Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 46, Issue 16, pp 5487–5494 | Cite as

In situ analysis of crack propagation in polymer foams

  • Elio E. SaenzEmail author
  • Leif. A. Carlsson
  • Anette M. Karlsson
Article

Abstract

This article presents an experimental study on the microscopic mechanisms associated with crack propagation in closed cell polymer foams. A brittle, slightly cross-linked polyvinyl chloride (PVC) foam of density 60 kg/m3 and a ductile thermoplastic polyether sulfone (PES) foam of density 90 kg/m3 were examined. The PVC and PES foams have similar cell size (≈0.7 mm) but the cell edges of the PES foam were much thicker than those in the PVC foam. Overall, it was observed that the elements of both foams fractured in an extensional mode. Crack propagation in the PVC foam was inter-cellular, where agglomerates of very small cells formed a region of weakness. Damaged cell walls were observed on both sides of the crack plane. For the PES foam, craze-like deformation bands were observed in the highly stretched region ahead of the blunted crack tip. Further ahead of the crack tip, highly stretched cells were observed. Fracture occurred predominantly through the center of the cells in the PES foam.

Keywords

Foam Fracture Process Zone Cell Edge Polymer Foam Open Cell Foam 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Support for this research was provided by the National Science Foundation (#630105-6) under a sub-contract from University of Delaware. Also, special thanks goes to Chris Kilbourn and James Jones of DIAB Desoto, Texas who provided foam materials free of charge.

References

  1. 1.
    Maiti S, Ashby MF, Gibson LJ (1984) Scr Metall 18:213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Choi S, Sankar B (2005) Int J Solids Struct 42:1797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zenkert D, Bäcklund J (1989) Compos Sci Technol 34(3):225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Viana GM, Carlsson LA (2002) J Sandw Struct Mater 4(2):99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Motz C, Pippan R (2002) Acta Mater 50(8):2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Saenz E, Carlsson LA, Karlsson AM (2011) J Mater Sci 46(9):3207. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-5205-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kinloch AJ, Young RJ (1985) Fracture behavior polymers. Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    ASTM D1622-03 Standard test method for apparent density of rigid cellular plasticsGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    ASTM D3576-04 Standard test method for cell size of rigid cellular plasticsGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1988) Cellular solids structure and properties, 1st edn. Pergamon Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ultrason 1010 PES: Product Information (2004) BASF. https://doi.org/worldaccount.basf.com/wa/EU/Catalog/ePlastics/info/BASF/product/ultrason_e_1010. Accessed August 2009
  12. 12.
    Torlon Polyamide-imide Design Guide (2009) Solvay Advanced Polymers. https://doi.org/www.solvayadvancedpolymers.com/static/wma/pdf/9/9/7/Torlon_Design_Guide.pdf. Accessed August 2009
  13. 13.
    Sugimura Y, Meyer J, He M, Bart-Smith H, Grenstedt J, Evans AG (1997) Acta Mater 45(12):5245CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elio E. Saenz
    • 1
    Email author
  • Leif. A. Carlsson
    • 1
  • Anette M. Karlsson
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Ocean and Mechanical EngineeringFlorida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations