Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 53, Issue 7, pp 4796–4805 | Cite as

Mechanical behavior of porous Si3N4 ceramics manufactured with 3D printing technology

  • S. A. Lurie
  • Y. O. Solyaev
  • L. N. Rabinskiy
  • P. O. Polyakov
  • I. Sevostianov
Ceramics
  • 57 Downloads

Abstract

The paper focuses on experimental measurement and analytical and numerical modeling of the elastic moduli of porous Si3N4 ceramics obtained by 3D printing and pressureless sintering. The pores in such a material have complex irregular shape and porosity varies over a wide range (up to 50%), depending on the technological parameters used. For analytical modeling, we use effective field methods (Mori–Tanaka–Benveniste and Maxwell homogenization schemes) recently developed for pores of superspherical shape. For FEM simulation, we used microstructures generated by overlapping solid spheres and overlapping spherical pores. It is shown that elastic properties of ceramics are largely determined by the granular structure and the concave pore shape, which have been observed in the ceramics microstructure after sintering of the 3D-printed powder green bodies.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial support from Russian Federal Targeted Program “Research and Development under Priority Areas of Russian Science and Technology on 2014–2020 years,” Agreement No. 14.577.21.0171 (identifier RFMEFI57715X0171) and NASA Cooperative Agreement NNX15AL51H to New Mexico State University are gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Rabinskiy LN, Ripetsky AV, Sitnikov SA, Solyaev YO, Kahramanov RM (2016) Fabrication of porous silicon nitride ceramics using binder jetting technology. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 140:012023.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/140/1/012023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rabinsky LN, Ripetsky AV, Sitnikov SA, Solyaev Y, Kahramanov RM, Babaitsev AV (2016) In: Binder jetting of Si3N4-based composite ceramics with different porosity, materials science and technology conference, additive manufacturing of composites and complex materials symposium, 2016, Solt Lake City, 23–27 OctGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rabinskiy LN, Ripetsky AV, Pogodin VA, Sitnikov SA, Solyaev YO (2017) Study of porous ceramic based on silicon nitride prepared using three-dimensional printing technology. Refract Ind Ceram 57:600–604.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11148-017-0030-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li X, Zhang L, Yin X (2012) Microstructure and mechanical properties of three porous Si3N4 ceramics fabricated by different techniques. Mater Sci Eng A 549:43–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.03.114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li X, Zhang L, Yin X (2012) Effect of chemical vapor infiltration of Si3N4 on the mechanical and dielectric properties of porous Si3N4 ceramic fabricated by a technique combining 3-D printing and pressureless sintering. Scr Mater 67:380–383.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.05.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Duan W, Yin X, Cao F et al (2015) Absorption properties of twinned SiC nanowires reinforced Si3N4 composites fabricated by 3D-printing. Mater Lett 159:257–260.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2015.06.106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gibson I, Rosen DW, Stucker B (2013) Additive manufacturing technologies. 3D-printing, rapid prototyping, and direct digital manufacturing. Springer, Berlin, p 499Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barmin A, Bortnikova V, Ivanov A, Kornev V, Lurie SA, Solyaev YO (2016) Microstructure and mechanical properties of silicon carbide ceramics reinforced with multi-walled carbon nanotubes. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 124:012142.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/124/1/012142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guo N, Leu MC (2013) Additive manufacturing: technology, applications and research needs. Front Mech Eng 8:215–243.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-013-0248-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eckel Zak C, Zhou Chaoyin, Martin JH, Jacobsen AJ, Carter WB, Schaedler TA (2016) Additive manufacturing of polymer-derived ceramics. Science 351:3–7.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad2688 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bai Y, Wagner G, Williams CB (2015) Effect of bimodal powder mixture on powder packing density and sintered density in binder jetting of metals. In: Annual international solid freeform fabrication symposium, p 62Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shrestha S, Manogharan G (2017) Optimization of binder jetting using Taguchi method. JOM, J Miner Met Mater Soc.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-2231-4 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen H, Zhao YF (2016) Process parameters optimization for improving surface quality and manufacturing accuracy of binder jetting additive manufacturing process. Rapid Prototyp J 22:527–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gonzalez JA, Mireles J, Lin Y, Wicker RB (2016) Characterization of ceramic components fabricated using binder jetting additive manufacturing technology. Ceram Int 42:10559–10564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kachanov M, Sevostianov I (2012) Rice’ s internal variables formalism and its implications for the elastic and conductive properties of cracked materials, and for the attempts to relate strength to stiffness. J Appl Mech 79:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bruno G, Kachanov M, Green DJ (2016) Microstructure-property connections for porous ceramics: the possibilities offered by micromechanics. J Am Ceram Soc 99:3829–3852.