Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 54, Issue 7, pp 5528–5535 | Cite as

Transparent and flexible vermiculite–cellulose nanofiber composite membranes with high-temperature proton conduction

  • Xue Gu
  • Bin Li
  • Fenglong Li
  • Kun Zhang
  • Minghui Guo
Composites
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

In this work, exfoliated vermiculite sheets readily formed transparent, flexible membranes having a layered microstructure by intercalation composite method with cellulose nanofibers. The resulting vermiculite–cellulose nanofiber (VMT–CNFs) composite membrane exhibited uniform interlayer spacing due to electrostatic interaction between the nanofibers and the vermiculite sheets. The proton conductivity of the composite membrane was enhanced compared to the pure cellulose nanofiber membrane. This was because the interlayer space in the composite membrane formed hydrophilic nanochannels for proton transport as the two components contain a large number of hydroxyl groups. In addition, due to the high-temperature decomposition resistance of vermiculite crystals, the thermal stability of composite membranes was significantly improved upon the addition of vermiculite sheets. The high-temperature proton conduction of VMT–CNFs composite membrane (100 °C, 0.043 S cm−1) was superior to that of the pure cellulose nanofiber membrane (100 °C, 0.024 S cm−1). Therefore, these composite membranes are suitable for proton conduction applications at high temperatures.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2017YFD0600204).

References

  1. 1.
    Ombres L (2015) Structural performances of reinforced concrete beams strengthened in shear with a cement based fiber composite material. Compos Struct 122:316–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Svagan AJ, Åkesson A, Cárdenas M, Bulut S, Knudsen JC, Risbo J, Plackett D (2012) Transparent films based on PLA and montmorillonite with tunable oxygen barrier properties. Biomacromol 13(2):397–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang J, Cheng Q, Tang Z (2012) Layered nanocomposites inspired by the structure and mechanical properties of nacre. Chem Soc Rev 41(3):1111–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kιzιlcan N, Özkaraman G (2013) In situ preparation of resol/clay nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 129(5):2966–2976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eltantawy IM, Arnold PW (1973) Catalytic decomposition of organic molecules by clays. Nat Phys Sci 244(139):151–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Solin SA (1997) Clays and clay intercalation compounds: properties and physical phenomena. Annu Rev Mater Sci 27(1):89–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ballard DGH, Rideal GR (1983) Flexible inorganic films and coatings. J Mater Sci 18(2):545–561.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00560644 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Abollino O, Giacomino A, Malandrino M, Mentasti E (2008) Interaction of metal ions with montmorillonite and vermiculite. Appl Clay Sci 38(3–4):227–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Norrish K (1961) Low-angle X-ray diffraction studies of the swelling of montmorillonite and vermiculite. Clays Clay Miner 10:123–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martos-Villa R, Guggenheim S, Sainz-Díaz CI (2013) Interlayer water molecules in organocation-exchanged vermiculite and montmorillonite: a case study of tetramethylammonium. Am Miner 98(8–9):1535–1542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Obut A, Girgin I, Yörükoǵlu A (2003) Microwave exfoliation of vermiculite and phlogopite. Clays Clay Miner 51(4):452–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Karaipekli A, Sarı A (2010) Preparation, thermal properties and thermal reliability of eutectic mixtures of fatty acids/expanded vermiculite as novel form-stable composites for energy storage. J Ind Eng Chem 16(5):767–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    O’sullivan AC (1997) Cellulose: the structure slowly unravels. Cellulose 4(3):173–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tu K, Wang Q, Lu A, Zhang L (2014) Portable visible-light photocatalysts constructed from Cu2O nanoparticles and graphene oxide in cellulose matrix. J Phys Chem C 118(13):7202–7210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Iwamoto S, Isogai A, Iwata T (2011) Structure and mechanical properties of wet-spun fibers made from natural cellulose nanofibers. Biomacromol 2(3):831–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Henriksson M, Berglund LA, Isaksson P, Lindström T, Nishino T (2008) Cellulose nanopaper structures of high toughness. Biomacromolecules 9(6):1579–1585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40(7):3941–3994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dufresne A (2013) Nanocellulose: a new ageless bionanomaterial. Mater Today 16(6):220–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Choi KH, Cho SJ, Chun SJ et al (2014) Heterolayered, one-dimensional nanobuilding block mat batteries. Nano Lett 14(10):5677–5686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    He Y, Wang J, Zhang H, Zhang T, Zhang B, Cao S, Liu J (2014) Polydopamine-modified graphene oxide nanocomposite membrane for proton exchange membrane fuel cell under anhydrous conditions. J Mater Chem A 2(25):9548–9558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Aulin C, Salazar-Alvarez G, Lindström T (2012) High strength, flexible and transparent nanofibrillated cellulose–nanoclay biohybrid films with tunable oxygen and water vapor permeability. Nanoscale 4(20):6622–6628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li Y, Hoorfar M, Shen K, Fang J, Yue X, Jiang Z (2017) Development of a crosslinked pore-filling membrane with an extremely low swelling ratio and methanol crossover for direct methanol fuel cells. Electrochim Acta 232:226–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cui Y, Kumar S, Kona BR, van Houcke D (2015) Gas barrier properties of polymer/clay nanocomposites. RSC Adv 5(78):63669–63690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tang Y, Yang S, Zhang N, Zhang J (2014) Preparation and characterization of nanocrystalline cellulose via low-intensity ultrasonic-assisted sulfuric acid hydrolysis. Cellulose 21(1):335–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yu XB, Wei CH, Ke L, Wu HZ, Chai XS, Hu Y (2012) Preparation of trimethylchlorosilane-modified acid vermiculites for removing diethyl phthalate from water. J Colloid Interface Sci 369(1):344–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gogoi RK, Saha K, Deka J, Brahma D, Raidongia K (2017) Solvent-driven responsive bilayer membranes of clay and graphene oxide. J Mater Chem A 5(7):3523–3533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang J, He Y, Zhao L, Li Y, Cao S, Zhang B, Zhang H (2015) Enhanced proton conductivities of nanofibrous composite membranes enabled by acid–base pairs under hydrated and anhydrous conditions. J Membr Sci 482:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li Y, Liang L, Liu C, Li Y, Xing W, Sun J (2018) Self-healing proton-exchange membranes composed of nafion-poly (vinyl alcohol) complexes for durable direct methanol fuel cells. Adv Mater 30(25):1707146CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Bio-Based Material Science and Technology (Ministry of Education), College of Material Science and EngineeringNortheast Forestry UniversityHarbinPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations