Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 46, Issue 20, pp 6664–6672 | Cite as

Effect of moisture absorption on the micromechanical behavior of carbon fiber/epoxy matrix composites

  • J. I. Cauich-Cupul
  • E. Pérez-Pacheco
  • A. Valadez-González
  • P. J. Herrera-Franco
Article

Abstract

Carbon fiber/epoxy material in the form of a single fiber unidirectional composite was subjected to controlled humidity environments. Moisture uptake in polymer composites has significant effects on the mechanical properties of the matrix as well as on the final performance of the composite material. Diminishing of the mechanical properties of the matrix is attributed to a decrease of its glass transition temperature (T g). The quality of the fiber–matrix interphase was assessed using the single fiber fragmentation test and the fiber-fragment length, considered as an indicator of interfacial quality. In order to measure the fiber fragment lengths and indentify failure mechanism at the interface optical observation and acoustic emission technique were used. The speed of propagation of an acoustic wave in the material was also determined. A comparison is made of interfacial shear strength values determined by acoustic emission and optical techniques. Excellent agreement between the two techniques was obtained. By means of a micromechanical model, it was possible to determine from the fragmentation lengths a measure of the interfacial shear strength between the fiber and the matrix. The role of moisture uptake swelling of the matrix on the residual stresses is considered to be important when considering the effect deterioration of interfacial shear properties. Both the contribution of the radial stresses and the mechanical component of fiber–matrix adhesion are seen to decrease rapidly for higher moisture contents in the matrix and/or interface.

Keywords

Acoustic Emission Acoustic Signal Interfacial Shear Moisture Absorption Silane Coupling Agent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express the financial support from Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología given through grant # 31272-U and for the scholarships granted to Mrs. Emilio Pérez Pacheco and Mr. Javier I. Cauich Cupul.

References

  1. 1.
    Xiao GZ, Shanahan MER (1997) J Polym Sci B 3:2659Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pomies F, Carlsson LA (1994) J. Compos Mater 28:22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Adams DF (1986) A micromechanies analysis of the influence of the interface on the performance of polymer matrix composites. In: Proceedings of the American Society for composites, lst technical conference, 7–9 Oct. Technomic publishing, Dayton, p 207Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chateauminois A, Chabert B, Soulier JP, Vincent L (1995) Polym Comp 16:288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Soles CL, Chang FT, Gidley DW, Yee AF (2000) J Polym Sci B 38:776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Drzal LT, Rich MJ, Koenig MF (1985) Adhesion 18:49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Spragg CJ, Drzal LT (1996) Fiber, matrix and interface properties. ASTM STP no 1290. American Society for Testing and Materials, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Netravali AN, Li ZF, Sachse WH, Wu HF (1990) In: Buckley JD (ed) Third conference on advanced engineering fibers and textile structure for composites. NASA conference publication 3082, Hampton, VAGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Park JM, Chong EM, Dong JY, Lee JH (1998) Polym Comp 19:747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nielsen LE, Landel RF (1994) Mechanical properties of polymers and composites. CRC Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    ASTM (1985) Maintaining constant relative humidity by means of aqueous solutions. Book of ASTM standards, part 6. ASTM Designation E 104-85. American Society for Testing Materials, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mijovic J, Lin KF (1985) J Appl Polym Sci 30:2527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vanlandingham MR, Eduljee RF, Gillespie JW (1999) J Appl Polym Sci 71:787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xiao GZ, Shanahan MER (1998) J Appl Polym Sci 69:363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kolsky H (1963) Stress waves in solids. Dover Publications Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lu MG, Shim MJ, Kim SW (2001) J Appl Polym Sci 8:2253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nogueira P, Ramirez C, Torres A, Abad MJ, Cano J, Lopez J, Lopez-Bueno I, Barral L (2001) J Appl Polym Sci 80:71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rao V, Drzal LT (1991) Polym Compos 12:48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Adamson MJ (1980) J Mater Sci 15:1736. doi: 10.1007/BF00550593 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jackson ML, Love BJ, Hebner SR (1999) J Mater Sci Mater Electron 10:71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Xu ZR, Ashbee KHG (1994) J Mater Sci 29:394. doi: 10.1364/AO.29.000394 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    El-saad L, Darby MI, Yates B (1989) J Mater Sci 24:1653. doi: 10.1007/BF01105687 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ebrahimzadeh PR, Mcqueen DH (1998) J Mater Sci 33:1201. doi: 10.1023/A:1004373525437 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Whitney JM, Drzal LT (1987) In: Johnston NJ (ed) ASTM STP 937 ASTM Committee D-30 on high modulus fibers and their composites, Philadelphia, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. I. Cauich-Cupul
    • 1
  • E. Pérez-Pacheco
    • 2
  • A. Valadez-González
    • 1
  • P. J. Herrera-Franco
    • 1
  1. 1.Centro de Investigación Científica de YucatánUnidad de MaterialesMéridaMéxico
  2. 2.Instituto Tecnológico de MéridaMéridaMéxico

Personalised recommendations