Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 54, Issue 7, pp 5615–5624 | Cite as

Device simulation of lead-free MASnI3 solar cell with CuSbS2 (copper antimony sulfide)

  • Chandni Devi
  • Rajesh Mehra
Electronic materials
  • 45 Downloads

Abstract

The perovskite solar cells (PSCs) which are Pb free have gained much research enthusiasm because of the toxic nature of the lead-based halide perovskite. MASnI3 is a feasible contrasting option to MAPbX3, in light of the fact that it has broader visible absorption spectrum range and smaller band gap value of 1.3 eV than MAPbI3. The advance of fabricating Sn-based PSCs with great strength has animated the investigations of these MASnI3-based solar cells enormously. In this paper, planar heterojunction design of Sn-based iodide PSC is proposed. The copper antimony sulfide (CuSbS2) which is inorganic material is used for the very first time as hole transport layer (HTL) in conjunction with the MASnI3 active layer in this design because of its inherent features (high abundance and high open-circuit voltage) as compared to the unstable and costly Spiro-MeOTAD. With integration of CuSbS2 as a HTL in the design, the outcomes are competent enough with Jsc of 31.7 mA/cm2, Voc of 0.936 V, FF of 81.1% and PCE of 24.1%. The outcomes demonstrate that the Pb-free MASnI3 PSC is a future perspective to the photovoltaic community in terms of environment friendly nature and yielding comparative high efficiency as of lead-based halide perovskite cell.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in terms of consulting fees, honoraria, payments for expert testimony; support for travel to meetings for the study, manuscript preparation or other purposes; multiple affiliations; fees for participation in review activities; payment for writing or reviewing of a manuscript; provision of writing assistance; intellectual property rights, patents and patent applications (including planned applications); and royalty payments.

References

  1. 1.
    Kazim S, Nazeeruddin MK, Grätzel M, Ahmad S (2014) Perovskite as light harvester: a game changer in photovoltaics. Angew Chem Int Ed 53:2812–2824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lotsch BV (2013) New light on an old story: perovskites go solar. Angew Chem Int Ed 53:635–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wei Z, Chen H, Yan K, Yang S (2014) Inkjet printing and instant chemical transformation of a CH3NH3 PbI3/nanocarbon electrode and interface for planar perovskite solar cells. Angew Chem Int Ed 53:13239–13243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kojima A, Teshima K, Shirai Y, Miyasaka T (2009) Organometal halide perovskites as visible-light sensitizers for photovoltaic cells. J Am Chem Soc 131:6050–6051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Stoumpos CC, Malliakas CD, Kanatzidis MG (2013) Semiconducting tin and lead iodide perovskites with organic cations: phase transitions, high mobilities, and near-infrared photoluminescent properties. Inorg Chem 52:9019–9038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Umari P, Mosconi E, De Angelis F (2014) Relativistic GW calculations on CH3NH3 PbI3 and CH3NH3 SnI3 perovskites for solar cell applications. Sci Rep 4:1–7Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen QY, Huang Y, Huang PR, Ma T, Cao C, He Y (2016) Electronegativity explanation on the efficiency-enhancing mechanism of the hybrid inorganic–organic perovskite ABX3 from first-principles study. Chin Phys B 25:27104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hao F, Stoumpos CC, Cao DH, Chang RPH, Kanatzidis MG (2014) Lead-free solid-state organic–inorganic halide perovskite solar cells. Nat Photonics 8:489–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hao F, Stoumpos CC, Guo P, Zhou N, Marks TJ, Chang RP, Kanatzidis MG (2015) Solvent-mediated crystallization of CH3NH3 SnI3 films for heterojunction depleted perovskite solar cells. J Am Chem Soc 137:11445–11452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Koh TM, Krishnamoorthy T, Yantara N, Shi C, Leong WL, Boix PP, Grimsdale AC, Mhaisalkar SG, Mathews N (2015) Formamidinium tin-based perovskite with low E g for photovoltaic applications. J Mater Chem A 3:14996–15000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marshall KP, Walton RI, Hatton RA (2015) Tin perovskite/fullerene planar layer photovoltaics: improving the efficiency and stability of lead-free devices. J Mater Chem A 3:11631–11640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kumar MH, Dharani S, Leong WL, Boix PP, Prabhakar RR, Baikie T, Shi C, Ding H, Ramesh R, Asta M, Graetzel M, Mhaisalkar SG, Mathews N (2014) Lead-free halide perovskite solar cells with high photocurrents realized through vacancy modulation. Adv Mater 26:7122–7127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Noel NK, Stranks SD, Abate A, Wehrenfennig C, Guarnera S, Haghighirad A-A, Sadhanala A, Eperon GE, Pathak SK, Johnston MB, Petrozza A, Herz LM, Snaith HJ (2014) Lead-free organic-inorganic tin halide perovskites for photovoltaic applications. Energy Environ Sci 7:3061–3068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nazeeruddin MK, Hyeju Choi JK, Park S, Paek S, Ekanayake P (2014) Efficient star-shaped hole transporting materials with diphenylethenyl side arms for an efficient perovskite solar cell. J Mater Chem A 2:19136–19140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Minemoto T, Murata M (2014) Theoretical analysis on effect of band offsets in perovskite solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 133:8–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jian-zhuo Z, Ling-hui Q, Hui-jing D, Ying-chun C, Jian-zhuo Z, Phys C (2015) Simulation study of the losses and influences of geminate and bimolecular recombination on the performances of bulk heterojunction organic solar. Chin Phys B 24:108501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kemp KW, Labelle AJ, Thon SM, Ip AH, Kramer IJ, Hoogland S, Sargent EH (2013) Interface recombination in depleted heterojunction photovoltaics based on colloidal quantum dots. Adv Energy Mater 3:917–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Minemoto T, Murata M (2014) Device modeling of perovskite solar cells based on structural similarity with thin film inorganic solar cells. J Appl Phys 116:54505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Minemoto T, Murata M (2014) Impact of work function of back contact of perovskite solar cells without hole transport material analyzed by device simulation. Curr Appl Phys 14:1428–1433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yang WS, Park B-W, Jung EH, Jeon NJ (2017) Iodide management in formamidinium-lead-halide-based perovskite layers for efficient solar cells. Science 356:1376–1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rajeswari R, Mrinalini M, Prasanthkumar S, Giribabu L (2017) Emerging of inorganic hole transporting materials for perovskite solar cells. Chem Rec 17:681–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang H, Yu Z, Jiang X, Li J, Cai B, Yang X, Sun L (2017) Efficient and stable inverted planar perovskite solar cells employing copper(I) iodide hole-transporting layer prepared by solid–gas transformation. Energy Technol 5:1836–1843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Christians JA, Fung RCM, Kamat PV (2014) An inorganic hole conductor for organo-lead halide perovskite solar cells. Improved hole conductivity with copper iodide. J Am Chem Soc 136:758–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chen W-Y, Deng L-L, Dai S-M, Wang X, Tian C-B, Zhan X-X, Xie S-Y, Huang R-B, Zheng L-S (2015) Low-cost solution-processed copper iodide as an alternative to PEDOT: PSS hole transport layer for efficient and stable inverted planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells. J Mater Chem A 3:19353–19359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Qin P, Tanaka S, Ito S, Tetreault N, Manabe K, Nishino H, Nazeeruddin MK, Grätzel M (2014) Inorganic hole conductor-based lead halide perovskite solar cells with 12.4% conversion efficiency. Nat Commun 5:3834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kim JH, Liang P-W, Williams ST, Cho N, Chueh C-C, Glaz MS, Ginger DS, Jen AK-Y (2015) High-performance and environmentally stable planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells based on a solution-processed copper-doped nickel oxide hole-transporting layer. Adv Mater 27:695–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Karimi E, Ghorashi SMB (2017) Investigation of the influence of different hole-transporting materials on the performance of perovskite solar cells. Opt Int J Light Electron Opt 130:650–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tan K, Lin P, Wang G, Liu Y, Xu Z, Lin Y (2016) Controllable design of solid-state perovskite solar cells by SCAPS device simulation. Solid State Electron 126:75–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Garza C, Shaji S, Arato A, Perez Tijerina E, Alan Castillo G, Das Roy TK, Krishnan B (2011) Solar energy materials and solar cells p-type CuSbS2 thin films by thermal diffusion of copper into Sb2S3. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 95:2001–2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Du H-J, Wang W-C, Zhu J-Z (2016) Device simulation of lead-free CH3NH3SnI3 perovskite solar cells with high efficiency. J Chin Phys B 25:108802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhou J, Bian GQ, Zhu QY, Zhang Y, Li CY, Dai J (2009) Solvothermal crystal growth of CuSbQ2 (Q = S, Se) and the correlation between macroscopic morphology and microscopic structure. J Solid State Chem 40:259–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Moosakhani S, Alvani AAS, Mohammadpour R, Hannula P-M, Ge Y, Hannula S-P (2018) Platelet CuSbS2 particles with a suitable conduction band position for solar cell applications. Mater Lett 215:157–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Moosakhani S, Alvani AAS, Mohammadpour R, Hannula P-M, Ge Y, Hannula S-P (2018) Effect of sulfonating agent and ligand chemistry on structural and optical properties of CuSbS2 particles prepared by heat-up method. Cryst Eng Commun 20:1527–1535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Moosakhani S, Alvani AAS, Mohammadpour R, Ge Y, Hannula S-P (2018) Solution synthesis of CuSbS2 nanocrystals: a new approach to control shape and size. J Alloys Compd 736:190–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Liu F, Zhu J, Wei J, Li Y, Lv M, Yang S, Zhang B, Yao J, Dai S (2014) Numerical simulation: toward the design of high-efficiency planar perovskite solar cells. Appl Phys Lett 104:253508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Teimouri R, Mohammadpou R (2018) Potential application of CuSbS2 as the hole transport material in perovskite solar cell: a simulation study. Superlattices Microstruct 118:116–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shockley W, Read WT Jr (1952) Statistics of the recombinations of holes and electrons. J Phys Rev 87:835–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chen QY, Huang Y, Huang PR, Ma T, Cao C, He Y (2015) Electronegativity explanation on the efficiency-enhancing mechanism of the hybrid inorganic-organic perovskite ABX3 from first-principles study. Chin Phys B 25:27104CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringNational Institute for Technical Teachers Training and ResearchChandigarhIndia

Personalised recommendations