Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 48, Issue 11, pp 4050–4058 | Cite as

Deformation and fracture of a mudflat-cracked laser-fabricated oxide on Ti

  • S. K. Lawrence
  • D. P. Adams
  • D. F. Bahr
  • N. R. Moody
Article

Abstract

Concentrated heating of titanium by a focused laser beam in ambient atmosphere produces unique dielectric layers with characteristic colors dictated by film thickness and optical properties. A combination of microscopy and diffraction techniques employed to study the phase and microstructure of the oxide coatings showed that nanosecond-pulsed laser irradiation produces polycrystalline TiO films and underlying Ti6O interfacial layers. Mudflat cracking was prevalent in all coatings with most cracks extending through thickness to the metal substrate. Deformation and fracture behavior were probed by traditional nanoindentation methods with accompanying electron microscopy. These mixed titanium oxide coatings have moduli (~200 GPa) and hardnesses (~16 GPa) that are larger than the underlying metallic substrates. Fracture energies and residual stress have also been determined from pre-cracked films; fracture toughness and residual stress tend to decrease with decreasing laser fluence. Electrical contact resistance, measured with conductive nanoindentation, indicates a correlation between laser exposure, current–voltage behavior at constant load, and indentation response. Film conductance increases with decreasing laser fluence, likely due to the presence of defects, which act as a conduction path. Combining techniques provide a unique approach for defining electromechanical behavior and the resulting performance of the films in conditions that cause wear.

Keywords

Residual Stress Fracture Toughness Plastic Zone Fracture Load Crack Spacing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Basic Research Award # IACRO 10-4257I and by Sandia National Laboratories, a Lockheed Martin Company for the USDOE NNSA under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. The authors would like to thank Mark Rodriguez, Paul Kotula, Vitalie Stavila, and Ray Friddle for their work and helpful discussions on microscopy and XRD.

References

  1. 1.
    Wautelet M (1990) Appl Phys A 50:131. doi: 10.1007/BF00343408 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hongyu Z (2001) SIMTech Technical Report PT/01/005/AM. Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pérez del Pino A, Fernández-Pradas J, Serra P, Morenza J (2004) Surf Coat Technol 187:106. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gyorgy E, Perez del Pino A, Serra P, Morenza JL (2004) Appl Phys A 78:765. doi: 10.1007/s00339-002-2054-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wong MH, Cheng FT, Man HC (2007) Mater Lett 61:3391. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2006.11.081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pérez del Pino A, Serra P, Morenza J (2002) Thin Solid Films 415:201. doi: 10.1016/S0040-6090(02)00632-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yilbas BS, Shuja SZ, Hashmi MSJ (2003) J Mater Process Technol 136:12. doi: 0.1016/S0924-0136(02)00812-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Drory MD, Thouless MD, Evans AG (1988) Acta Metall 36:2019. doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(88)90303-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thouless MD (1990) Thin Solid Films 181:270. doi: 10.1016/0040-6090(89)90508-7 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thouless MD, Olsson E, Gupta A (1992) Acta Metall Mater 40:1287. doi: 10.1016/0956-7151(92)90429-I CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hu MS, Evans AG (1989) Acta Metall 37:917. doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(89)90018-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thouless M (1990) J Am Ceram Soc 73:2144. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb05290.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schuh CA (2006) Mater Today 9:32. doi: 10.1016/S1369-7021(06)71495-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) J Mater Res 7:1564. doi: 10.1557/JMR.1992.1564 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Whitehead A, Page T (1992) Thin Solid Films 220:277. doi: 10.1016/0040-6090(92)90585-Y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gerberich WW, Nelson JC, Lilleodden ET, Anderson P, Wyrobek JT (1996) Acta Mater 44:3585. doi: 10.1016/1359-6454(96)00010-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hainsworth S, McGurk M, Page T (1998) Surf Coat Technol 102:97. doi: 10.1016/S0257-8972(97)00683-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bahr DF, Kramer DE, Gerberich WW (1998) Acta Mater 46:3605. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00024-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rodriguez-Marek D, Bahr D, Pang M (2003) Metall Mater A 34:1291. doi: 10.1007/s11661-003-0240-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Boxley CJ, White HS, Gardner CE, Macpherson JV (2003) J Phys Chem 107:9677. doi: 10.1021/jp034874u Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pang M, Eakins DE, Norton MG, Bahr DF (2001) Corrosion 57:523. doi: 10.5006/1.3290378 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jiang HG, Rühle M, Lavernia EJ (2011) J Mater Res 14:549. doi: 10.1557/JMR.1999.0079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Scherrer P (1918) Nachr Ges Wiss Göttingen 26:98Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bartkowski S, Neumann M, Kurmaev E, Fedorenko V, Shamin S, Cherkashenko V, Nemnonov S, Winiarski A, Rubie D (1997) Phys Rev B 56:10656. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.10656 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kramer D, Huang H, Kriese M, Robach J (1998) Acta Mater 47:333. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00301-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tabor D (1951) The hardness of metals. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Morasch KR, Bahr DF (2007) Thin Solid Films 515:3298. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2006.01.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bahr DF, Woodcock CL, Pang M, Weaver KD, Moody NR (2003) Int J Fract 119(120):339. doi: 10.1023/A:1024979030155 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Li J, Forberg S, Hermansson L (1991) Biomaterials 12:438. doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(91)90015-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Latella BA, Gan BK, Li H (2007) Surf Coat Technol 201:6325. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.11.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Thouless MD (1995) Annu Rev Mater 25:69. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ms.25.080195.000441 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Khan RHU, Yerokhin AL, Matthews A (2008) Philos Mag 88:795. doi: 10.1080/14786430801968603 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lee C-C, Chen H-C, Jaing C-C (2006) Appl Opt 45:3091. doi: 10.1364/AO.50.001945 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Major B, Ebner R, Zieba P, Wolczynski W (1999) Appl Phys A 923:921. doi: 10.1007/s003399900273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kennedy MS, Moody NR, Adams DP, Clift M, Bahr DF (2008) Mater Sci Eng A 493:299. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2007.09.081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nowak R, Chrobak D, Nagao S (2009) Nat Nanotechnol 4:287. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2009.49 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Holleman AF, Wiberg E (2001) Inorganic chemistry. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kofstad P (1972) Nonstoichiometry, diffusion, and electrical conductivity in binary metal oxides. Wiley-Interscience, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lawrence SK, Stauffer DD, Major RC, Adams DP, Gerberich WW, Bahr DF, Moody NR (2012) MRS Proc 1424:73. doi: 10.1557/opl.2012.819 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Huisman L, Carlsson A, Gelatt CD Jr, Ehrenreich H (1980) Phys Rev B 22:991. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.22.991 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Valeeva A, Rempel A, Sprengel W, Schaefer H-E (2007) Phys Rev B 75:3. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.094107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. K. Lawrence
    • 1
    • 3
  • D. P. Adams
    • 2
  • D. F. Bahr
    • 1
  • N. R. Moody
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Mechanical and Materials EngineeringWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA
  2. 2.Sandia National LaboratoriesAlbuquerqueUSA
  3. 3.Sandia National LaboratoriesLivermoreUSA

Personalised recommendations