Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 54, Issue 7, pp 5712–5725 | Cite as

The potential of electrospun poly(methyl methacrylate)/polycaprolactone core–sheath fibers for drug delivery applications

  • Maria Cecília Rodrigues Simões
  • Simon M. Cragg
  • Eugen Barbu
  • Frederico B. De SousaEmail author
Materials for life sciences
  • 99 Downloads

Abstract

Drug-loaded core–sheath fibers were successfully prepared from a combination of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and polycaprolactone (PCL) using a coaxial electrospinning system and Nimesulide as an anti-inflammatory drug model. An electric field potential of 7–8 kV was found optimal for the formation of the fibers, which were characterized using scanning and transmission electron microscopy techniques combined with attenuated total reflectance infrared spectroscopy and contact angle measurements. Results confirmed the core–sheath morphology and indicated that these fibers are larger in diameter than normal ones (prepared as controls from either PCL or PMMA, under similar conditions). The prepared core–sheath fibers were also investigated by differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis, and results indicated that Nimesulide is completely solubilized in the polymer matrix and that its presence improved the thermal stability of the core–sheath fibers compared to that of normal PMMA fibers. Moreover, PMMA-PCL core–sheath fibers showed an improvement in terms of mechanical properties (such as elongation at break) in comparison with pure PMMA fibers. Drug release studies demonstrated that the delivery of Nimesulide can be modulated by appropriately selecting the loading area, with faster release observed when the drug was located in the sheath. Results suggest altogether the significant potential of PMMA-PCL core–sheath fibers for applications involving delivery of hydrophobic anti-inflammatory drugs such as Nimesulide.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution of Ana Leão Mouquet, Andréia Bagliotti Meneguin, Aikaterini Lalatsa and Marta Roldo to certain experimental aspects and useful discussions. This work was supported by the PDSE program (CAPES N. 019/2017), FAPEMIG (Grant Numbers APQ-00134-14 and APQ-00403-17) and CNPq (Grant Numbers: 312367/2014-7 and 306726/2017-3). This work was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—BRASIL (CAPES)-Finance Code No 001. The authors gratefully acknowledge the Federal Institute of South of Minas Gerais–IFSuldeminas for their support.

References

  1. 1.
    Greiner A, Wendorff JH (2007) Electrospinning: a fascinating method for the preparation of ultrathin fibers. Angew Chem Int Edit 46:5670–5703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xue J, Xie J, Liu W, Xia Y (2017) Electrospun nanofibers: new concepts, materials, and applications. Acc Chem Res 50:1976–1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hu X, Liu S, Zhou G et al (2014) Electrospinning of polymeric nanofibers for drug delivery applications. J Control Release 185:12–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sill TJ, Von Recum HA (2008) Electrospinning: applications in drug delivery and tissue engineering. Biomaterials 29:1989–2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baji A, Mai YW, Wong SC et al (2010) Electrospinning of polymer nanofibers: effects on oriented morphology, structures and tensile properties. Compos Sci Technol 70:703–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ibrahim I, Sadiku E, Jamiru T et al (2017) Applications of polymers in the biomedical field. Curr Trends Biomed Eng Biosci 4:9–11Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liang D, Hsiao BS, Chu B (2007) Functional electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 59:1392–1412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pelipenko J, Kocbek P, Kristl J (2015) Critical attributes of nanofibers: preparation, drug loading, and tissue regeneration. Int J Pharm 484:57–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chou SF, Carson D, Woodrow KA (2015) Current strategies for sustaining drug release from electrospun nanofibers. J Control Release 220:584–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Munj HR, Tyler Nelson M, Karandikar PS et al (2014) Biocompatible electrospun polymer blends for biomedical applications. J Biomed Mater Res–Part B Appl Biomater 102:1517–1527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Göke K, Lorenz T, Repanas A et al (2018) Novel strategies for the formulation and processing of poorly water-soluble drugs. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 126:40–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kumbar SG, Nair LS, Bhattacharyya S, Laurencin CT (2006) Polymeric nanofibers as novel carriers for the delivery of therapeutic molecules. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 6:2591–2607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sebe I, Szabó P, Kállai-Szabó B, Zelkó R (2015) Incorporating small molecules or biologics into nanofibers for optimized drug release: a review. Int J Pharm 494:516–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rainsford KD (2005) The discovery, development and novel actions of nimesulide. In: Nimesulide–actions and uses. Birkhäuser Basel, pp 1–61Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huerta C, del Aberturas M, Molpeceres J (2015) Nimesulide-loaded nanoparticles for the potential coadjuvant treatment of prostate cancer. Int J Pharm 493:152–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bessone F (2010) Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: what is the actual risk of liver damage? World J Gastroenterol 16:5651–5661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marziyeh S, Moghddam M, Ahad A et al (2017) Optimization of nanostructured lipid carriers for topical delivery of nimesulide using Box–Behnken design approach. Artif Cell Nanomed B 45:617–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Donati M, Conforti A, Lenti MC et al (2016) Risk of acute and serious liver injury associated to nimesulide and other NSAIDs: data from drug-induced liver injury case–control study in Italy. Br J Clin Pharmacol 82:238–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bakhrushina EO, Anurova MN, Smirnov VV, Demina NB (2017) Development of analytical methods for peroral prolonged-release nimesulide gel. Pharm Chem J 51:130–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sperling LE, Reis KP, Pranke P, Wendorff JH (2016) Advantages and challenges offered by biofunctional core-shell fiber systems for tissue engineering and drug delivery. Drug Discov Today 21:1243–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Khalf A, Madihally SV (2017) Modeling the permeability of multiaxial electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone)-gelatin hybrid fibers for controlled doxycycline release. Mater Sci Eng C-Mater Biol Appl 76:161–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lu Y, Huang J, Yu G et al (2016) Coaxial electrospun fibers: applications in drug delivery and tissue engineering. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 8:654–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Qian W, Yu D, Li Y et al (2013) Triple-component drug-loaded nanocomposites prepared using a modified coaxial electrospinning. J Nanomater 2013:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Oliveira MF, Suarez D, Rocha JCB et al (2015) Electrospun nanofibers of polyCD/PMAA polymers and their potential application as drug delivery system. Mater Sci Eng C-Mater Biol Appl 54:252–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bonadies I, Maglione L, Ambrogi V et al (2017) Electrospun core/shell nanofibers as designed devices for efficient Artemisinin delivery. Eur Polym J 89:211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Castillo-Ortega MM, Nájera-Luna A, Rodríguez-Félix DE et al (2011) Preparation, characterization and release of amoxicillin from cellulose acetate and poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) coaxial electrospun fibrous membranes. Mater Sci Eng C-Mater Biol Appl 31:1772–1778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Najafi-Taher R, Derakhshan MA, Faridi-Majidi R, Amani A (2015) Preparation of an ascorbic acid/PVA–chitosan electrospun mat: a core/shell transdermal delivery system. RSC Adv 5:50462–50469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ali U, Karim KJA, Buang NA (2015) A review of the properties and applications of poly (Methyl Methacrylate) (PMMA). Polym Rev 55:678–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bettencourt A (2012) Poly (methyl methacrylate) particulate carriers in drug delivery. J Microencapsul 29:353–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dong H, Strawhecker KE, Snyder JF et al (2012) Cellulose nanocrystals as a reinforcing material for electrospun poly(methyl methacrylate) fibers: formation, properties and nanomechanical characterization. Carbohyd Polym 87:2488–2495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Woodruff MA, Hutmacher DW (2010) The return of a forgotten polymer–Polycaprolactone in the 21st century. Prog Polym Sci 35:1217–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Suwantong O (2016) Biomedical applications of electrospun polycaprolactone fiber mats. Polym Advan Technol 27:1264–1273.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.3876 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ali Akbari Ghavimi S, Ebrahimzadeh MH, Solati-Hashjin M, Abu Osman NA (2014) Polycaprolactone/starch composite: fabrication, structure, properties, and applications. J Biomed Mater Res–Part A 103:2482–2498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Munj HR, Tomasko DL (2017) Polycaprolactone-polymethyl methacrylate electrospun blends for biomedical applications. Polym Sci Ser A 59:695–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Son S-R, Linh N-TB, Yang H-M, Lee B-T (2013) In vitro and in vivo evaluation of electrospun PCL/PMMA fibrous scaffolds for bone regeneration. Sci Technol Adv Mater 14:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kim Y-H, Lee B-T (2011) Novel approach to the fabrication of an artificial small bone using a combination of sponge replica and electrospinning methods. Sci Technol Adv Mater 12:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yoon J, Yang HS, Lee BS, Yu WR (2018) Recent progress in coaxial electrospinning: new parameters, various structures, and wide applications. Adv Mater 1704765:1–23Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ribeiro SD, Guimes RF, Meneguin AB et al (2016) Cellulose triacetate films obtained from sugarcane bagasse: evaluation as coating and mucoadhesive material for drug delivery systems. Carbohydr Polym 152:764–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bagliotti Meneguin A, Stringhetti Ferreira Cury B, Evangelista RC (2014) Films from resistant starch-pectin dispersions intended for colonic drug delivery. Carbohydr Polym 99:140–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lalatsa A, Emeriewen K, Protopsalti V et al (2016) Developing transcutaneous nanoenabled anaesthetics for eyelid surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 100:871–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zupančič Š, Potrč T, Baumgartner S et al (2016) Formulation and evaluation of chitosan/polyethylene oxide nanofibers loaded with metronidazole for local infections. Eur J Pharm Sci 95:152–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wang Q, Wang YZ, Zhao ZF, Fang B (2012) Synthesis of SIS-based hot-melt pressure sensitive adhesives for transdermal delivery of hydrophilic drugs. Int J Adhes Adhes 34:62–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rasekh M, Young C, Roldo M et al (2015) Hollow-layered nanoparticles for therapeutic delivery of peptide prepared using electrospraying. J Mater Sci-Mater M 26:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Erbas E, Kiziltas A, Bollin SC, Gardner DJ (2015) Preparation and characterization of transparent PMMA—cellulose-based nanocomposites. Carbohyd Polym 127:381–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Abdelrazek EM, Hezma AM, El-khodary A, Elzayat AM (2016) Spectroscopic studies and thermal properties of PCL/PMMA biopolymer blend. Egypt J Basic Appl Sci 3:10–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Khodkar F, Golshan Ebrahimi N (2017) Preparation and properties of antibacterial, biocompatible core–shell fibers produced by coaxial electrospinning. J Appl Polym Sci 134:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Liu H, Liu D, Fei Y, Wu Q (2010) Fabrication and properties of transparent polymethylmethacrylate/cellulose nanocrystals composites. Bioresour Technol 101:5685–5692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Carrizales C, Pelfrey S, Rincon R et al (2008) Thermal and mechanical properties of electrospun PMMA, PVC, Nylon 6, and Nylon 6,6. Polym Advan Technol 19:124–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ferriol M, Gentilhomme A, Cochez M (2003) Thermal degradation of poly (methyl methacrylate)(PMMA): modelling of DTG and TG curves. Polym Degrad Stabil 79:271–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sivalingam G, Karthik R, Madras G (2003) Kinetics of thermal degradation of poly(ε-caprolactone). J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 70:631–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Suwantong O (2016) Biomedical applications of electrospun polycaprolactone fiber mats. Polym Advan Technol 27:1264–1273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kissa E (1996) Wetting and wicking. Text Res J 66:660–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Standard test methods for water vapor transmission of materials 1, American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM 96Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Tan B, Thomas NL (2016) A review of the water barrier properties of polymer/clay and polymer/graphene nanocomposites. J Membrane Sci 514:595–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Zupančič Š, Sinha-Ray S, Sinha-Ray S et al (2016) Long-term sustained ciprofloxacin release from PMMA and hydrophilic polymer blended nanofibers. Mol Pharm 13:295–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Langenbucher F (1972) Letters to the editor: linearization of dissolution rate curves by the Weibull distribution. J Pharm Pharmacol 24:979–981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Repanas A, Glasmacher B (2015) Dipyridamole embedded in Polycaprolactone fibers prepared by coaxial electrospinning as a novel drug delivery system. J Drug Deliv Sci Tec 29:132–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Sultanova Z, Kaleli G, Kabay G, Mutlu M (2016) Controlled release of a hydrophilic drug from coaxially electrospun polycaprolactone nanofibers. Int J Pharm 505:133–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratório de Sistemas Poliméricos e Supramoleculares (LSPS) - Instituto de Física e QuímicaUniversidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)ItajubáBrazil
  2. 2.Institute of Marine Sciences, School of Biological SciencesUniversity of PortsmouthPortsmouthUK
  3. 3.School of Pharmacy and Biomedical SciencesUniversity of PortsmouthPortsmouthUK

Personalised recommendations