Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 49, Issue 23, pp 8127–8139 | Cite as

Migration mechanisms of helium in copper and tungsten

  • César GonzálezEmail author
  • Roberto Iglesias
Original Paper


A complete set of migration energies for a He atom moving inside the bulk of the bcc-W and fcc-Cu crystals has been calculated in different configurations using the nudged elastic band method as a tool within the density functional theory formalism. Although the most stable site in the perfect crystal is the tetrahedral position in both cases, the He atoms jump preferentially between two first nearest tetrahedral positions in tungsten, while they migrate through an octahedral position in the case of Cu. As reported before, the He atoms are trapped when they find an n-vacancy. Our results show that the migration energies are lower when the n-vacancies do not contain He atoms, suggesting that vacancies are stabilized and their mobility is reduced by helium trapping, that may end up in bubble coalescence, in agreement with previous findings. The migration energy of the clean n-vacancy decreases as the number n increases, at least up to n = 3, while the situation when He atoms are inside the vacancies is a little bit more complicated. In all the analyzed cases, the energy barriers in W are higher than in Cu. Additionally, a complete analysis of the evolution of the electronic density of states has been performed, that leads to the confirmation of a non-negligible He–metal interaction that significantly contributes to the trapping of helium atoms inside the n-vacancies.


Fermi Level Energy Barrier Octahedral Site Migration Process Migration Energy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This work has been supported by the FP7 project RADINTERFACES and the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness project NANO-EXTREM, Ref. MAT2012-38541. Angel Gutiérrez at the UNIOVI Scientific Modelling Cluster is gratefully acknowledged for technical help and CPU time. Some calculations have been performed thanks to the support provided by the Spanish Supercomputing Network (RES) through the Project FI-2014-1-0008.

Supplementary material

10853_2014_8522_MOESM1_ESM.mpg (504 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (MPG 504 kb)
10853_2014_8522_MOESM2_ESM.mpg (574 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (MPG 574 kb)
10853_2014_8522_MOESM3_ESM.mpg (742 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (MPG 742 kb)

Supplementary material 4 (MPG 952 kb)

10853_2014_8522_MOESM5_ESM.mpg (838 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (MPG 838 kb)
10853_2014_8522_MOESM6_ESM.mpg (660 kb)
Supplementary material 6 (MPG 660 kb)


  1. 1.
    Demkowicz MJ, Hoagland RG, Hirth JP (2008) Interface structure and radiation damage resistance in Cu-Nb multilayer nanocomposites. Phys Rev Lett 100:136102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hattar K, Demkowicz MJ, Misra A, Robertson IM, Hoagland RG (2008) Arrest of He bubble growth in CuNb multilayer nanocomposites. Scr Mater 58:541–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Demkowicz MJ, Misra A, Caro A (2012) The role of interface structure in controlling high helium concentrations. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 16:101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gao Y, Yang T, Xue J, Yan S, Zhou S, Wanga Y, Kwok DTK, Chu PK, Zhang Y (2011) Radiation tolerance of Cu/W multilayered nanocomposites. J Nucl Mater 413:11–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Becquart CS, Domain C (2006) Migration energy of He in W revisited by Ab initio calculations. Phys Rev Lett 97:196402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Becquart CS, Domain C (2009) An object kinetic Monte Carlo simulation of the dynamics of helium and point defects in tungsten. J Nucl Mater 385:223–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Becquart CS, Domain C (2007) Ab initio calculations about intrinsic point defects and He in W. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 225:23–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Becquart CS, Domain C, Sarkar U, DeBacker A, Hou M (2010) Microstructural evolution of irradiated tungsten: Ab initio parameterisation of an OKMC model. J Nucl Mater 403:75–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li X-C, Shu X, Liu Y-N, Yu Y, Gao F, Lu G-H (2012) Analytical WHe and HHe interatomic potentials for a WHHe system. J Nucl Mater 426:31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Henriksson KOE, Nordlund K, Keinonen J, Sundholm D, Patzschle M (2004) Simulations of the initial stages of blistering in helium implanted tungsten. Phys Scr T108:95–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Henriksson KOE, Nordlund K, Keinonen J (2006) Molecular dynamics simulations of helium cluster formation in tungsten. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect B 244:377–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Amano J, Seidman D (1984) Diffusivity of 3He atoms in perfect tungsten crystals. J Appl Phys 56:983–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wagner A, Seidman DN (1979) Range profiles of 300- and 475-eV He+4 ions and the diffusivity of He4 in tungsten. Phys Rev Lett 42:515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Juslin N, Wirth BD (2013) Interatomic potentials for simulation of He bubble formation in W. J Nucl Mater 432:61–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Juslin N, Nordlund K (2008) Pair potential for FeHe. J Nucl Mater 382:143–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Terentyev D, Juslin N, Nordlund K, Sandberg N (2009) Fast three dimensional migration of He clusters in bcc Fe and FeCr alloys. J Appl Phys 105:103509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ventelon L, Willaime F, Fu C-C, Heran M, Ginoux I (2012) Ab initio investigation of radiation defects in tungsten: structure of self-interstitials and specificity of di-vacancies compared to other bcc transition metals. J Nucl Mater 425:16–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lam NQ, Doan NV, Dagens L (1985) Multiple defects in copper and silver. J Phys F 15:799–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sabochick MJ, Yip S (1988) Migration energy calculations for small vacancy clusters in copper. J Phys F 18:1689–1701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhao P, Shimomura Y (1999) Molecular dynamics calculations of properties of the selfinterstitials in copper and nickel. Comp Mat Sci 14:84–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wilson WD, Baskes MI, Bisson CL (1976) Atomistics of helium bubble formation in a face-centeretl-cubic metal. Phys Rev B 13:2470–2478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang L, Ning X-J (2003) Molecular dynamics simulations of helium behaviour in copper crystals. Chin Phys Lett 20:1416–1419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Evans JH, Escobar Galindo R (2004) A description of bubble growth and gas release during thermal annealing of helium implanted copper. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 217:276–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kashinath A, Demkowicz MJ (2011) A predictive interatomic potential for He in Cu and Nb. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 19:035007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dunn AY, McPhie MG, Capolungo L, Martínez E, Cherkaoui M (2013) A rate theory study of helium bubble formation and retention in CuNb nanocomposites. J Nucl Mater 435:141–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    González C, Fernández-Pello D, Cerdeira MA, Palacios SL, Iglesias R (2014) Helium bubble clustering in copper from first principles. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 22:035019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kresse G, Hafner J (1993) Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys Rev B 47:R558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kresse G, Furthmuller JJ (1996) Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B 54:11169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kresse G, Joubert D (1999) From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 59:1758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77:3865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Blöchl PE (1994) Projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 50:17953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    James AM, Lord MP (1992) Macmillan’s chemical and physical data. Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jonsson H, Mills G, Jacobsen KW (1998) Nudged elastic band method for finding minimum energy paths of transitions. In: Berne BJ, Ciccotti G, Coker DF (eds) Classical and quantum dynamics in condensed phase simulations. World Scientific, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Henkelman G, Jonsson H (2000) Improved tangent estimate in the nudged elastic band method for finding minimum energy paths and saddle points. J Chem Phys 113:9978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    See Supplemental Material with the movies of the different migration processes: movie1 shows the tetrahedral to octahedral migration in Cu, movie2 shows the tetrahedral to tetrahedral movement in Cu, movie3/movie4 show the movement of the HeV complex in Cu/W, and movie5/movie6 show the same for the complex HeV 2 Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Balluffi RW (1978) Vacancy defect mobilities and binding energies obtained from annealing studies. J Nucl Mater 69–70:240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ullmaier H, Schilling W (1980) Radiation damage in metallic reactor materials, in physics of modern materials, vol I. IAEA, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wilson WD, Johnson RD (1972) Rare gases in metals. In: Gehlen PC, Beeler JR Jr, Jaffee RI (eds) Interatomic potentials and simulation of lattice defects. Plenum, New York, p 375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kornelsen EV, Van Gorkum AA (1990) A study of bubble nucleation in tungsten using thermal desorption spectrometry: clusters of 2 to 100 helium atoms. J Nucl Mater 92:79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Samaras M (2009) Multiscale modelling: the role of helium in iron. Mater Today 12:46–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Becquart CS, Domain C (2012) Solutepoint defect interactions in bcc systems: focus on first principles modelling in W and RPV steels. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 16:115–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    You YW, Kong XS, Wua XB, Fang QF, Chen JL, Luo GN, Liu CS (2013) Effect of vacancy on the dissolution and diffusion properties of hydrogen and helium in molybdenum. J Nucl Mater 433:167–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Was GS (2007) Fundamentals of radiation materials science. Springer, New York 356Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mundy JN, Ockers ST, Smedskjaer LC (1987) Vacancy migration enthalpy in tungsten at high temperatures. Philos Mag A 56:851–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Dai Y, Odette GR, Yamamoto T (2012) The effects of helium in irradiated structural alloys in Konings RJM in comprehensive nuclear materials. Elsevier, Amsterdam 141Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Trocellier P, Agarwal S, Miro S (2014) A review on helium mobility in inorganic materials. J Nucl Mater 445:128–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Caturla MJ, Soneda N, Alonso E, Wirth BD, Perlado JM (2000) Comparative study of radiation damage accumulation in Cu and Fe. J Nucl Mater 276:13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Caturla MJ, Soneda N, Fluss M (2006) Kinetic Monte Carlo simulations applied to irradiated materials: the effect of cascade damage in defect nucleation and growth. J Nucl Mater 351:78–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Akbarzadeh AR, Chen ZZ, Kioussis N (2009) Crucial role of surface in stability and mobility of vacancy clusters in metals. Phys Rev B 79:195404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ullmaier H (1991) In: Landolt-Bornstein Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology, New Series, vol III/25. Springer, Berlin. p 381Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Derlet PM, Nguyen-Manh D, Dudarev SL (2007) Multiscale modeling of crowdion and vacancy defects in body-centered-cubic transition metals. Phys Rev B 76:054107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hu W, Shu W, Zhang B (2002) Point-defect properties in body-centered cubic transition metals with analytic EAM interatomic potentials. Comput Mater Sci 23:175–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Zinkle SJ, Busby JT (2008) Structural materials for fission and fusion energy. Mater Today 12:12–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    van Veen A (1987) Thermal helium desorption spectrometry (THDS) as a tool for the study of vacancies and self-interstitials. Mater Sci Forum 15–18:3–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de FísicaUniversidad de OviedoOviedoSpain

Personalised recommendations