Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 46, Issue 16, pp 5534–5540 | Cite as

The influence of adhesive on the Al alloy in laser weld bonding Mg–Al process

  • H. Y. Wang
  • L. M. LiuEmail author
  • Z. Y. Jia


Laser weld bonding is a new welding technology, being used to join Mg–Al alloys. The penetration depth of LWB Mg–Al joint was larger than that in simply laser welding joint in same welding parameters. The temperature at the edge of the Al fusion zone in LWB Mg–Al joint was higher than that in laser welding joint, which was measured through the thermal couples. The laser-introduced plasma in LWB Mg–Al process is observed by the high-speed camera, which is different from that in laser welding process. The surface temperature and state of the Al alloy were changed because of the addition of the adhesive, thus the laser absorptive of Al alloy was increased in LWB process, comparing with that in laser welding process; and the decomposition of the adhesive would make a depression in the Al fusion zone, which would be beneficial to the formation of keyhole welding in LWB Mg–Al joint.


Welding Fusion Zone Laser Welding Friction Stir Welding Hybrid Welding 



The authors really appreciate the supports from National Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholar (51025520) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (DUT10ZD108).


  1. 1.
    Zhao H, White DR, DebRoy T (1999) Int Mater Rev 44:238–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hekmat-Ardakan A, Ajersch F, Chen X-G (2011) J Mater Sci 46:2370. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Braun R (2006) Mater Sci Eng A 426:250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Song G, Luo Z (2011) Opt Laser Eng 49:82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hakamada M, Shimizu K, Yamashita T, Watazu A, Saito N et al (2010) J Mater Sci 45:719. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Qi X, Gang S (2010) Mater Des 31:605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vaidya WV, Horstmann M, Ventzke V, Petrovski B, Koçak M et al (2010) J Mater Sci 45:6242. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Somasekharan AC, Murr LE (2004) Mater Charact 52:49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yan J, Xu Z (2005) Scr Mater 53:585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jiang JB, Zhang ZD (2008) J Alloys Compd 466:368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dietrich D, Nickel D, Krause M, Lampke T, Coleman MP et al (2011) J Mater Sci 46:357. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sato YS, Park SHC, Michiuchi M, Kokawa H (2004) Scr Mater 50:1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhao LM, Zhang ZD (2008) Scr Mater 58:283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen YC, Nakata K (2008) Scr Mater 58:433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu L-M, Wang H-Y, Zhang Z-D (2007) Scr Mater 56:473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu L, Wang H, Song G, Ye J (2007) J Mater Sci 42:565. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Messler RW (2002) Ind Robot 29:138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mackwood AP, Craferb RC (2005) Opt Laser Technol 37:99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Anisimov SI, Khokhlov VA (1996) Instabilities in laser–matter interaction. CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Landau LD, Lifshitz EM (1980) Statistical physics, part I. Pergamon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Semak V, Matsunawa A (1997) J Phys D Appl Phys 30:2541CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Key Laboratory of Liaoning Advanced Welding and Joining TechnologyDalian University of TechnologyDalianChina

Personalised recommendations