Moulded polypropylene foams produced using chemical or physical blowing agents: structure–properties relationship
Polypropylene (PP) foams have become essential items due to their excellent properties. Nevertheless, obtaining net-shaped PP foams with medium relative densities is a complicated issue. In this article, two processes able to produce moulded PP foams in this density range are presented. One of them is based on a modification of the pressure quench foaming method and therefore uses a physical blowing agent (CO2). The second one is the improved compression moulding technique which uses a chemical blowing agent (azodicarbonamide). PP foams with relative densities in the range between 0.25 and 0.6 and cylindrical shape were prepared using these foaming techniques. A common PP grade (instead a highly branched one) was used to obtain the samples, showing, that by combining the appropriate foaming technique, the adequate moulds, suitable blowing agent and proper foaming parameters, net-shaped PP foams with excellent properties can be produced starting from a conventional PP grade. Samples were characterized by analyzing their cellular structure and their mechanical properties. Results have showed that depending on the chosen foaming route isotropic or anisotropic structures with cell sizes ranging from 40 to 350 μm and open cell content in the range between 0 and 65% can be obtained. Moreover, mechanical properties are highly influenced by the production route and chemical composition of the foams. For instance, the stiffer materials at relative densities higher than 0.4 are the ones produced using the chemical blowing agent while at relative densities lower than 0.4 are the ones produced using the physical blowing agent.
KeywordsFoam Injection Moulding Expansion Ratio Anisotropy Ratio Cell Size Distribution
Financial assistance from Spanish Ministry of Science and Education and Feder Program (MAT 2009-14001 CO2-01) as well as Innocash Project (INC-0193) and ESA Project AO-99-075 “Advanced foams unless Microgravity” are gratefully acknowledged.
- 2.Eaves D (2004) Handbook of polymeric foams. Rapra Technology, ShawburyGoogle Scholar
- 3.Klempner D, Sendijarevic V (2004) Handbook of polymeric foams and foam technology, 2nd edn. Hanser Publishers, MunichGoogle Scholar
- 10.Zheng WG, Lee YH, Park CB (2010) J Appl Polym Sci 117:2972Google Scholar
- 16.Osswald TA, Turn LS, Gramman PJ (2002) Injection moulding handbook. Hanser Publishers, MunichGoogle Scholar
- 20.Okamoto KT (2003) Microcellular processing. Hanser Publishers, MunichGoogle Scholar
- 21.Rodríguez-Pérez MA, Lobos J, Pérez-Muñoz CA, de Saja JA (2008) Cell Polym 27:327Google Scholar
- 23.Rodríguez-Pérez MA, Simoes RD, Roman-Lorza S, Alvarez-Lainez M, Montoya-Mesa C, Constantino CJL, de Saja JA (2011) Polym Eng Sci. doi: 10.1002/pen.22046
- 24.Pinto J, Rodríguez-Pérez MA, de Saja JA (2009) In: XI Reunión del Grupo Especializado de Polímeros (GEP), 10–14 September 2009, Valladolid, SpainGoogle Scholar
- 25.Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1997) Cellular solids: structure and properties. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar