Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 51, Issue 9, pp 4390–4398 | Cite as

An investigation into the effect of substrate on the load-bearing capacity of thin hard coatings

  • Chuan Ting Wang
  • Timo J. Hakala
  • Anssi Laukkanen
  • Helena Ronkainen
  • Kenneth Holmberg
  • Nong Gao
  • Robert J. K. Wood
  • Terence G. Langdon
Original Paper

Abstract

TiN and diamond-like carbon (DLC) coatings were deposited on Ti substrates with and without processing by high-pressure torsion (HPT). The HPT processing refined the grain size of titanium from the coarse-grained (CG) size of ~8.6 µm to the ultra-fine grained (UFG) size of ~130 nm and increased the hardness from ~1.83 to ~3.05 GPa. Scratch test results revealed that all the thin hard coatings had a higher critical load when deposited on the harder UFG Ti substrate compared to those deposited on the softer CG Ti. A three-dimensional finite element model (3D FEM) revealed that the improved load-carrying property of the thin hard coatings on the harder titanium substrates was related to the higher stresses generated within the substrate and its deformation behaviour which reduced the strain at the coating/substrate interface. A model based on the hardness of a two-layered composite was used to explain this effect, and it is shown that the model is reasonably successful in predicting the critical load of a wide range of coating–substrate systems. The analytical model and the results of the 3D FEM modelling emphasize the contribution of the substrate to the load-bearing capacity of thin coatings.

Keywords

Critical Load Indentation Depth Physical Vapour Deposition Scratch Test Track Width 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Miss A. Escudeiro and Prof A. Cavaleiro of University of Coimbra, Portugal, and Dr T. Polcar of University of Southampton, U.K., are gratefully appreciated for their assistance with the DLC-Zr coatings. This work was partially supported by the EPSRC under Grant No. EP/D00313X/1, the National Science Foundation of the United States under Grant No. DMR-1160966, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities No. 30915118812 (CTW and TGL) and the VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Ltd.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Holmberg K, Matthews A (2009) Coatings tribology. Elsevier, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oliveira VMCA, Aguiar C, Vazquez AM, Robin A, Barboza MJR (2014) Improving corrosion resistance of Ti-6Al-4V alloy through plasma-assisted PVD deposited nitride coatings. Corros Sci 88:317–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tkadletz M, Schalk N, Daniel R, Keckes J, Czettl C, Mitterer C (2016) Advanced characterization methods for wear resistant hard coatings: a review on recent progress. Surf Coat Technol 285:31–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wu G, Ding K, Zeng X, Wang X, Yao S (2009) Improving corrosion resistance of titanium-coated magnesium alloy by modifying surface characteristics of magnesium alloy prior to titanium coating deposition. Scr Mater 61:269–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wei QP, Yu ZM, Ma L, Yin DF, Ye J (2009) The effects of temperature on nanocrystalline diamond films deposited on WC–13wt% Co substrate with W-C gradient layer. Appl Surf Sci 256:1322–1328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Laukkanen A, Holmberg K, Koskinen J, Ronkainen H, Wallin K, Varjus S (2006) Tribological contact analysis of a rigid ball sliding on a hard coated surface, part III: fracture toughness calculation and influence of residual stresses. Surf Coat Technol 200:3824–3844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hainsworth SV, Soh WC (2003) The effect of the substrate on the mechanical properties of TiN coatings. Surf Coat Technol 163–164:515–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang TH, Huan Y (2004) Substrate effects on the micro/nanomechanical properties of TiN coatings. Tribol Lett 17:911–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang CT, Gao N, Wood RJK, Langdon TG (2011) Wear behavior of an aluminum alloy processed by equal-channel angular pressing. J Mater Sci 46:123–130. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4862-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Estrin Y, Vinogradov A (2013) Extreme grain refinement by severe plastic deformation: a wealth of challenging science. Acta Mater 61:782–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Langdon TG (2013) Twenty-five years of ultrafine-grained materials: achieving exceptional properties through grain refinement. Acta Mater 61:7035–7059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Valiev RZ, Langdon TG (2006) Principles of equal-channel angular pressing as a processing tool for grain refinement. Prog Mater Sci 51:881–981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhilyaev AP, Langdon TG (2008) Using high-pressure torsion for metal processing: fundamentals and applications. Prog Mater Sci 53:893–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang CT, Gao N, Gee MG, Wood RJK, Langdon TG (2013) Processing of an ultrafine-grained titanium by high-pressure torsion: an evaluation of the wear properties with and without a TiN coating. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 17:166–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang CT, Escudeiro A, Polcar T, Cavaleiro A, Wood RJK, Gao N, Langdon TG (2013) Indentation and scratch testing of DLC-Zr coatings on ultrafine-grained titanium processed by high-pressure torsion. Wear 306:304–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang CT, Gao N, Gee MG, Wood RJK, Langdon TG (2013) Tribology testing of ultrafine-grained Ti processed by high-pressure torsion with subsequent coating. J Mater Sci 47:4742–4748. doi: 10.1007/s10853-012-7110-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Holmberg K, Laukkanen A, Ronkainen H, Wallin K, Varjus S, Koskinen J (2006) Tribological contact analysis of a rigid ball sliding on a hard coated surface: part I: modelling stresses and strains. Surf Coat Technol 200:3793–3809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Holmberg K, Laukkanen A, Ronkainen H, Wallin K, Varjus S, Koskinen J (2006) Tribological contact analysis of a rigid ball sliding on a hard coated surface: part II: material deformations, influence of coating thickness and Young’s modulus. Surf Coat Technol 200:3810–3824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Holmberg K, Laukkanen A, Ronkainen H, Wallin K (2009) Surface stresses in coated steel surfaces—influence of a bond layer on surface fracture. Tribol Inter 42:137–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Figueiredo RB, Pereira PHR, Aguilar MTP, Cetlin PR, Langdon TG (2012) Using finite element modeling to examine the temperature distribution in quasi-constrained high-pressure torsion. Acta Mater 60:3190–3198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stallard J, Poulat S, Teer DG (2006) The study of the adhesion of a TiN coating on steel and titanium alloy substrates using a multi-mode scratch tester. Tribol Int 39:159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Holmberg K, Laukkanen A, Turunen E, Laitinen T (2014) Wear resistance optimisation of composite coatings by computational microstructural modelling. Surf Coat Technol 247:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang CT, Fox AG, Langdon TG (2014) Microstructural evolution in ultrafine-grained titanium processed by high-pressure torsion under different pressures. J Mater Sci 49:6558–6564. doi: 10.1007/s10853-014-8248-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rodrigo A, Ichimura H (2001) Analytical correlation of hardness and scratch adhesion for hard films. Surf Coat Technol 148:8–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ichimura H, Ishii Y (2003) Effects of indenter radius on the critical load in scratch testing. Surf Coat Technol 165:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kamminga JD, van Essen P, Hoy R, Janssen GCAM (2005) Substrate dependence of the scratch resistance of CrNx coatings on steel. Tribol Lett 19:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rodrigo A, Perillo P, Ichimura H (2000) On the correlation of substrate microhardness with the critical load of scratch adherence for hard coatings. Surf Coat Technol 124:87–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Burnett PJ, Rickerby DS (1987) The mechanical properties of wear resistant coatings: I: modelling of hardness behaviour. Thin Solid Films 148:41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ichimura H, Rodrigo A (2000) The correlation of scratch adhesion with composite hardness for TiN coatings. Surf Coat Technol 126:152–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kataria S, Kumar N, Dash S, Ramaseshan R, Tyagi AK (2010) Evolution of deformation and friction during multimode scratch test on TiN coated D9 steel. Surf Coat Technol 205:922–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chuan Ting Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Timo J. Hakala
    • 3
  • Anssi Laukkanen
    • 3
  • Helena Ronkainen
    • 3
  • Kenneth Holmberg
    • 3
  • Nong Gao
    • 4
  • Robert J. K. Wood
    • 4
  • Terence G. Langdon
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringNanjing University of Science & TechnologyNanjingChina
  2. 2.Departments of Aerospace & Mechanical Engineering and Materials ScienceUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.VTT Technical Research Centre of FinlandEspooFinland
  4. 4.Faculty of Engineering and the EnvironmentUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations