Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 54, Issue 7, pp 5605–5614 | Cite as

High-performance GaAs nanowire cathode for photon-enhanced thermionic emission solar converters

  • Lei LiuEmail author
  • Yu Diao
  • Sihao Xia
Electronic materials
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

GaAs nanowire cathodes with exponential doping and graded Al composition structures are proposed for photon-enhanced thermionic emission (PETE) devices. The conversion efficiency models with these two nanowire cathodes are deduced on the basis of one-dimensional continuity equations. The conversion efficiency as a function of wire length, wire width, Al composition distribution, cathode temperature, emissive surface and back interface recombination velocity are also simulated, respectively. Results show that exponential doping and graded Al composition cathode structures can obviously improve the conversion efficiency of devices through introducing a built-in electric field along the growth direction of nanowire. Besides, the optimum wire length and wire width range are 300–340 nm and 5.9–6.4 μm, respectively. Moreover, wider Al composition range is beneficial to achieve higher conversion efficiency. These simulations provide an interesting attempt to explore the working mechanism of GaAs nano-based PETE devices and are expected to be verified by the experimental results in the future.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been partially sponsored by the Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province (2015-XCL-008), by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (30916011206), by the Qing Lan Project of Jiangsu Province (2017-AD41779) and by the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (KYCX18_0402).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Hashmi G, Miettunen K, Peltola T et al (2011) Review of materials and manufacturing options for large area flexible dye solar cells. Renew Sust Energy Rev 15(8):3717–3732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schwede JW, Bargatin I, Riley DC et al (2010) Photon-enhanced thermionic emission for solar concentrator systems. Nat Mater 9:762–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schwede JW, Sarmiento T, Narasimhan VK et al (2013) Photon-enhanced thermionic emission from heterostructures with low interface recombination. Nat Commun 4:1576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yang ZP, Ci L, Bur JA et al (2008) Experimental observation of an extremely dark material made by a low-density nanotube array. Nano Lett 8(2):446–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    He Y, Zhao Y, Quan J, Ouyang G (2016) Shape engineering for electronic and optoelectronic properties of Si nanostructure solar cells. J Appl Phys 120(14):144302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    He Y, Yu W, Ouyang G (2016) Shape-dependent conversion efficiency of Si nanowire solar cells with polygonal cross-sections. J Appl Phys 119(22):225101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Garnett E, Light Yang P (2010) Trapping in silicon nanowire solar cells. Nano Lett 10(3):1082–1087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xia S, Liu L, Diao Y, Feng S (2017) Research on quantum efficiency and photoemission characteristics of exponential-doping GaN nanowire photocathode. J Mater Sci 52(21):12795–12805.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1394-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maruyama T, Brachmann A, Clendenin JE et al (2002) A very high charge, high polarization gradient-doped strained GaAs photocathode. Nucl Instrum Methods A 492(1–2):199–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen X, Zhang Y, Chang B et al (2013) Research on quantum efficiency of reflection-mode GaAs photocathode with thin emission layer. Opt Commun 287:35–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang K, Fu R, Wang G et al (2017) High-performance photon-enhanced thermionic emission solar energy converters with AlxGa1−xAs/GaAs cathode under multilevel built-in electric field. Opt Commun 402:85–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dhindsa N, Chia A, Boulanger J et al (2014) Highly ordered vertical GaAs nanowire arrays with dry etching and their optical properties. Nanotechnology 25(30):305303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wu ZH, Mei XY, Kim D et al (2002) Growth of Au-catalyzed ordered GaAs nanowire arrays by molecular-beam epitaxy. Appl Phys Lett 81(27):5177–5179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Casey HC, Sell DD, Wecht KW (1975) Concentration dependence of the absorption coefficient for n- and p-type GaAs between 1.3 and 1.6 eV. J Appl Phys 46(1):250–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yang Y, Yang W, Sun C (2015) Heterostructured cathode with graded bandgap window-layer for photon-enhanced thermionic emission solar energy converters. Sol Energy Mater Sol C 132:410–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Adachi S (1985) GaAs, AlAs, and AlxGa1−xAs: material parameters for use in research and device applications. J Appl Phys 58(3):R1–R29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Levinshtein M, Rumyantsev S, Shur M (1996) Handbook series on semiconductor parameters. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 196–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zarem HA, Lebens JA, Nordstrom KB et al (1989) Effect of Al mole fraction on carrier diffusion lengths and lifetimes in AlxGa1-xAs. Appl Phys Lett 55(25):2622–2624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Koeck FAM, Nemanich RJ, Lazea A et al (2009) Thermionic electron emission from low work-function phosphorus doped diamond films. Diam Relat Mater 18(5):789–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Optoelectronic Technology, School of Electronic and Optical EngineeringNanjing University of Science and TechnologyNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations