Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 47, Issue 19, pp 6882–6890 | Cite as

Effects of added kaolinite on the strength and porosity of freeze-cast kaolinite–silica nanocomposites

Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

This paper examines the effects of kaolinite on the mechanical strength and porosity of freeze-cast kaolinite–silica composites. Measurement of the equibiaxial flexural strength shows that, after sintering at 1250 °C for 1 h, a ceramic containing 10 vol% kaolinite and 8 vol% silica has a strength that is 52 times greater than a ceramic containing only 18 vol% silica and 2.5 times greater than one containing only 18 vol% kaolinite, yet while also being 69 % porous (i.e., the porosity after sintering). It is proposed that this greater strength arises from three mechanisms. First, the kaolinite and silica particles bond together to form a connected network in which the much larger kaolinite platelets distribute the applied stress over a larger region of the sample (this increased strength is even seen in the freeze-cast green bodies before sintering). Second, X-ray diffraction measurements indicate that upon sintering at 1250 °C, new phases are formed when both silica and kaolinite are present, which we postulate contribute greatly to the strength of the composite. Third, the pore walls in samples containing both kaolinite and silica are much more continuous and unbroken than in samples containing only kaolinite.

Keywords

Kaolinite Sinter Temperature Silica Nanoparticles Pore Wall Maximum Strength 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support from the National Science Foundation under Grant No. CBET-0827246, and the American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund, Grant No. 47421-AC9. Assistance from the Nanoscale Characterization and Fabrication Laboratory at Virginia Tech is also acknowledged. The authors would also like to thank Mac McCord III for his assistances during the flexural strength tests.

References

  1. 1.
    Lemaitre J, Delmon B (1977) J Mater Sci 12:2056. doi: 10.1007/BF00561979 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bellotto M, Gualtieri A, Artioli G, Clark SM (1995) Phys Chem Miner 22:207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gualtieri A, Bellotto M, Artioli G, Clark SM (1995) Phys Chem Miner 22:215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bulens M, Delmon B (1977) Soc Chim Belg 86:405Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Viswabaskaran V, Gnanam FD, Balasubramanian M (2003) J Mater Process Technol 142:275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen CY, Lan GS, Tuan WH (2000) J Eur Ceram Soc 20:2519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu YF, Liu XQ, Tao SW, Meng GY, Sorensen OT (2002) Ceram Int 28:479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rezaie HR, Rainforth WM, Lee WE (1997) Br Ceram Trans 96:181Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li W, Lu K, Walz JY (2012) J Am Ceram Soc 95:883Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shih K, Leckie JO (2007) J Eur Ceram Soc 27:91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Panneerselvam M, Rao KJ (2003) Chem Mater 15:2247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yang KH, Wu JH, Hsi CS, Lu HY (2011) J Am Ceram Soc 94:938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baharvandi HR, Hadian AM (2009) J Mater Eng Perform 18:433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moritz T, Richter HJ (2007) J Eur Ceram Soc 27:4595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zuo KH, Zeng YP, Jiang DL (2008) Int J Appl Ceram Technol 5:198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhu XW, Jiang DL, Tan SH, Zhang ZQ (2001) J Am Ceram Soc 84:1654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Araki K, Halloran JW (2005) J Am Ceram Soc 88:1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lu AH, Schuth F (2006) Adv Mater 18:1793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yoshikawa H, Tamai N, Murase T, Myoui A (2009) J R Soc Interface 6:S341Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Deville S (2008) Adv Eng Mater 10:155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Caruso F, Caruso RA, Mohwald H (1998) Science 282:1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Deville S, Saiz E, Tomsia AP (2006) Biomaterials 27:5480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li W, Lu K, Walz JY (2010) J Am Ceram Soc 94:1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    ASTM Designation C1499–04 (2004) American society for testing and materials international, West Conshocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Arnold M, Boccaccini AR, Ondracek G (1996) J Mater Sci 31:1643. doi: 10.1007/BF00357876 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lobo-Guerrero S (2002) M.S. Thesis, University of PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sofie SW, Dogan F (2001) J Am Ceram Soc 84:1459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Case SW, Reifsnider KL (2003) In: Ritchie RO, Murakami Y (eds) Comprehensive structural integrity, vol 4. Elsevier Pergamon, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mandell F (1990) In: Reifsnider KL (ed) Composite materials series: fatigue of composites, vol 4. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yoon CK, Chen IW (1990) J Am Ceram Soc 73:1555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Becher PF, Tiegs TN (1987) J Am Ceram Soc 70:651CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA
  2. 2.Department of Chemical EngineeringVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations