrocellulose lacquer. Surf Coat Technol 325:444–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ju J, Xiao K, Yao X, Bai H, Jiang L (2013) Bioinspired conical copper wire with gradient wettability for continuous and efficient fog collection. Adv Mater 25(41):5937–5942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zimmermann J, Reifler FA, Schrade U, Artus GRJ, Seeger S (2007) Long term environmental durability of a superhydrophobic silicone nanofilament coating. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 302(1–3):234–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen K, Zhou S, Yang S, Wu L (2015) Fabrication of all-water-based self-repairing superhydrophobic coatings based on UV-responsive microcapsules. Adv Funct Mater 25(7):1035–1041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zheng S, Li C, Fu Q et al (2016) Development of stable superhydrophobic coatings on aluminum surface for corrosion-resistant, self-cleaning, and anti-icing applications. Mater Des 93:261–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Su B, Tian Y, Jiang L (2016) Bioinspired interfaces with superwettability: from materials to chemistry. J Am Chem Soc 138(6):1727–1748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Blossey R (2003) Self-cleaning surfaces—virtual realities. Nat Mater 2(5):301–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Feng X, Jiang L (2006) Design and creation of superwetting/antiwetting surfaces. Adv Mater 18(23):3063–3078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gao L, McCarthy TJ (2006) The “lotus effect” explained: two reasons why two length scales of topography are important. Langmuir 22(7):2966–2967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yan YY, Gao N, Barthlott W (2011) Mimicking natural superhydrophobic surfaces and grasping the wetting process: a review on recent progress in preparing superhydrophobic surfaces. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 169(2):80–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Deng X, Mammen L, Butt H-J, Vollmer D (2012) Candle soot as a template for a transparent robust superamphiphobic coating. Science 335(6064):67–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang L, Wu J, Wang Y, Long Y, Zhao N, Xu J (2012) Combination of bioinspiration: a general route to superhydrophobic particles. J Am Chem Soc 134(24):9879–9881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Du X, Liu X, Chen H, He J (2009) Facile fabrication of raspberry-like composite nanoparticles and their application as building blocks for constructing superhydrophilic coatings. J Phys Chem C 113(21):9063–9070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cortese B, D’Amone S, Manca M, Viola I, Cingolani R, Gigli G (2008) Superhydrophobicity due to the hierarchical scale roughness of PDMS surfaces. Langmuir 24(6):2712–2718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lv T, Cheng Z, Zhang E, Kang H, Liu Y, Jiang L (2016) Self-restoration of superhydrophobicity on shape memory polymer arrays with both crushed microstructure and damaged surface chemistry. Small 13(4):1503402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li F, Du M, Zheng Q (2016) Dopamine/silica nanoparticle assembled, microscale porous structure for versatile superamphiphobic coating. ACS Nano 10(2):2910–2921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Koch K, Bhushan B, Jung YC, Barthlott W (2009) Fabrication of artificial Lotus leaves and significance of hierarchical structure for superhydrophobicity and low adhesion. Soft Matter 5(7):1386–1393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ma M, Mao Y, Gupta M, Gleason KK, Rutledge GC (2005) Superhydrophobic fabrics produced by electrospinning and chemical vapor deposition. Macromolecules 38(23):9742–9748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lu X, Wang C, Wei Y (2009) One-dimensional composite nanomaterials: synthesis by electrospinning and their applications. Small 5(21):2349–2370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wu L, Li L, Li B, Zhang J, Wang A (2015) Magnetic, durable, and superhydrophobic polyurethane@Fe3O4@SiO2@fluoropolymer sponges for selective oil absorption and oil/water separation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7(8):4936–4946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pereira C, Alves C, Monteiro A et al (2011) Designing novel hybrid materials by one-pot co-condensation: from hydrophobic mesoporous silica nanoparticles to superamphiphobic cotton textiles. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3(7):2289–2299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li F, Du M, Zheng Z, Song Y, Zheng Q (2015) A facile, multifunctional, transparent, and superhydrophobic coating based on a nanoscale porous structure spontaneously assembled from branched silica nanoparticles. Adv Mater Interfaces 2(13):1500201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhu T, Cai C, Guo J, Wang R, Zhao N, Xu J (2017) Ultra water repellent polypropylene surfaces with tunable water adhesion. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(11):10224–10232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Xie Q, Xu J, Feng L et al (2004) Facile creation of a super-amphiphobic coating surface with bionic microstructure. Adv Mater 16(4):302–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Osborne JH (2001) Observations on chromate conversion coatings from a sol–gel perspective. Prog Org Coat 41(4):280–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Poovarodom S, Hosseinpour D, Berg JC (2008) Effect of particle aggregation on the mechanical properties of a reinforced organic–inorganic hybrid sol–gel composite. Ind Eng Chem Res 47(8):2623–2629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Simpson JT, Hunter SR, Aytug T (2015) Superhydrophobic materials and coatings: a review. Rep Prog Phys 78(8):086501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bayer I (2017) On the durability and wear resistance of transparent superhydrophobic coatings. Coatings 7(12):12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stöber W, Fink A, Bohn E (1968) Controlled growth of monodisperse silica spheres in the micron size range. J Colloid Interface Sci 26(1):62–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Diré S, Babonneau F, Sanchez C, Livage J (1992) Sol–gel synthesis of siloxane oxide hybrid coatings [Si(CH3)2O·MOX–M=Si, Ti, Zr, Al] with luminescent properties. J Mater Chem 2(2):239–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Crivello JV, Mao Z (1997) Synthesis of novel multifunctional siloxane oligomers using sol–gel techniques and their photoinitiated cationic polymerization. Chem Mater 9(7):1554–1561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Buckley AM, Greenblatt M (1994) The sol–gel preparation of silica gels. J Chem Edu 71(7):599–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Guangzhou Institute of ChemistryChinese Academy of SciencesGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Guangzhou CAS Test Technical Services Co., LtdGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations