Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 49, Issue 23, pp 7933–7942 | Cite as

45S5 bioactive glass coatings by atmospheric plasma spraying obtained from feedstocks prepared by different routes

  • Verónica López Calvo
  • Mónica Vicent CabedoEmail author
  • Emilie Bannier
  • Eugeni Cañas Recacha
  • Aldo R. Boccaccini
  • Luis Cordero Arias
  • Enrique Sánchez Vilches
Original Paper


45S5 bioactive glass powders with the composition of 45 SiO2, 6 P2O5, 24.5 CaO and 24.5 wt% Na2O were melted and quenched in water to obtain a frit. The frit was milled using two different routes: dry milling followed by sieving to obtain glass particles and wet milling followed by spray drying to obtain a powder comprising porous agglomerates. All feedstocks showed adequate characteristics that make them suitable to be deposited by atmospheric plasma spraying. The powders and coatings were characterised by field-emission gun environmental scanning electron microscope and X-ray diffraction. The roughness and the contact angle of the coatings were also determined. The bioactivity of the powders and coatings was assessed by immersion in simulated body fluid. It was found that bioactive glass prepared from bioglass frit by dry milling exhibited similar bioactivity as that of a commercial bioactive glass. All coatings produced showed good adhesion to the substrate as well as suitable surface properties to ensure efficient contact with body fluid. Regardless of the characteristics of the feedstocks or plasma spray conditions used, all coatings were exclusively made up of an amorphous phase. On the other hand, micrographs revealed that the characteristics of the feedstock strongly impact on the final coating microstructure. The most homogeneous microstructure was obtained when the feedstock was prepared by fine dry grinding of the frit. For this coating, the formation of a bioactive layer was also proved by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction.


Contact Angle Simulated Body Fluid Bioactive Glass Atmospheric Plasma Spray Hausner Ratio 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Authors wish to acknowledge KMM-VIN European Virtual Institute on Knowledge-Based Multifunctional Materials AISBL by the funding support in a mobility grant and the University Jaume I of Castellón for the support in the project P1 1B2013-69.


  1. 1.
    Jones JR (2013) Review of bioactive glass: from hench to hybrids. Acta Biomater 9:4457–4486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hench LL (2006) The story of bioglass. J Mater Sci Mater Med 17:967–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gerhardt LC, Boccaccini AR (2010) Bioactive glass and glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Materials 3:3867–3910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cao W, Hench LL (1996) Bioactive materials. Ceram Int 22:493–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lucas-Girot A, Mezahi FZ, Mami M, Oudadesse H, Harabi A, Floch ML (2011) Sol–gel synthesis of a new composition of bioactive glass in the quaternary system SiO2-CaO-Na2O-P2O5 comparison with melting method. J Non-Cryst Solids 357:3322–3327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sepulveda P, Jones JR, Hench LL (2002) In vitro dissolution of melt-derived 45S5 and sol-gel derived 58S bioactive glasses. J Biomed Mater Res 61:301–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhou Y, Li H, Lin K, Zhai W, Gu W, Chang J (2012) Effect of heat treatment on the properties of SiO2-CaO-MgO-P2O5 bioactive glasses. J Mater Sci Mater Med 23:2101–2108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saboori A, Rabiee M, Moztarzadeh F, Sheikhi M, Tahriri M, Karimi M (2009) Synthesis, characterization and in vitro bioactivity of sol-gel-derived SiO2-CaO-P2O5-MgO bioglass. Mater Sci Eng C 29:335–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ma J, Chen CZ, Wang DG, Meng XG, Shi JZ (2010) Influence of the sintering temperature on the structural feature and bioactivity of sol–gel derived SiO2-CaO-P2O5 bioglass. Ceram Int 36:1911–1916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brink M, Turunen T, Happonen R, Yli-Urpo A (1997) Compositional dependence of bioactivity of glasses in the system Na2O-K2O-MgO-CaO-B2O3-P2O5-SiO2. J Biomed Mater Res 37:114–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Delben JRJ, Pereira K, Oliveira SL, Alencar LDS, Hernandes AC, Delben AAST (2013) Bioactive glass prepared by sol–gel emulsion. J Non-Cryst Solids 361:119–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ding SJ, Su YM, Ju CP, Chern Lin JH (2001) Structure and immersion behavior of plasma-sprayed apatite-matrix coatings. Biomaterials 22:833–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee TM, Chang E, Wang BC, Yang CY (1996) Characteristics of plasma sprayed bioactive glass coatings on Ti-6Al-4 V alloy: an in vitro study. Surf Coat Technol 79:170–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vicent M, Sánchez E, Moreno A, Moreno R (2012) Preparation of high solids content nano-titania suspensions to obtain spray-dried nanostructured powders for atmospheric plasma spraying. J Eur Ceram Soc 32:185–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vicent M, Sánchez E, Mallol G, Moreno R (2013) Study of colloidal behaviour and rheology of Al2O3-TiO2 nanosuspensions to obtain free-flowing spray-dried granules for atmospheric plasma spraying. Ceram Int 39:8103–8111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Amorós JL, Blasco A, Enrique JE, Negre F (1987) Características de polvos cerámicos para prensado (Characteristics of ceramic powders for pressing). Bol Soc Esp Ceram Vidr 26:31–37Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kokubo T, Takadama H (2006) How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials 27:2907–2915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mackovic M, Hoppe A, Detsch R, Mohn D, Stark WJ, Spiecker E, Boccaccini AR (2012) Bioactive glass (type 45S5) nanoparticles: in vitro reactivity on nanoscale and biocompatibility. J Nanopart Res 14:966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sepúlveda P, Jones J, Hench LL (2001) Characterization of melt-derived 45S5 and sol–gel derived 58S bioactive glasses. J Biomed Mater Res 58:734–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fauchais P, Montavon G, Bertrand G (2010) From powders to thermally sprayed coatings. J Therm Spray Technol 19:56–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    El-Kheshen AA, Khaliafa FA, Saad EA, Elwan RL (2008) Effect of Al2O3 addition on bioactivity, thermal and mechanical properties of some bioactive glasses. Ceram Int 34:1667–1673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nelson GM, Nychka JA, McDonald AG (2011) Flame spray deposition of titanium alloy-bioactive glass composite coatings. J Therm Spray Technol. doi: 10.1007/s11666-011-9674-5 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chen Q, Cordero-Arias L, Roether JA, Cabanas-Polo S, Virtanen S, Boccaccini AR (2013) Alginate/Bioglass® composite coatings on stainless steel deposited by direct current and alternating current electrophoretic deposition. Surf Coat Technol 233:49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Peitl Filho O, LaTorre GP, Hench LL (1996) Effect of crystallization on apatite-layer formation of bioactive glass 45S5. J Biomed Mater Res B 30:509–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pawlowski L (2008) The science and engineering of thermal spray coatings, 2nd edn. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Poirier T, Planche MP, Landemarre O, Coddet C (2008) Particles spreading phenomena in the case of glass thermal spraying. J Therm Spray Technol 17:564–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fauchais P, Montavon G, Lima RS, Marple BR (2011) Engineering a new class of thermal spray nano-based microstructures from agglomerated nanostructured particles, suspensions and solutions: an invited review. J Phys D Appl Phys 44:093001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Costa-Rodrigues J, Fernandes A, Lopes MA, Fernandes MH (2012) Hydroxyapatite surface roughness: complex modulation of the osteoclastogenesis of human precursor cells. Acta Biomat 8:1137–1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cattini A, Latka L, Belluci D, Bolelli G, Sola A, Lusvarghi L, Pawlowski L, Canillo V (2013) Suspension plasma sprayed bioactive glass coatings: effects of processing on microstructure, mechanical properties and in vitro behaviour. Surf Coat Technol 220:52–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Monsalve M, Ageorges H, López E, Vargas F, Bolívar F (2013) Bioactivity and mechanical properties of plasma-sprayed coatings of bioglass powders. Surf Coat Technol 220:60–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Verónica López Calvo
    • 1
  • Mónica Vicent Cabedo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Emilie Bannier
    • 1
  • Eugeni Cañas Recacha
    • 1
  • Aldo R. Boccaccini
    • 2
  • Luis Cordero Arias
    • 2
  • Enrique Sánchez Vilches
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de Tecnología Cerámica (ITC), Asociación de Investigación de las Industrias Cerámicas (AICE)Universitat Jaume I (UJI)CastellónSpain
  2. 2.Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of BiomaterialsUniversity of Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU)ErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations