Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 49, Issue 5, pp 2154–2163 | Cite as

Experimental study and numerical simulation of the vertical bounce of a polymer ball over a wide temperature range

Article

Abstract

The dependence to temperature of the rebound of a solid polymer ball on a rigid slab is investigated. An acrylate polymer ball is brought to a wide range of temperatures, covering its glass to rubbery transition, and let fall on a granite slab while the coefficient of restitution, duration of contact, and force history are measured experimentally. The ball fabrication is controlled in the lab, allowing the mechanical characterization of the material by classic dynamic mechanical analysis. Finite element simulations of the rebound at various temperatures are run, considering the material as viscoelastic and as satisfying a WLF equation for its time–temperature superposition property. A comparison between the experiments and the simulations shows the strong link between viscoelasticity and time–temperature superposition properties of the material and the bounce characteristics of the ball.

References

  1. 1.
    Cross R (1999) The bounce of a ball. Am J Phys 67:222–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lewis GJ, Arnold JC, Griffiths IW (2011) The dynamic behavior of squash balls. Am J Phys 79:291–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Collins F, Brabazon D, Moran K (2011) Viscoelastic impact characterisation of solid sports balls used in the Irish sport of hurling. Sports Eng 14:15–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Akay A, Hodgson TH (1978) Acoustic radiation from the elastic impact of a sphere with a slab. Appl Acoust 11:285–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dintwa E, Van Zeebroeck M, Ramon H, Tijskens E (2008) Finite element analysis of the dynamic collision of apple fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol 49:260–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hertzsch JM, Spahn F, Brilliantov V (1995) On low-velocity collisions of viscoelastic particles. J Phys II France 5:1725–1738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hertz H (1881) Ueber di Berührung fester elastischer Körper. J Reine Angew Math 92:156–171Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kuwabara G, Kono K (1987) Restitution coefficient in a collision between two spheres. Jpn J Appl Phys 26:1230–1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ismail KA, Stronge WJ (2008) Impact of viscoplastic bodies: dissipation and restitution. J Appl Mech 75:061011.1–061011.5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tabor D (1948) A simple theory of static and dynamic hardness. Proc R Soc Lond A 192:247–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jenckel E, Klein E (1952) Die Bestimmung von Relaxationszeiten aus der Rückprallelastizität. Z Naturf A 7:619–630Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tillett JPA (1954) A study of the impact of spheres on plates. Proc Phys Soc B 67:677–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hunter SC (1960) The Hertz problem for a rigid spherical indenter and a viscoelastic half-space. J Mech Phys Solids 8:219–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lifshitz JM, Kolsky H (1964) Some experiments on anelastic rebound. J Mech Phys Solids 12:35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Calvit HH (1967) Experiments on rebound of steel balls from blocks of polymers. J Mech Phys Solids 15:141–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Raphael T, Armeniades CD (1967) Correlation of rebound tester and torsion pendulum data on polymer samples. Polym Eng Sci 7:21–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Briggs LJ (1945) Methods for measuring the coefficient of restitution and the spin of a ball. Research Paper RP1624, National Bureau of StandardsGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Robbins RF, Weitzel DH (1969) An automated resilience apparatus for polymer studies from −196 to +180 °C. Rev Sci Inst 40:1014–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Drane PJ, Sherwood JA (2004) Characterization of the effect of temperature on baseball COR performance. In: Hubbard M et al (eds) The engineering of sports 5, vol 2. pp 59–65Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nathan AM, Smith LV, Faber WL, Russell DA (2011) Corked bats, juiced balls, and humidors: the physics and cheating in baseball. Am J Phys 79:575–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nagurka M, Huang S (2006) A mass-spring-damper model of a bouncing ball. Int J Eng Ed 22:393–401Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Safranski D, Gall K (2008) Effect of chemical structure and crosslinking density on the thermo-mechanical properties and toughness of (meth)acrylate shape memory polymer networks. Polymer 49:4446–4555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Weese J (1993) A regularization method for nonlinear ill-posed problems. Comput Phys Commun 77:429–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Williams ML, Landel RF, Ferry JD (1955) The temperature dependence of relaxation mechanisms in amorphous polymers and other glass-forming liquids. J Am Chem Soc 77:3701–3707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Matlab (2011) The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USAGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Aguiar CE, Laudares F (2003) Listening to the coefficient of restitution and the gravitational acceleration of a bouncing ball. Am J Phys 71:499–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Abaqus (2010) Dassault Systems Simulia Corp., Providence, RI, USAGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Simo JC (1987) On a fully three-dimensional finite-strain viscoelastic damage model: formulation and computational aspects. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 60:153–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Johnson KL (1985) Contact mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 351–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Carslaw HS, Jaeger HS (1959) Conduction of heat in solids, 2nd edn. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 233–234Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire PIMM Arts et Métiers ParisTech, CNRSParisFrance

Personalised recommendations