Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 53, Issue 7, pp 5204–5215 | Cite as

PTFE/SPEEK/PDDA/PSS composite membrane for vanadium redox flow battery application

  • Xiangguo Teng
  • Cong Yu
  • Xiufen Wu
  • Yichao Dong
  • Peng Gao
  • Huili Hu
  • Yongming Zhu
  • Jicui Dai
Energy materials

Abstract

How to solve the crossover of vanadium ions through ion exchange membrane is a key issue in vanadium redox flow battery (VRB), especially for ultra-thin membranes used for VRB to obtain a lower cell resistance. Herein, an ultra-thin (~ 30 μm) PTFE/SPEEK [polytetrafluoroethylene/sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone), P/S] membrane is successfully prepared and modified by using layer-by-layer (LBL) self-assembly technique with polycation poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) (PDDA) and polyanion poly(sodium styrene sulfonate) (PSS). P/S membranes are alternatively immersed in positively and negatively charged polyelectrolyte to form 2 to 8 bilayers onto its surface. Consequently, a series of P/S-[PDDA/PSS] n (n is the number of multilayers) membranes are fabricated. Both the physicochemical properties and VRB performances of the P/S-[PDDA/PSS] n membranes are then investigated in detail. Results show that the ion selectivity of the P/S-[PDDA/PSS] n membranes is much higher than that of pristine P/S membrane, especially for P/S-[PDDA/PSS]6 membrane. As a result, the VRB with the P/S-[PDDA/PSS]6 membrane exhibits the highest coulombic efficiency (CE) of 96.5% at 80 mA cm−2, the highest voltage efficiency of 94.7% at 40 mA cm−2 and the highest energy efficiency of 87.7% at both 40 and 50 mA cm−2, respectively. In addition, 80 times charge–discharge test proves that the P/S-[PDDA/PSS]6 membrane possesses high stability and no obvious CE decay after running. All the results show that the LBL technique is an effective way to prepare ultra-thin membrane with high ion selectivity for VRB application.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully thank the financial supports of this work by the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. ZR2017MB032), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21703048) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. HIT. NSRIF. 201707).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest for all authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Yang Z, Zhang J, Kintner-Meyer MCW, Lu X, Choi D, Lemmon JP, Liu J (2011) Electrochemical energy storage for green grid. Chem Rev 111:3577–3613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Soloveichik GL (2015) Flow batteries: current status and trends. Chem Rev 115:11533–11558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Feng T, Jiang W, Zong Z, Wu M (2018) Investigation of the electrochemical performance of polyvinylidene fluoride-derived LiFePO4/C composite nanospheres. J Mater Sci 53:1279–1285.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1585-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Weber AZ, Mench MM, Meyers JP, Ross PN, Gostick JT, Liu Q (2011) Redox flow batteries: a review. J Appl Electrochem 41:1137–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Prasada Rao R, Adams S (2016) Membranes for rechargeable lithium sulphur semi-flow batteries. J Mater Sci 51:5556–5564.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-9860-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wei X, Pan W, Duan W, Hollas A, Yang Z, Li B, Nie Z, Liu J, Reed D, Wang W, Sprenkle V (2017) Materials and systems for organic redox flow batteries: status and challenges. ACS Energy Lett 2:2187–2204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leung P, Shah AA, Sanz L, Flox C, Morante JR, Xu Q, Mohamed MR, Ponce De León C, Walsh FC (2017) Recent developments in organic redox flow batteries: a critical review. J Power Sources 360:243–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gobinath PR, Anthony MV (2016) The zinc bromine flow battery. Springer, Singapore, pp 2–3Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhou H, Zhang H, Zhao P, Yi B (2006) A comparative study of carbon felt and activated carbon based electrodes for sodium polysulfide/bromine redox flow battery. Electrochim Acta 51:6304–6312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Skyllas-Kazacos M, Rychcik M, Robins RG, Fane AG, Green MA (1986) New all-vanadium redox flow cell. J Electrochem Soc 133:1057–1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jelyani MZ, Rashid-Nadimi S, Asghari S (2017) Treated carbon felt as electrode material in vanadium redox flow batteries: a study of the use of carbon nanotubes as electrocatalyst. J Solid State Electrochem 21:69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang G, Zhang J, Zhang J, Chen J, Zhu S, Liu X, Wang R (2017) Sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone)/poly(vinylidene fluoride)/graphene composite membrane for a vanadium redox flow battery. J Solid State Electrchem 21:1185–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Parasuraman A, Lim TM, Menictas C, Skyllas-Kazacos M (2013) Review of material research and development for vanadium redox flow battery applications. Electrochim Acta 101:27–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pezeshki AM, Tang ZJ, Fujimoto C, Sun CN, Mench MM, Zawodzinski TA (2016) Full cell study of diels alder poly(phenylene) anion and cation exchange membranes in vanadium redox flow batteries. J Electrochem Soc 163:A5154–A5162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen D, Wang S, Xiao M, Han D, Meng Y (2011) Synthesis of sulfonated poly(fluorenyl ether thioether ketone)s with bulky-block structure and its application in vanadium redox flow battery. Polymer 52:5312–5319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jeong S, Kim L, Kwon Y, Kim S (2014) Effect of nafion membrane thickness on performance of vanadium redox flow battery. Korean J Chem Eng 31:2081–2087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Doan TNL, Hoang TKA, Chen P (2015) Recent development of polymer membranes as separators for all-vanadium redox flow batteries. RSC Adv 5:72805–72815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dai W, Shen Y, Li Z, Yu L, Xi J, Qiu X (2014) SPEEK/Graphene oxide nanocomposite membranes with superior cyclability for highly efficient vanadium redox flow battery. J Mater Chem A 2:12423–12432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xi J, Li Z, Yu L, Yin B, Wang L, Liu L, Qiu X, Chen L (2015) Effect of degree of sulfonation and casting solvent on sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) membrane for vanadium redox flow battery. J Power Sources 285:195–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Winardi S, Raghu SC, Oo MO, Yan Q, Wai N, Lim TM, Skyllas-Kazacos M (2014) Sulfonated poly (ether ether ketone)-based proton exchange membranes for vanadium redox battery applications. J Membr Sci 450:313–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Park S, Kim H (2016) Preparation of a sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone)-based composite membrane with phenyl isocyanate treated sulfonated graphene oxide for a vanadium redox flow battery. J Electrochem Soc 163:A2293–A2298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hyeon DH, Chun JH, Lee CH, Jung HC, Kim SH (2015) Composite membranes based on sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) and SiO2 for a vanadium redox flow battery. Korean J Chem Eng 32:1554–1563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wei W, Zhang H, Li X, Mai Z, Zhang H (2012) Poly(tetrafluoroethylene) reinforced sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) membranes for vanadium redox flow battery application. J Power Sources 208:421–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dai J, Teng X, Song Y, Jiang X, Yin G (2016) A super thin polytetrafluoroethylene/sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) membrane with 91% energy efficiency and high stability for vanadium redox flow battery. J Appl Polym Sci 133:43593–43601Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Xiang Y, Lu S, Jiang SP (2012) Layer-by-layer self-assembly in the development of electrochemical energy conversion and storage devices from fuel cells to supercapacitors. Chem Soc Rev 41:7291–7321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Xi JY, Wu ZH, Teng XG, Zhao YT, Chen LQ, Qiu XP (2008) Self-assembled polyelectrolyte multilayer modified Nafion membrane with suppressed vanadium ion crossover for vanadium redox flow batteries. J Mater Chem 18:1232–1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang Y, Wang S, Xiao M, Han D, Hickner M, Meng Y (2013) Layer-by-layer self-assembly of PDDA/PSS-SPFEK composite membrane with low vanadium permeability for vanadium redox flow battery. RSC Adv 3:15467–15474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Joseph N, Ahmadiannamini P, Hoogenboom R, Vankelecom IFJ (2014) Layer-by-layer preparation of polyelectrolyte multilayer membranes for separation. Polym Chem 5:1817–1831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gu J, Lee S, Stafford CM, Lee JS, Choi W, Kim B, Baek K, Chan EP, Chung JY, Bang J, Lee J (2013) Molecular layer-by-layer assembled thin-film composite membranes for water desalination. Adv Mater 25:4778–4782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhang DZ, Jiang CX, Liu JJ, Cao YH (2017) Carbon monoxide gas sensing at room temperature using copper oxide-decorated graphene hybrid nanocomposite prepared by layer-by-layer self-assembly. Sens Actuat B Chem 247:875–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fenoy GE, Maza E, Zelaya E, Marmisolle WA, Azzaroni O (2017) Layer-by-layer assemblies of highly connected polyelectrolyte-capped-Pt nanoparticles for electrocatalysis of hydrogen evolution reaction. Appl Surf Sci 416:24–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Siqueira JR, Gabriel RC, Gasparotto LHS (2016) Layer-by-layer assembly of poly(vinylpyrrolidone)-embedded gold nanoparticles with carbon nanotubes for glycerol electro-oxidation. J Mater Sci 51:8323–8330.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0061-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tugba Camic B, Oytun F, Hasan Aslan M, Jeong Shin H, Choi H, Basarir F (2017) Fabrication of a transparent conducting electrode based on graphene/silver nanowires via layer-by-layer method for organic photovoltaic devices. J Colloid Interface Sci 505:79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Podgorna K, Jankowska K, Szczepanowicz K (2017) Polysaccharide gel nanoparticles modified by the Layer-by-Layer technique for biomedical applications. Colloid Surf A 519:192–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Huang H, Yao J, Chen H, Zeng X, Chen C, She X, Li L (2016) Facile preparation of halloysite/polyaniline nanocomposites via in situ polymerization and layer-by-layer assembly with good supercapacitor performance. J Mater Sci 51:4047–4054.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-9724-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wang Y, Wang S, Xiao M, Han D, Meng Y (2014) Preparation and characterization of a novel layer-by-layer porous composite membrane for vanadium redox flow battery (VRB) applications. Int J Hydrog Energy 39:16088–16095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lu S, Wu C, Liang D, Tan Q, Xiang Y (2014) Layer-by-layer self-assembly of Nafion-[CS-PWA] composite membranes with suppressed vanadium ion crossover for vanadium redox flow battery applications. RSC Adv 4:24831–24837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lin H, Yu TL, Huang L, Chen L, Shen K, Jung G (2005) Nafion/PTFE composite membranes for direct methanol fuel cell applications. J Power Sources 150:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kim J, Jeon J, Kwak S (2017) Sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) composite membranes containing microporous layered silicate AMH-3 for improved membrane performance in vanadium redox flow batteries. Electrochim Acta 243:220–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mohammadi T, Kazacos MS (1997) Evaluation of the chemical stability of some membranes in vanadium solution. J Appl Electrochem 27:153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Marine Science and TechnologyHarbin Institute of TechnologyWeihaiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations