Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 53, Issue 12, pp 9305–9315 | Cite as

Dynamic transformation of Ti–6Al–4V during torsion in the two-phase region

  • Baoqi Guo
  • S. L. Semiatin
  • John J. Jonas
  • Stephen Yue


Isothermal torsion tests were performed on a Ti–6Al–4V alloy in the two-phase region. The results show that straining leads to an increase in the beta phase fraction, which increases slightly with strain rate. Transformation took place at 880, 940, 960, 980 and 1000 °C. The extent of this type of dynamic transformation (alpha to beta) was increased when the temperature approached the transus temperature. The reverse transformation (beta to alpha) occurred during isothermal holding after torsion and the volume fraction retransformed increased with time. The driving forces promoting dynamic and reverse transformation together with the energy barriers opposing these transformations were derived and compared. The critical stresses required to initiate dynamic transformation are calculated from the flow curves. This analysis confirms that the peak stresses are always higher than the critical stresses at the temperatures employed in the present tests, which makes it possible for the transformation to occur.



The authors are grateful to Dr. Clodualdo Aranas Jr. of CanmetMATERIALS and Prof. Mohammad Jahazi and Dr. Ameth Fall of Ecole de Technologie Superieure (ETS) for discussions. The authors acknowledge with gratitude funding received from the China Scholarship Council and the McGill Engineering Doctoral Award program.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


  1. 1.
    Senuma T (1986) Massive type transformation induced by hot deformation in low carbon steels. In: Proceedings of international conference on martensitic transformations, Nara, pp 515–520Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yada H, Li C-M, Yamagata H (2000) Dynamic γ → α transformation during hot deformation in iron–nickel–carbon alloys. ISIJ Int 40:200–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ying C, Qi-an C (2003) Dilatometric investigation on isothermal transformation after hot deformation. J Iron Steel Res Int 10:46–48Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sun X, Luo H, Dong H, Liu Q, Weng Y (2008) Microstructural evolution and kinetics for post-dynamic transformation in a plain low carbon steel. ISIJ Int 48:994–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aranas C Jr., Nguyen-Minh T, Grewal R, Jonas JJ (2015) Flow softening-based formation of Widmanstätten ferrite in a 0.06% C steel deformed above the Ae3. ISIJ Int 55:300–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aranas C, Rodrigues SF, Shen YJ, Zhang Z, Jonas JJ (2017) Time-temperature-reverse transformation (TTRT) behaviors of a C‐Mn and a Nb microalloyed steel after dynamic transformation above the Ae3. Steel Res Int 88:1–7Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ghosh C, Basabe VV, Jonas JJ, Kim Y-M, Jung I-H, Yue S (2013) The dynamic transformation of deformed austenite at temperatures above the Ae3. Acta Mater 61:2348–2362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xiao N, Tong M, Lan Y, Li D, Li Y (2006) Coupled simulation of the influence of austenite deformation on the subsequent isothermal austenite–ferrite transformation. Acta Mater 54:1265–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ghosh C, Basabe VV, Jonas JJ (2014) Thermodynamics of dynamic transformation of hot deformed austenite in four steels of increasing carbon contents. Mater Sci Eng A 591:173–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jonas JJ, Ghosh C (2013) Role of mechanical activation in the dynamic transformation of austenite. Acta Mater 61:6125–6131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aranas C, Jonas JJ (2015) Effect of Mn and Si on the dynamic transformation of austenite above the Ae3 temperature. Acta Mater 82:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ghosh C, Aranas C, Jonas JJ (2016) Dynamic transformation of deformed austenite at temperatures above the Ae3. Prog Mater Sci 82:151–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ghosh C, Basabe VV, Jonas JJ, Yue S, Xiong XY (2013) Dynamic transformation behavior of a deformed high carbon steel at temperatures above the Ae3. ISIJ Int 53:900–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koike J, Shimoyama Y, Ohnuma I, Okamura T, Kainuma R, Ishida K, Maruyama K (2000) Stress-induced phase transformation during superplastic deformation in two-phase Ti–Al–Fe alloy. Acta Mater 48:2059–2069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yang H, Gurewitz G, Mukherjee A (1991) Mechanical behavior and microstructural evolution during superplastic deformation of Ti–6Al–4V. Mater Trans JIM 32:465–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Prada BH, Mukhopadhyay J, Mukherjee AK (1990) Effect of strain and temperature in a superplastic Ni-modified Ti–6Al–4V Alloy. Mater Trans JIM 31:200–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lu C, Huang L, Geng L, Kaveendran B, Zheng Z, Zhang J (2015) Mechanisms behind the superplastic behavior of as-extruded TiBw/Ti6Al4V composites with a network architecture. Mater Charact 104:139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Matsumoto H, Yoshida K, Lee S-H, Ono Y, Chiba A (2013) Ti–6Al–4V alloy with an ultrafine-grained microstructure exhibiting low-temperature–high-strain-rate superplasticity. Mater Lett 98:209–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang T, Liu Y, Sanders DG, Liu B, Zhang W, Zhou C (2014) Development of fine-grain size titanium 6Al–4V alloy sheet material for low temperature superplastic forming. Mater Sci Eng A 608:265–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ding R, Guo Z, Wilson A (2002) Microstructural evolution of a Ti–6Al–4V alloy during thermomechanical processing. Mater Sci Eng A 327:233–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zong Y, Shan D, Xu M, Lv Y (2009) Flow softening and microstructural evolution of TC11 titanium alloy during hot deformation. J Mater Process Technol 209:1988–1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jonas JJ, Aranas C, Fall A, Jahazi M (2016) Transformation softening in three titanium alloys. Mater Des 113:305–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fields D, Backofen W (1957) Determination of strain hardening characteristics by torsion testing. Proc ASTM 57:1259–1272Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jonas JJ, Ghosh C, Quelennec X, Basabe VV (2013) The critical strain for dynamic transformation in hot deformed austenite. ISIJ Int 53:145–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Goetz R, Semiatin SL (2001) The adiabatic correction factor for deformation heating during the uniaxial compression test. J Mater Eng Perform 10:710–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Senkov O, Jonas JJ (1996) Effect of phase composition and hydrogen level on the deformation behavior of titanium-hydrogen alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 27:1869–1876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rack HJ, Qazi J, Allard L, Valiev R (2008) Thermal stability of severe plastically deformed VT-6 (Ti–6Al–4V). In: Materials Science Forum, Trans Tech Publ, pp 893–898Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sargent GA, Kinsel KT, Pilchak AL, Salem AA, Semiatin SL (2012) Variant selection during cooling after beta annealing of Ti–6Al–4V ingot material. Metall Mater Trans A 43:3570–3585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ohmori Y, Nakai K, Ohtsubo H, Tsunofuri M (1994) Formation of Widmanstätten alpha structure in a Ti–6Al–4V alloy. Mater Trans JIM 35:238–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Semiatin SL, Zhang F, Larsen R, Chapman L, Furrer D (2016) Precipitation in powder-metallurgy, nickel-base superalloys: review of modeling approach and formulation of engineering methods to determine input data. IMMI 5:3–20Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Semiatin SL, Kirby B, Salishchev G (2004) Coarsening behavior of an alpha-beta titanium alloy. Metall Mater Trans A 35:2809–2819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Semiatin SL, Brown T, Goff T, Fagin P, Turner R, Murry J, Barker D, Miller J, Zhang F (2004) Diffusion coefficients for modeling the heat treatment of Ti–6Al–4V. Metall Mater Trans A 35:3015–3018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Aranas C, Foul A, Guo B, Fall A, Jahazi M, Jonas JJ (2017) Determination of the critical stress for the initiation of dynamic transformation in commercially pure titanium. Scr Mater 133:83–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Guo B, Aranas C, Sun B, Ji X, Jonas JJ (2017) Reverse transformation behavior of Ti–6Al–4V after deformation in the two-phase region. Metall Mater Trans A 49:22–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Materials EngineeringMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Air Force Research Laboratory, Materials and Manufacturing DirectorateWright-Patterson Air Force BaseDaytonUSA

Personalised recommendations