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.14624 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fu Z, Schlier L, Travitzky N, Greil P (2013) Three-dimensional printing of SiSiC lattice truss structures. Mater Sci Eng A.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.09.107 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Roberts AP, Garboczi EJ (2000) Elastic properties of model porous ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 83:3041–3048.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01680.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bruno G, Efremov AM, Levandovskyi AN, Clausen B (2011) Connecting the macro- and microstrain responses in technical porous ceramics: modeling and experimental validations. J Mater Sci 46:161–173.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-4899-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sadowski T, Samborski S (2003) Prediction of the mechanical behaviour of porous ceramics using mesomechanical modelling. Comput Mater Sci 28:512–517.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2003.08.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Giraud A, Sevostianov I (2013) Micromechanical modeling of the effective elastic properties of oolitic limestone. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 62:23–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.04.001 Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chen F, Sevostianov I, Giraud A, Grgic D (2015) Evaluation of the effective elastic and conductive properties of a material containing concave pores. Int J Eng Sci 97:60–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijengsci.2015.08.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sevostianov I, Giraud A (2012) On the compliance contribution tensor for a concave superspherical pore. Int J Fract 177:199–206.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-012-9754-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chen F, Sevostianov I, Giraud A, Grgic D (2017) Accuracy of the replacement relations for materials with non-ellipsoidal inhomogeneities. Int J Solids Struct 104–105:73–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.10.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mori T, Tanaka K (1973) Average stress in matrix and average elastic energy of materials with misfitting inclusions. Acta Metall 21:571–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Benveniste Y (1987) A new approach to the application of Mori–Tanaka’s theory in composite materials. Mech Mater 6:147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Benveniste Y (1990) Some remarks on three micromechanical models in composite media. J Appl Mech 57:474–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Maxwell JC (1873) A treatise on electricity and magnetism. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Open source 3DP 3D printer Plan B, http://ytec3d.com/plan-b/
  30. 30.
    Sevostianov I, Giraud A (2013) Generalization of Maxwell homogenization scheme for elastic material containing inhomogeneities of diverse shape. Int J Eng Sci 64:23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sevostianov I (2014) On the shape of effective inclusion in the Maxwell homogenization scheme for anisotropic elastic composites. Mech Mater 75:45–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hashin Z (1983) Analysis of composite-materials—a survey. J Appl Mech 50:481–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Stauffer D, Aharony A (1992) Introduction to percolation theory, 2nd edn. Taylor and Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sevostianov I, Kováčik J, Simančík F (2006) Elastic and electric properties of closed-cell aluminum foams. Cross-property connection. Mater Sci Eng A 420:87–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    McLaughlin R (1977) A study of the differential scheme for composite materials. Int J Eng Sci 15:237–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Vavakin AS, Salganik RL (1975) Effective characteristics of nonhomogeneous media with isolated inhomogeneities. Mech Solids 10(1975):65–75Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sevostianov I, Kachanov M (2007) Relations between compliances of inhomogeneities having the same shape but different elastic constants. Int J Eng Sci 45:797–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Trofimov A, Drach B, Sevostianov I (2017) Effective elastic properties of composites with particles of polyhedral shapes. Int J Solids Struct 120:157–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sevostianov I, Kachanov M (2010) Local minima and gradients of stiffness and conductivity as indicators of strength reduction of brittle-elastic materials. Int J Fract 164:147–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Applied Mechanics of Russian Academy of ScienceMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Moscow Aviation InstituteMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringNew Mexico State UniversityLas CrucesUSA
  4. 4.Center for Design, Manufacturing, and MaterialsSkolkovo Institute of Science and TechnologySkolkovoRussia

Personalised recommendations