Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 53, Issue 14, pp 10147–10159 | Cite as

Flexible electrospun MWCNTs/Ag3PO4/PAN ternary composite fiber membranes with enhanced photocatalytic activity and stability under visible-light irradiation

  • Xiao-Qiong Wu
  • Jiang-Shan Shen
  • Fei Zhao
  • Zai-Dong Shao
  • Lu-Bin Zhong
  • Yu-Ming Zheng


Semiconductor photocatalysis is a promising technology for removing contaminants from water. Particularly, visible-light photocatalysis has attracted much attention because of its potential to utilize solar energy. However, nano-sized visible-light-driven photocatalysts easily aggregate during water treatment. Besides, it is difficult to recycle them from treated systems. Therefore, it is of great importance to develop visible-light-responsive immobilized photocatalysts with high activity. In this work, MWCNTs/Ag3PO4/polyacrylonitrile (PAN) ternary composite fiber membranes (TCFMs) with good photocatalytic performance were fabricated by electrospinning technique combined with in situ Ag3PO4 forming reaction. Due to the addition of MWCNTs, the band gap of MWCNTs/Ag3PO4/PAN TCFMs became narrower than that of Ag3PO4/PAN binary composite fiber membranes (BCFMs), which made MWCNTs/Ag3PO4/PAN TCFMs be able to use light at longer wavelengths. Compared with Ag3PO4/PAN BCFMs, the as-prepared MWCNTs/Ag3PO4/PAN TCFMs showed enhanced photocatalytic activity and stability for degrading rhodamine B (RhB) in batch processing systems, which mainly ascribed to fast electron transfer from Ag3PO4 to MWCNTs and the resulting high electron–hole (e–h+) separation efficiency. Radical trapping experiments revealed that holes (h+) and superoxide radicals (·O2) played primary roles in RhB degradation. In addition, the flexible MWCNTs/Ag3PO4/PAN TCFMs also showed potential practical application in the continuous wastewater treatment by a suitable photocatalytic membrane reactor. This work provides a facile approach to prepare flexible supported photocatalytic membrane with visible-light response, high activity and good stability.



The authors acknowledge the financial support received from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51578525, 5153000136 and 21507124), and the Hundred Talents Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Supplementary material

10853_2018_2334_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.4 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1461 kb)


  1. 1.
    Ong W-J, Tan L-L, Ng YH, Yong S-T, Chai S-P (2016) Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4)-based photocatalysts for artificial photosynthesis and environmental remediation: are we a step closer to achieving sustainability? Chem Rev 116:7159–7329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mateo D, Esteve-Adell I, Albero J, Royo JFS, Primo A, Garcia H (2016) 111 oriented gold nanoplatelets on multilayer graphene as visible light photocatalyst for overall water splitting. Nat Commun 7:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhao X, Qu J, Liu H, Hu C (2007) Photoelectrocatalytic degradation of triazine-containing azo dyes at γ-Bi2MoO6 film electrode under visible light irradiation (λ > 420 Nm). Environ Sci Technol 41:6802–6807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li Y, Tang Z, Zhang J, Zhang Z (2016) Reduced graphene oxide three-dimensionally wrapped WO3 hierarchical nanostructures as high-performance solar photocatalytic materials. Appl Catal A Gen 522:90–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yao W, Zhang B, Huang C, Ma C, Song X, Xu Q (2012) Synthesis and characterization of high efficiency and stable Ag3PO4/TiO2 visible light photocatalyst for the degradation of methylene blue and rhodamine B solutions. J Mater Chem 22:4050–4055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee KM, Lai CW, Ngai KS, Juan JC (2016) Recent developments of zinc oxide based photocatalyst in water treatment technology: a review. Water Res 88:428–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu B, Li Z, Xu S, Han D, Lu D (2014) Enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activities of Ag3PO4/MWCNT nanocomposites fabricated by facile in situ precipitation method. J Alloys Compd 596:19–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Martin DJ, Liu G, Moniz SJ, Bi Y, Beale AM, Ye J, Tang J (2015) Efficient visible driven photocatalyst, silver phosphate: performance, understanding and perspective. Chem Soc Rev 44:7808–7828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yi Z, Ye J, Kikugawa N, Kako T, Ouyang S, Stuart-Williams H, Yang H, Cao J, Luo W, Li Z, Liu Y, Withers RL (2010) An orthophosphate semiconductor with photooxidation properties under visible-light irradiation. Nat Mater 9:559–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen Z, Wang W, Zhang Z, Fang X (2013) High-efficiency visible-light-driven Ag3PO4/AgI photocatalysts: Z-scheme photocatalytic mechanism for their enhanced photocatalytic activity. J Phys Chem C 117:19346–19352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Teng W, Li X, Zhao Q, Chen G (2013) Fabrication of Ag/Ag3PO4/TiO2 heterostructure photoelectrodes for efficient decomposition of 2-chlorophenol under visible light irradiation. J Mater Chem A 1:9060–9068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen X, Dai Y, Wang X (2015) Methods and mechanism for improvement of photocatalytic activity and stability of Ag3PO4: a review. J Alloys Compd 649:910–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bi Y, Hu H, Ouyang S, Jiao Z, Lu G, Ye J (2012) Selective growth of Ag3PO4 submicro-cubes on Ag nanowires to fabricate necklace-like heterostructures for photocatalytic applications. J Mater Chem 22:14847–14850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hu H, Jiao Z, Wang T, Ye J, Lu G, Bi Y (2013) Enhanced photocatalytic activity of Ag/Ag3PO4 coaxial hetero-nanowires. J Mater Chem A 1:10612–10616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peng W-C, Wang X, Li X-Y (2014) The synergetic effect of MoS2 and graphene on Ag3PO4 for its ultra-enhanced photocatalytic activity in phenol degradation under visible light. Nanoscale 6:8311–8317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    He Y, Zhang L, Teng B, Fan M (2015) New application of Z-scheme Ag3PO4/g-C3N4 composite in converting CO2 to fuel. Environ Sci Technol 49:649–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bu Y, Chen Z (2014) Role of polyaniline on the photocatalytic degradation and stability performance of the polyaniline/silver/silver phosphate composite under visible light. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:17589–17598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tang C, Liu E, Wan J, Hu X, Fan J (2016) Co3O4 nanoparticles decorated Ag3PO4 tetrapods as an efficient visible-light-driven heterojunction photocatalyst. Appl Catal B Environ 181:707–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Katsumata H, Sakai T, Suzuki T, Kaneco S (2014) Highly efficient photocatalytic activity of g-C3N4/Ag3PO4 hybrid photocatalysts through Z-scheme photocatalytic mechanism under visible light. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:8018–8025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    You M, Pan J, Chi C, Wang B, Zhao W, Song C, Zheng Y, Li C (2018) The visible light hydrogen production of the Z-Scheme Ag3PO4/Ag/g-C3N4 nanosheets composites. J Mater Sci 53:1978–1986. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Xu L, Huang W-Q, Wang L-L, Huang G-F, Peng P (2014) Mechanism of superior visible-light photocatalytic cctivity and stability of hybrid Ag3PO4/graphene nanocomposite. J Phys Chem C 118:12972–12979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yang X, Cui H, Li Y, Qin J, Zhang R, Tang H (2013) Fabrication of Ag3PO4-graphene composites with highly efficient and stable visible light photocatalytic performance. ACS Catal 3:363–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang H, Huang H, Ming H, Li H, Zhang L, Liu Y, Kang Z (2012) Carbon quantum dots/Ag3PO4 complex photocatalysts with enhanced photocatalytic activity and stability under visible light. J Mater Chem 22:10501–10506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xu H, Wang C, Song Y, Zhu J, Xu Y, Yan J, Song Y, Li H (2014) CNT/Ag3PO4 composites with highly enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity and stability. Chem Eng J 241:35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Xiang Q, Lang D, Shen T, Liu F (2015) Graphene-modified nanosized Ag3PO4 photocatalysts for enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity and stability. Appl Catal B Environ 162:196–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ma J, Chen C, Yu F (2016) Self-regenerative and self-enhanced smart graphene/Ag3PO4 hydrogel adsorbent under visible light. New J Chem 40:3208–3215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ma J, Liu Q, Zhu L, Zou J, Wang K, Yang M, Komarneni S (2016) Visible light photocatalytic activity enhancement of Ag3PO4 dispersed on exfoliated bentonite for degradation of rhodamine B. Appl Catal B Environ 182:26–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Xu JW, Gao ZD, Han K, Liu Y, Song YY (2014) Synthesis of magnetically separable Ag3PO4/TiO2/Fe3O4 heterostructure with enhanced photocatalytic performance under visible light for photoinactivation of bacteria. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:15122–15131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Li G, Mao L (2012) Magnetically separable Fe3O4–Ag3PO4 sub-micrometre composite: facile synthesis, high visible light-driven photocatalytic efficiency, and good recyclability. RSC Adv 2:5108–5111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ma J, Zou J, Li L, Yao C, Kong Y, Cui B, Zhu R, Li D (2014) Nanocomposite of attapulgite–Ag3PO4 for Orange II photodegradation. Appl Catal B Environ 144:36–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yu H, Jiao Z, Hu H, Lu G, Ye J, Bi Y (2013) Fabrication of Ag3PO4–PAN composite nanofibers for photocatalytic applications. CrystEngComm 15:4802–4805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yu H, Dong Q, Jiao Z, Wang T, Ma J, Lu G, Bi Y (2014) Ion exchange synthesis of PAN/Ag3PO4 core–shell nanofibers with enhanced photocatalytic properties. J Mater Chem A 2:1668–1671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Panthi G, Park S-J, Chae S-H, Kim T-W, Chung H-J, Hong S-T, Park M, Kim H-Y (2017) Immobilization of Ag3PO4 nanoparticles on electrospun PAN nanofibers via surface oximation: bifunctional composite membrane with enhanced photocatalytic and antimicrobial activities. J Ind Eng Chem 45:277–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Liu J, Zhou P, Zhang L, Ma Z, Liang J, Fong H (2009) Thermo-chemical reactions occurring during the oxidative stabilization of electrospun polyacrylonitrile precursor nanofibers and the resulting structural conversions. Carbon 47:1087–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ungár T (2004) Microstructural parameters from X-ray diffraction peak broadening. Scr Mater 51:777–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhao Z-P, Li J, Chen J, Chen C-X (2005) Nanofiltration membrane prepared from polyacrylonitrile ultrafiltration membrane by low-temperature plasma: 2. Grafting of styrene in vapor phase. J Membr Sci 251:239–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gonzalez G, Albano C, Herman V, Boyer I, Monsalve A, Brito JA (2012) Nanocomposite building blocks of TiO2–MWCNTf and ZrO2–MWCNTf. Mater Charact 64:96–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhu M, Chen P, Liu M (2011) Graphene oxide enwrapped Ag/AgX (X = Br, Cl) nanocomposite as a highly efficient visible-light plasmonic photocatalyst. ACS Nano 5:4529–4536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhai W, Li G, Yu P, Yang L, Mao L (2013) Silver phosphate/carbon nanotube-stabilized pickering emulsion for highly efficient photocatalysis. J Phys Chem C 117:15183–15191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Xu Y, Xu H, Yan J, Li H, Huang L, Zhang Q, Huang C, Wan H (2013) A novel visible-light-response plasmonic photocatalyst CNT/Ag/AgBr and its photocatalytic properties. Phys Chem Chem Phys 15:5821–5830CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CAS Key Laboratory of Urban Pollutant Conversion, Institute of Urban EnvironmentChinese Academy of SciencesXiamenChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.College of Materials Science and EngineeringHuaqiao UniversityXiamenChina

Personalised recommendations