Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 50, Issue 6, pp 2502–2509 | Cite as

Molecular dynamics of ionic self-diffusion at an MgO grain boundary

  • Fabio Landuzzi
  • Luca Pasquini
  • Simone Giusepponi
  • Massimo Celino
  • Amelia Montone
  • Pier Luca Palla
  • Fabrizio Cleri
Original Paper


The characterization of self-diffusion in MgO grain boundaries is a materials science problem of general interest, being relevant to the stability and reactivity of MgO layers in artificial nanostructures as well as to the understanding of mass transport and morphological evolution in polycrystalline metal oxides which are employed in many technological applications. In addition, atomic transport in MgO is a key factor to describe the rheology of the Earth’s lower mantle. In this work, we tackle the problem using a classical molecular dynamics model and finite-temperature simulations. To this purpose, we first design a stable grain boundary structure, which is meant to be representative of general internal interfaces in nanocrystalline MgO. The Mg and O self-diffusion coefficients along this grain boundary are then determined as a function of temperature by calculating the mean-square ionic displacement in the boundary region. Two different diffusion regimes at low and high temperature are identified, allowing to obtain the relevant activation enthalpies for migration from the temperature dependance of the diffusion coefficients. Our results prove that Mg diffusion along MgO grain boundaries is sufficiently fast to explain the recently reported development of MgO hollow structures during repeated hydrogen sorption cycles in Mg/MgO nanoparticles.


Activation Enthalpy Symmetric Tilt Magnesium Hydride Migration Enthalpy Major Groof 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Computational resources and technical support have been provided by the CRESCO ENEA-GRID High-Performance Computing infrastructure and staff. CRESCO is funded by ENEA and by national and European research programs. Additional computational resources were provided by EDARI/CINES Montpellier, under contract x2014077225 (Nanomaterials for Hydrogen storage) to FC. We gratefully acknowledge partial financial support by the COST Action MP1103 “Nanostructured materials for solid-state hydrogen storage.” FL thanks the kind hospitality of IEMN-CNRS and partial support for extended visits.


  1. 1.
    Sutton AP, Balluffi RW (1995) Interfaces in crystalline materials. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harding JH (2003) Short-circuit diffusion in ceramics. Interface Sci 11:81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yan Y, Chisholm MF, Duscher G, Maiti A, Pennycook SJ, Pantelides ST (1998) Atomic structure of a Ca-doped [001] tilt grain boundary in MgO. Phys Rev Lett 81:3675–3678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wynblatt P, Rohrer GS, Papillon F (2003) Grain boundary segregation in oxide ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc 23:2841–2848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Osenbach JW, Stubican VS (1983) Grain-boundary diffusion of 51Cr in MgO and Cr-doped MgO. J Am Ceram Soc 66:191–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harris DJ, Watson GW, Parker SC (1997) Vacancy migration at the {410}/[001] symmetric tilt grain boundary of MgO: an atomistic simulation study. Phys Rev B 56:11477–11484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harris DJ, Watson GW, Parker SC (2001) Atomistic simulation studies on the effect of pressure on diffusion at the MgO 410/[001] tilt grain boundary. Phys Rev B 64:134101–134108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McKenna KP, Shluger AL (2009) First-principles calculations of defects near a grain boundary in MgO. Phys Rev B 79:224116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Verma AK, Karki BB (2010) First-principles simulations of MgO tilt grain boundary: structure and vacancy formation at high pressure. Am Mineral 95:1035–1041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vočadlo L, Wall A, Parker SC, Price GD (1995) Absolute ionic diffusion in MgO computer calculations via lattice dynamics. Phys Earth Planet Inter 88:193–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ita J, Cohen RE (1998) Diffusion in MgO at high pressure: implications for lower mantle rheology. Geophys Res Lett 25:1095–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Van Orman JA, Fei Y, Hauri EH, Wang J (2003) Diffusion in MgO at high pressures: constraints on deformation mechanisms and chemical transport at the core-mantle boundary. Geophys Res Lett 30:1056–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Niu K-Y, Yang J, Sun J, Du X-W (2010) One-step synthesis of MgO hollow nanospheres with blue emission. Nanotechnology 21:295604–295608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yin Y, Rioux RM, Erdonmez CK, Hughes S, Somorjai GA, Alivisatos AP (2004) Formation of hollow nanocrystals through the nanoscale Kirkendall effect. Science 304:711–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pasquini L, Montone A, Callini E, Vittori Antisari M, Bonetti E (2011) Formation of hollow structures through diffusive phase transition across a membrane. Appl Phys Lett 99:021911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mirabile Gattia D, Montone A, Pasquini L (2013) Microstructure and morphology changes in MgH2/expanded natural graphite pellets upon hydrogen cycling. Int J Hydrogen Energy 38:1918–1924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yang MH, Flynn CP (1994) Intrinsic diffusion properties of an oxide: MgO. Phys Rev Lett 73:1809–1812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Callini E, Pasquini L, Piscopiello E, Montone A, Vittori Antisari M, Bonetti E (2009) Hydrogen sorption in Pd-decorated Mg-MgO core-shell nanoparticles. Appl Phys Lett 94:221905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Keblinski P, Wolf D, Phillpot SR, Gleiter H (1997) Amorphous structure of grain boundaries and grain junctions in nanocrystalline silicon by molecular-dynamics simulation. Acta Mater 45:987–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Keblinski P, Wolf D, Phillpot SR, Gleiter H (1997) Continuous thermodynamic-equilibriumglass transition in high-energy grain boundaries? Philos Mag Lett 76:143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sangster MJL, Peckham G, Saunderson DH (1970) Lattice dynamics of magnesium oxide. J Phys C 3:1026–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lewis GV, Catlow CRA (1985) Potential models for ionic oxides. J Phys C 18:1149–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Catlow CRA, Faux ID, Norgett MJ (1976) Shell and breathing shell model calculations for defect formation energies and volumes in magnesium oxide. J Phys C 9:419–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stoneham AM, Harding JH (1986) Interatomic potential in solid state chemistry. Annu Rev Phys Chem 37:53–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gale JD, Rohl AL (2003) The general utility lattice program. Mol Simulat 29:291–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Smith W, Forester T (1996) DL\_POLY\_2.0: a general-purpose parallel molecular dynamics simulation package. J Mol Graph 14:136–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Smith W (2006) Guest Editorial: DL\_POLY-applications to molecular simulation II. Mol Simulat 32:933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    DL\_POLY code:
  29. 29.
    Wolf D, Jaszscak JA (1992) Role of interface dislocations and surface steps in the work of adhesion. In: Wolf D, Yip S (eds) Materials interfaces: atomic-level structure and properties. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 662–690Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Phillpot SR, Keblinski P, Wolf D, Cleri F (1999) Synthesis and characterization of a polycrystalline ionic thin film by large-scale molecular-dynamics simulation. Interface Sci 7:15–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Saylor DM, Morawiec A, Rohrer GS (2003) Distribution of grain boundaries in magnesia as a function of five macroscopic parameters. Acta Mater 51:3663–3674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mishin Y, Herzig C (1999) Grain boundary diffusion: recent progress and future research. Mater Sci Eng A260:55–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Balluffi RW, Allen SM, Carter WC (2005) Kinetics of materials. John Wiley & Sons, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fabio Landuzzi
    • 1
  • Luca Pasquini
    • 1
  • Simone Giusepponi
    • 2
  • Massimo Celino
    • 2
  • Amelia Montone
    • 2
  • Pier Luca Palla
    • 3
  • Fabrizio Cleri
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Physics and Astronomy and CNISMUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly
  2. 2.ENEA, C. R. CasacciaRomaItaly
  3. 3.Institut d’Eléctronique, Microélectronique et Nanotechnologie (UMR CNRS 8520), Université de Lille IVilleneuve d’AscqFrance

Personalised recommendations