A model of the mechanical degradation of foam replicated scaffolds
- 468 Downloads
Tissue engineering scaffolds are implants that actively support tissue growth whilst providing mechanical support. For optimum functionality, they are designed to slowly dissolve in vivo so that no foreign material remains permanently implanted inside the body. The current study uses a simple degradation model that estimates the change of scaffold geometry due to surface erosion. This model is applied on scaffolds that have been manufactured using the foam replication method. In order to capture their complex geometry, micro-computed tomography scans of samples are obtained. Their change in geometry and degradation of mechanical properties is evaluated using computational analysis. The present investigation found that the mechanical properties such as the quasi-elastic gradient, 0.2 % offset yield stress and the plateau stress are decreased systematically over a 10-week period of immersion time. Deformation analysis on the titania foam scaffold is performed by means of the deformed model obtained from finite element calculations.
KeywordsSimulated Body Fluid Immersion Time Bioactive Glass Elastic Gradient Tissue Engineering Scaffold
This research was supported by the Australian Research Council through its Discovery Project DP130101377 “Structural design of third generation biomaterials”.
- 11.Menon A (2009) Sintering Additives for Nanocrystalline Titania and Processing of Porous Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds. University of Central Florida Orlando, FloridaGoogle Scholar
- 15.Karl S, Somers AV (1963) Method of making porous ceramic articles. Google Patents, 1963Google Scholar
- 17.Fu Q, Rahaman MN, Bal BS, Bonewald LF, Kuroki K, Brown RF (2010) Silicate, borosilicate, and borate bioactive glass scaffolds with controllable degradation rate for bone tissue engineering applications. II. In vitro and in vivo biological evaluation. J Biomed Mater Res A 95(1):172–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Tekkaya AE (2000) Relationship between Vickers Hardness and Yield Stress for Cold Formed Materials. Steel Res, 71(1)Google Scholar
- 38.Tabor D (1951) The hardness of metals, vol 10. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 41.I. Standard, ISO 13314:2011(E) (2011) Mechanical testing of metals—ductility testing—compression test for porous and cellular metals. Ref Number ISO 13314(13314):1–7Google Scholar