Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 51, Issue 5, pp 2608–2615 | Cite as

Phase transformation kinetics of ω-phase in pure Ti formed by high-pressure torsion

  • Nozomu Adachi
  • Yoshikazu Todaka
  • Kenshu Irie
  • Minoru Umemoto
Original Paper

Abstract

High-pressure torsion (HPT) process is the only method which can obtain a 100 vol% of high-pressure ω-phase sample at ambient condition in pure Ti. In this paper, the mechanism of ω-phase stabilization by the HPT process is discussed on the basis of the reverse phase transformation kinetics of ω-phase in pure titanium formed by the HPT process and then measured using electrical resistivity and calorimetric experiments. The single ω-phase sample showed much higher electrical resistivity of 0.95 μΩ m at 350 K compared with that of the single α-phase sample (0.62 μΩ m). The ω-to-α reverse transformation behavior was clearly observed through both electrical resistivity and calorimetric measurements. The activation energy for ω-to-α reverse transformation, derived from the kinetics, showed a value close to that for the self-diffusion of Ti. The ω-phase obtained after the HPT process has an equiaxed submicron microstructure. The microstructure of reverse transformed α-phase showed no evidence of the occurrence of martensitic transformation. These results suggest that the mechanism governing ω-to-α phase transformation changed from diffusionless martensitic transformation to diffusion-controlled transformation after severe plastic deformation using the HPT process.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Area, “Bulk Nanostructured Metals,” (Contract No. 22102002) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan. The neutron diffraction experiments were performed using the RESA-1 diffractometer of JRR-3 with the approval of the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (Proposal No. 2008B-A08).

References

  1. 1.
    Jamieson JC (1963) Crystal structures of titanium, zirconium, and hafnium at high pressures. Science 140:72–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jayaraman A, Klement W Jr, Kennedy GC (1963) Solid-solid transitions in titanium and zirconium at high pressures. Phys Rev 131:644–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sargent G, Conrad H (1971) Formation of the omega phase in titanium by hydrostatic pressure soaking. Mater Sci Eng 7:220–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zilberstein VA, Nosova GI, Estrin EI (1973) Alpha–omega transformation in titanium and zirconium. Phys Met Metall 35:128–133Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zilberstein VA, Chistotina NP, Zharov AA, Grishina NS, Estrin EI (1975) Alpha–omega transformation in titanium and zirconium during shear deformation under pressure. Phys Met Metall 39:208–211Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gu G, Vohra YK, Brister KE (1994) Phase transformation in titanium induced by laser heating at high pressure. Scr Metall Mater 31:167–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xia H, Duclos SJ, Ruoff AL, Vohra YK (1990) New high-pressure phase transition in zirconium metal. Phys Rev Lett 64:204–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ahuja R, Dubrovinsky L, Dubrovinskaia N, Guillen JMO, Mattesini M, Johansson B, Bihan TL (2004) Titanium metal at high pressure: synchrotron experiment and ab initio calculations. Phys Rev B 69:184102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vohra YK, Spencer PT (2001) Novel γ-Phase of titanium metal at megabar pressures. Phys Rev Lett 86:3068–3071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Akahama Y, Kawamura H, Bihan TL (2001) New δ (distorted-bcc) titanium to 220 GPa. Phys Rev Lett 87:275503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Silcock JM (1958) An X-ray examination of the ω phase in TiV, TiMo and TiCr alloys. Acta Metall 6:481–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rabinkin A, Talianker M, Botstein O (1981) Crystallography and a model of the αω phase transformation in zirconium. Acta Metall 29:691–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Usikov MP, Zilbershtein VA (1973) The orientation relationship between the α- and ω-phases of titanium and zirconium. Phys Stat Sol A 19:53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kutsar AR (1975) T-p diagram of hafnium, and phase transitions in shock waves. Phys Met Metall 40:89–95Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Song SG, Gray GT III (1991) Microscopic and crystallographic aspects of retained omega phase in shock-loaded zirconium and its formation mechanism. Phil Mag A 71:275–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Trinkle DR, Hennig RG, Srinivasan SG, Hatch DM, Jones MD, Stokes HT, Albers RC, Wilkins JM (2003) New mechanism for the α to ω martensitic transformation in pure titanium. Phys Rev Lett 91:025701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Duvall GE, Graham RA (1977) Phase transitions under shock-wave loading. Rev Mod Phys 49:523–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gray GT III (1998) Shock-induced defects in bulk materials. Mat Res Soc Symp Proc 499:87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Todaka Y, Sasaki J, Moto T, Umemoto M (2008) Bulk submicrocrystalline ω-Ti produced by high-pressure torsion straining. Scr Mater 59:615–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pérez-Prado MT, Gimazov AA, Ruano OA, Kassner ME, Zhilyaev AP (2008) Bulk nanocrystalline ω-Zr by high-pressure torsion. Scr Mater 58:219–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pérez-Prado MT, Zhilyaev AP (2009) First experimental observation of shear induced hcp to bcc transformation in pure Zr. Phys Rev Lett 102:175504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Todaka Y, Azuma H, Ohnishi Y, Suzuki H, Umemoto M (2010) Influence of strain amount on stabilization of ω-phase in pure Ti by severe plastic deformation under high-pressure torsion. J Phys 240:012113Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Adachi N, Todaka Y, Suzuki H, Umemoto M (2015) Orientation relationship between α-phase and high-pressure ω-phase of pure group IV transition metals. Scr Mater 98:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tane M, Okuda Y, Todaka Y, Ogi H, Nagakubo A (2013) Elastic properties of single-crystalline ω phase in titanium. Acta Mater 61:7543–7554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kissinger HM (1957) Reaction kinetics in differential thermal analysis. Anal Chem 29:1702–1706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Low TSE, Brown DW, Weik BA, Cerreta EK, Okasinski JS, Niezgoda SR (2015) Isothermal annealing of shocked zirconium: stability of the two-phase α/ω microstructure. Acta Mater 91:101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cerreta E, Gray GT III, Lawson AC, Mason TA, Morris CE (2006) The influence of oxygen content on the to phase transformation and shock hardening of titanium. J Appl Phys 100:013530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hood GM, Schultz RJ (1972) Ultra-fast solute diffusion in α-Ti and α-Zr. Phil Mag 26:329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Horvath J, Dyment F, Mehrer H (1984) Anomalous self-diffusion in a single crystal of α-zirconium. J Nucl Mater 126:206–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dyment F (1980) Self and solute diffusion in titanium and titanium alloys. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Titanium, 1:519–528Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Libanati CM, Dyment SF (1963) Self diffusion of alpha-titanium. Acta Metall 11:1263–1268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dyment F, Libanati CM (1968) Self-diffusion of Ti, Zr, and Hf in their hcp phases, and diffusion of Nb95 in hcp Zr. J Mater Sci 3:349–359. doi:10.1007/BF00550978 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Miyazaki S, Otsuka K (1986) Deformation and transition behavior associated with the R-phase in Ti-Ni alloys. Metall Trans A 17:53–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Miyazaki S, Kimura S, Otsuka K, Suzuki Y (1984) The habit plane and transformation strains associated with the martensitic transformation in Ti-Ni single crystals. Scr Metall 18:883–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Miyazaki S, Kim HY (2007) TiNi-base and Ti-base shape memory alloys. Mater Sci Forum 561–565:5–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tomimura K, Takaki S, Tanimoto S, Tokunaga Y (1991) Optimal chemical composition in Fe-Cr-Ni alloys for ultra grain refining by reversion from deformation induced martensite. ISIJ Int 31:721–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Maki T, Tomota Y, Tamura I (1974) Effect of grain size on the transformation-induced plasticity in metastable austenitic Fe-Ni-C alloy. J Jpn Inst Met 38:871–876Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Takaki S, Nakatsu H, Tokunaga Y (1993) Effects of austenite grain size on ε martensitic transformation in Fe-15mass%Mn alloy. Mater Trans 34:489–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nozomu Adachi
    • 1
  • Yoshikazu Todaka
    • 1
  • Kenshu Irie
    • 2
    • 3
  • Minoru Umemoto
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringToyohashi University of TechnologyTempakuJapan
  2. 2.Department of Production System EngineeringToyohashi University of TechnologyTempakuJapan
  3. 3.IHI Co. LtdTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations