Viscoelasticity and compaction behaviour of the foam-like pomelo (Citrus maxima) peel
- 873 Downloads
The pomelo (Citrus maxima) is the largest and heaviest fruit of the genus Citrus and can acquire considerable potential energy as it ripens hanging up to 15 m height. Its thick foam-like structured peel presumably acts inter alia as a shock absorbing layer, protecting the fruit as it impacts on the ground upon being shed. Thereby the peel dissipates kinetic energy by being compacted. In order to elucidate the compaction mechanism of the highly heterogeneous pomelo peel, we conducted incremental stress relaxation tests. Two different models describing the stress relaxation curves, namely, the well-known Maxwell model and the Peleg model were compared and found to be suitable to describe the stress relaxation. As the Peleg model involves only two constants describing the relaxation curves it was the method of choice for interpreting the compaction of the peel samples. The inverse of k1 reflects the initial decay rate of the relaxation process and k2 is a measure of the samples’ solidity. The behaviour of these constants with increasing strain indicates the strong influence of the peel samples’ geometry and composition which is attributed to the fruit shape, a gradual changing density of the peel, which can be considered as a stacked array of foam layers differing in density, and the turgescence of the biological cells.
We want to thank the German Research Foundation (DFG) for funding this project within the priority program 1420 ‘Biomimetic Materials Research: Functionality by Hierarchical Structuring of Materials’.
- 7.Roth I (1977) In: Linsbauer K (ed) Handbuch der pflanzenanatomie spezieller teil, band X, teil 1—anatomy and morphology. Borntraeger, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- 11.Morton JF (1987) Fruits of warm climates. Creative Resource Systems, Inc., WintervilleGoogle Scholar
- 12.Seidel R, Bührig-Polaczek A, Fleck C, Speck T (2009) Impact resistance of hierarchically structured fruit walls and nut shells in view of biomimetic applications. In: Thibaut B (ed) Proceedings of the 6th plant biomechanics conference. ECOFOG, CayenneGoogle Scholar
- 13.Gyasi S, Fridley RB, Chen P (1981) Trans ASABE 24:0747Google Scholar
- 17.Dal Fabbro IM, Linares AW, Abraão RF (2001) Acta Hort 2001(562):319Google Scholar
- 23.Niklas KJ (1992) Plant biomechanics—an engineering approach to plant form and function. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- 27.R Development Core Team (2011) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- 29.Corradini MG, Peleg M (2008) In: Aguilera JM, Lillford PJ (eds) Food materials science—principles and practice. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 36.Gibson LJ, Ashby MF, Harley BA (2010) Cellular materials in nature and medicine. University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar