Advertisement

Revisiting the fabrication of superhydrophobic aluminum surfaces and their use as soft substrates for droplet manipulation

  • Yiqi Wang
  • Haixiao Shi
  • Xiaoguang LiEmail author
Chemical routes to materials
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

Superhydrophobic aluminum (Al) surfaces are desired in many applications and have been widely studied, but some fundamental issues in their fabrication are not yet fully understood. In this study, commonly used HCl solution and organic acid/sulfur reagents were employed for clarifying the phenomena in etching and composition modification. An unstable layer was revealed after HCl etching, which was removable with water flushing, and this layer, consisting of scattered AlCl3/Al2O3 particles surrounded by Al2O3 plates with cracks, caused changes in surface appearance from bright to dark. A complete change in surface color corresponded to sufficient etching, and hence, this visible phenomenon could be used to confirm the shortest etching time for achieving desirable superhydrophobicity. Composition modification with dodecanethiol and myristic acid also modified the microstructure through a slight etching mechanism and a synergistic effect was found with the use of their mixture, which led to the finest grains and most abundant carbon chains on the final surfaces. Consequently, the best superhydrophobicity was revealed in static and dynamic experiments with droplets. Finally, using the advantage of flexibility, a superhydrophobic Al sheet was demonstrated to be suitable for subjecting droplets to controlled rolling and coalescence, which could be meaningful for many droplet-related studies.

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51672224), Shaanxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 2018JM1002), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 3102018zy037), and Opening Project of Shanghai Key Laboratory of Special Artificial Microstructure Materials and Technology (Grant No. ammt2017A-1).

References

  1. 1.
    Barthlott W, Neinhuis C (1997) Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta 202:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Neinhuis C, Barthlott W (1997) Characterization and distribution of water-repellent, self-cleaning plant surfaces. Ann Bot 79:667–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Xing R, Latthe SS, Bhosale AK, Li R, Kumar AM, Liu S (2017) A novel and facile approach to prepare self-cleaning yellow superhydrophobic polycarbonates. J Mol Liq 247:366–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yin K, Dong X, Zhang F, Wang C, Duan JA (2017) Superamphiphobic miniature boat fabricated by laser micromachining. Appl Phys Lett 110:121909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li XG, Zou LP, Xu LL, Shen J (2012) A superhydrophobic surface prepared by the combination of two sizes of silica particles. Rare Met Mater Eng 41:144–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Qu M, Yuan M, Liu S, He J, Xue M, Liu X, Li S, He J (2018) A versatile and efficient method to fabricate recyclable superhydrophobic composites based on brucite and organosilane. J Mater Sci 53:396–408.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la0607757 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li XG, Shen J (2011) A facile two-step dipping process based on two silica systems for a superhydrophobic surface. Chem Commun 47:10761–10763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    He J, He J, Yuan M, Xue M, Ma X, Hou L, Zhang T, Liu X, Qu M (2018) Facile fabrication of eco-friendly durable superhydrophobic material from eggshell with oil/water separation property. Adv Eng Mater 20:1701180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Luo H, Yin S, Zhang G, Tang Q, Gen J, Huang S (2017) Study of superhydrophobic surface in self-cleaning of magnetorheological fluid. J Mater Sci 53:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la0401011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim S, Hwang H, Cho H, Choi D, Hwang W (2018) Repeatable replication method with liquid infiltration to fabricate robust, flexible, and transparent, anti-reflective superhydrophobic polymer films on a large scale. Chem Eng J 350:225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boyer Q, Duluard S, Tenailleau C, Ansart F, Turq V, Bonino JP (2017) Functionalized superhydrophobic coatings with micro-/nanostructured ZnO particles in a sol–gel matrix. J Mater Sci 52:12677–12688.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la301479c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ye Y, Liu Z, Liu W, Zhang D, Zhao H, Wang L, Li X (2018) Superhydrophobic oligoaniline-containing electroactive silica coating as pre-process coating for corrosion protection of carbon steel. Chem Eng J 348:940–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huang Z, Gurney RS, Wang T, Liu D (2018) Environmentally durable superhydrophobic surfaces with robust photocatalytic self-cleaning and self-healing properties prepared via versatile film deposition methods. J Colloid Interface Sci 527:107–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xu L, Shen Y, Ding Y, Wang L (2018) Superhydrophobic and ultraviolet-blocking cotton fabrics based on TiO2/SiO2 composite nanoparticles. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 18:6879–6886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li XG, Shen J (2013) Deforming water droplets with a superhydrophobic silica coating. Chem Commun 49:10016–10018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Qu M, Ma X, He J, Feng J, Liu S, Yao Y, Hou L, Liu X (2016) Facile selective and diverse fabrication of superhydrophobic, superoleophobic-superhydrophilic and superamphiphobic materials from kaolin. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:1011–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zang D, Zhu R, Zhang W, Yu X, Lin L, Guo X, Liu M, Jiang L (2017) Corrosion resistance: corrosion-resistant superhydrophobic coatings on mg alloy surfaces inspired by lotus seedpod. Adv Funct Mater 27:1605446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schutzius TM, Jung S, Maitra T, Graeber G, Köhme M, Poulikakos D (2015) Spontaneous droplet trampolining on rigid superhydrophobic surfaces. Nature 527:82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bormashenko E, Bormashenko Y (2011) Non-stick droplet surgery with a superhydrophobic scalpel. Langmuir 27:3266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mulroe M, Srijanto B, Collier P, Boreyko J (2017) Tuning superhydrophobic nanostructures to enhance jumping-droplet condensation. ACS Nano 11:8499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li XG, Shi HX, Wang YQ, Wang RX, Huang S, Huang JC, Geng XG, Zang DY (2017) Liquid shaping based on liquid pancakes. Adv Mater Interfaces 5:1701139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li XG, Xue YH, Lv PY, Lin H, Du F, Hu YY, Shen J, Duan HL (2016) Liquid plasticine: controlled deformation and recovery of droplets with interfacial nanoparticle jamming. Soft Matter 12:1655–1662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang N, Xiong D, Deng Y, Shi Y, Wang K (2017) Mechanically robust superhydrophobic steel surface with antiicing, uv-durability, and corrosion resistance properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:6260–6272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang N, Tang L, Tong W, Xiong D (2018) Fabrication of robust and scalable superhydrophobic surfaces and investigation of their anti-icing properties. Mater Des 156:320–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang N, Tang L, Cai Y, Tong W, Xiong D (2018) Scalable superhydrophobic coating with controllable wettability and investigations of its drag reduction. Colloids Surf A 555:290–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yin B, Fang L, Hu J, Tang AQ, He J, Mao JH (2012) A facile method for fabrication of superhydrophobic coating on aluminum alloy. Surf Interface Anal 44:439–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Saleema N, Sarkar DK, Paynter RW, Chen XG (2010) Superhydrophobic aluminum alloy surfaces by a novel one-step process. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2:2500–2502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Xie D, Li W (2011) A novel simple approach to preparation of superhydrophobic surfaces of aluminum alloys. Appl Surf Sci 258:1004–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang H, Dai D, Wu X (2008) Fabrication of superhydrophobic surfaces on aluminum. Appl Surf Sci 254:5599–5601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Liu W, Luo Y, Sun L, Wu R, Jiang H, Liu Y (2013) Fabrication of the superhydrophobic surface on aluminum alloy by anodizing and polymeric coating. Appl Surf Sci 264:872–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Feng L, Zhang H, Wang Z, Liu Y (2014) Superhydrophobic aluminum alloy surface: fabrication, structure, and corrosion resistance. Colloids Surf A 441:319–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bernagozzi I, Antonini C, Villa F, Marengo M (2014) Fabricating superhydrophobic aluminum: an optimized one-step wet synthesis using fluoroalkyl silane. Colloids Surf A 441:919–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Esmaeilirad A, Rukosuyev M, Jun M, Veggel F (2016) A cost-effective method to create physically and thermally stable and storable super-hydrophobic aluminum alloy surfaces. Surf Coat Technol 285:227–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zuo Z, Liao R, Guo C, Yuan Y, Zhao X, Zhuang A, Zhang YY (2015) Fabrication and anti-icing property of coral-like superhydrophobic aluminum surface. Appl Surf Sci 331:132–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wu RM, Jiang HY, Liu WY, Deng J, Yuan ZQ, Liu QL, Chen H (2012) Bacteriostasis of a super-hydrophobic micro-porous aluminum surface by a facile preparation method. Adv Mater Res 583:346–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhang B, Xu W, Zhu Q, Li Y, Hou B (2018) Ultrafast one step construction of non-fluorinated superhydrophobic aluminum surfaces with remarkable improvement of corrosion resistance and anti-contamination. J Colloid Interface Sci 532:201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ngo C, Chun D (2018) Control of laser-ablated aluminum surface wettability to superhydrophobic or superhydrophilic through simple heat treatment or water boiling post-processing. Appl Surf Sci 435:974–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Song Y, Wang X, Dong X, Yin K, Zhang F, Xie Z, Chu D, Duan J (2018) Controllable superhydrophobic aluminum surfaces with tunable adhesion fabricated by femtosecond laser. Opt Laser Technol 102:25–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Li XG, Wang YQ, Yang Y, Wang SH, Zang DY, Geng XG (2018) Dynamic behavior of droplets under interfacial jamming of nanoparticles. Appl Phys Lett 113:133702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Li XG, Wang RX, Shi HX, Song BH (2018) Effective surface tension of liquid marbles using controllable nanoparticle monolayers. Appl Phys Lett 113:101602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Li XG, Wang YQ, Huang JC, Yang Y, Wang RX, Geng XG, Zang DY (2017) Monolayer nanoparticle-covered liquid marbles derived from a sol–gel coating. Appl Phys Lett 111:261604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Li XG, Wang RX, Huang S, Wang YQ, Shi HX (2018) A capillary rise method for studying the effective surface tension of monolayer nanoparticle-covered liquid marbles. Soft Matter 8:8–9.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c8sm01846d Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Li XG, Wang YQ, Wang RX, Wang SH, Zang DY, Geng XG (2018) A dip-decoating process for producing transparent bi-superhydrophobic and wrinkled water surfaces. Adv Mater Interfaces 5:1800356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Su B, Wang S, Song Y, Jiang L (2011) A miniature droplet reactor built on nanoparticle-derived superhydrophobic pedestals. Nano Res 4:266–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Chu Y, Wang Z, Pan Q (2014) Constructing robust liquid marbles for miniaturized synthesis of graphene/ag nanocomposite. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:8378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sarvi F, Jain K, Arbatan T, Verma PJ, Hourigan K, Thompson MC, Shen W, Chan PP (2015) Cardiogenesis of embryonic stem cells with liquid marble micro-bioreactor. Adv Healthc Mater 4:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Vadivelu RK, Kamble H, Munaz A, Nguyen NT (2017) Liquid marbles as bioreactors for the study of three-dimensional cell interactions. Biomed Microdevices 19:31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Li H, Peng L, Kaur G, Xi Y, Yang M (2017) Transparent and gas-permeable liquid marbles for culturing and drug sensitivity test of tumor spheroids. Adv Healthc Mater 6:1700185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Fujii S, Suzaki M, Armes SP, Dupin D, Hamasaki S, Aono K, Nakamura Y (2011) Liquid marbles prepared from ph-responsive sterically stabilized latex particles. Langmuir 27:8067–8074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Oliveira NM, Reis RL, Mano JF (2017) The potential of liquid marbles for biomedical applications: a critical review. Adv Healthc Mater 6:1700192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Jiaqiang E, Jin Y, Deng Y, Zuo W, Zhao X, Han D, Peng Q, Zhang Z (2017) Wetting models and working mechanisms of typical surfaces existing in nature and their application on superhydrophobic surfaces: a review. Adv Mater Interfaces 5:1701052Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Jeevahan J, Chandrasekaran M, Joseph GB, Durairaj RB, Mageshwaran G (2018) Superhydrophobic surfaces: a review on fundamentals, applications, and challenges. J Coat Technol Res 15:231–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied Physics, School of ScienceNorthwestern Polytechnical UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations