Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 48, Issue 6, pp 2454–2461 | Cite as

Finite element analysis of plastic deformation in variable lead axisymmetric forward spiral extrusion



A modified axisymmetric forward spiral extrusion (AFSE) has been proposed recently to enhance the strain accumulation during the process. The new technique is called variable lead axisymmetric forward spiral extrusion (VLAFSE) that features a variable lead along the extrusion direction. To assess the effect of design modification on plastic deformation, a comprehensive study has been performed here using a 3D transient finite element (FE) model. The FE results established the shear deformation as the dominant mode of deformation which has been confirmed experimentally. The variable lead die extends strain accumulation in the radial and longitudinal directions over the entire grooved section of the die and eliminates the rigid body rotation which occurs in the case of a constant lead die, AFSE. A comparison of forming loads for VLAFSE and AFSE proved the advantages of the former design in the reduction of the forming load which is more pronounced under higher frictional coefficients. This finding proves that the efficiency of VLAFSE is higher than that of AFSE. Besides, the significant amount of accumulated shear strain in VLAFSE along with non-axisymmetric distribution of friction creates a surface feature in the processed sample called zipper effect that has been investigated.


  1. 1.
    Zhu Y, Mathaudhu S, Göken M, Langdon T, Lowe T, Semiatin SL, Tsuji N, Zhao Y (2010) J Mater Sci 45 (17). doi:10.1007/s10853-010-4709-8
  2. 2.
    Yoon E, Yoo J, Yoon S, Kim Y, Baik S, Kim H (2010) J Mater Sci 45 (17). doi:10.1007/s10853-010-4469-5
  3. 3.
    Figueiredo R, Aguilar M, Cetlin P, Langdon T (2012) J Mater Sci 47 (22). doi:10.1007/s10853-012-6506-z
  4. 4.
    Latypov MI, Alexandrov IV, Beygelzimer YE, Lee S, Kim HS (2012) Comp Mat Sci 60:194–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yoon SC, Krishnaiah A, Chakkingal U, Kim HS (2008) Comp Mat Sci 43(4):641–645. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Talebanpour B, Ebrahimi R, Janghorban K (2009) Mater Sci Eng A 527(1–2):141–145. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2009.07.040 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mani B, Jahedi M, Paydar MH (2011) Mater Sci Eng A 528(12):4159–4165. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2011.02.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kocich R, Fiala J, Szurman I, Macháčková A, Mihola M (2011) J Mater Sci 46 (24). doi:10.1007/s10853-011-5768-1
  9. 9.
    Edalati K, Horita Z (2010) J Mater Sci 45 (17). doi:10.1007/s10853-010-4381-z
  10. 10.
    Ma X, Barnett MR, Kim YH (2004) Int J Mech Sci 46(3):449–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lapovok R, Pougis A, Lemiale V, Orlov D, Toth LS, Estrin Y (2010) J Mater Sci 45 (17). doi:10.1007/s10853-010-4403-x
  12. 12.
    Segal V (2006) Shear extrusion method. United States Patent US 7,096,705 B2Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Khoddam S, Farhoumand A, Hodgson PD (2011) Mater Sci Eng A 528(3):1023–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Farhoumand A, Khoddam S, Hodgson P (2012) Model Simulat Mater Sci Eng 20(8):085005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khoddam S, Farhoumand A, Hodgson PD (2012) Mater Sci Eng A 550:167–175. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2012.04.053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Abaqus/Explicit V (2009) Dassault Systèmes Inc., USAGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    UGS-NX SPS (2009) Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc., GermanyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia
  2. 2.Institute for Technology Research and InnovationDeakin UniversityGeelongAustralia

Personalised recommendations