Alkali silicate binders: effect of SiO2/Na2O ratio and alkali metal ion type on the structure and mechanical properties
The influence of SiO2:Na2O molar ratio and the nature of an alkali metal (Na vs. K) in commercial aqueous alkali silicate on the microstructure, textural properties, phase composition, and hydrolytic stability of an alkali silicate binder have been investigated using scanning electron microscopy, nitrogen adsorption/desorption technique, X-ray diffractometry, thermal analysis, and dissolution tests. It has been found that microstructure and textural properties of the alkali silicate binder depend both on silica to alkali molar ratio and type of alkali metal (Na vs. K). Sodium silicate binder obtained from commercial silicate solution with lower SiO2:Na2O molar ratio (2.2) exhibits a globular microstructure of silica xerogel with high content of micropores, whereas the binder formulated with SiO2:Na2O molar ratio 3.2 is characterized by more open cluster structure with lower content of micropores. It is observed that surface specific area estimated by Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller method and mesopore volume obtained by the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda method for sodium silicate binder are substantially higher than those for potassium silicate binder. The ultimate hydrolytic stability of the sodium silicate binder increases slightly with increase in the silica to alkali molar ratio within the studied range. Decreasing in SiO2:Na2O molar ratio and replacement of sodium silicate solution by potassium silicate solution in the corresponding filled composition lead to the improvement of mechanical properties and decrease in open porosity.
The authors are thankful to the professors Don Seo and Valery Putlyaev for useful discussions and to Dr. Anatoli Korkin for careful reading of the manuscript.
- 1.Robertson JC (1845) Mech Mag 42:441Google Scholar
- 5.Barabakdze V, Kozlov V, Mikulski V, Nikolov I (1995) Durability of building structures and constructions from composite materials., Russian Translations Series 109A.A. Balkema Publishers, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
- 8.Korneev V, Danilov V (1996) Liquid and soluble glass. Construction Publishing, St. Petersburg (in Russian)Google Scholar
- 9.Shi C (2004) US Patent No. 6749679 B2. US Patent Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 10.Beckwith WF (1996) US Patent No 3240736. US Patent Office, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
- 11.Self JM, Taylor SC (1977) Patent No 4011195. US Patent Office, PittsburgGoogle Scholar
- 12.Tertre Y (1968) US Patent No 3392127. US Patent Office, ParisGoogle Scholar
- 13.Iler R (1978) The chemistry of silica: solubility, polymerization, colloid and surface properties, and biochemistry. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 14.Brinker J, Scherer G (1990) Sol–gel science the physics and chemistry of sol–gel processing. Academic Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
- 16.Harris RK, O’Connor MJ, Curzon EH, Howart OW (1984) J Magn Res 57:115Google Scholar
- 20.British Standards Institution BS EN 12390-3 (2002) Testing of hardened concrete—compressive strength of test specimens. BSI, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 21.Christopher H, William DH (2002) Water transport in brick, stone, and concrete. Taylor and Francis, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 24.Hench LL (1998) Sol–gel silica: properties, processing, and technology transfer. Noyes Publications, New JerseyGoogle Scholar