Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 46, Issue 14, pp 4780–4786 | Cite as

Surface modification of Scots pine: the effect of process parameters on the through thickness density profile

  • Lauri RautkariEmail author
  • Kristiina Laine
  • Nick Laflin
  • Mark Hughes
Article

Abstract

This study evaluated the significance of different process parameters (press temperature, closing time, holding time, moisture content and compression ratio) on solid wood surface densification and its effect on the density profile generated in Scots pine sapwood. Changes in the microstructure of the wood were also evaluated microscopically. The results showed that with a shorter closing time, densification occurred closer to the sample surface than with an extended closing time. At a compression temperature of 150 °C, the vertical density profile exhibited a sharp peak in density that was close to the wood surface. A higher temperature of 200 °C resulted in a slightly broader density peak that was less intense and further from the surface. A holding time of 10 min resulted in the wood compressing to a slightly greater extent than when using a holding time of 1 min. Higher moisture content led to more extensive deformation. The results indicate that surface modification by densification is a viable method of enhancing wood properties.

Keywords

Closing Time Compression Ratio Density Profile High Moisture Content Wood Surface 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The study was partly funded by the Finnish Cultural Foundation and the Vocational Training Foundation of Woodworking Men. This study was partly carried out in BC, Bangor University (UK) and Aalto University (Finland). Authors acknowledge all support what have been given those institutions.

References

  1. 1.
    Kellog RM, Wangaard FF (1969) Wood Fiber Sci 1:180Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wilfong JG (1966) For Prod J 16:55Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hillis WE, Rozsa AN (1978) Holzforschung 32:68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Salmén L (1990) In: Proceedings of materials research society symposiumGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Uhmeir A, Morooka T, Norimoto M (1998) Holzforschung 52:77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Navi P, Girardet F (2000) Holzforschung 54:287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Navi P, Heger F (2004) MRS Bull 29:332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kutnar A, Kamke FA, Sernek M (2008) Holz Roh Werkst 66:439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kutnar A, Kamke FA, Sernek M (2009) Wood Sci Technol 43:57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fukuta S, Asada F, Yasutoshi S (2008) For Prod J 58:82Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pizzi A, Leban J-M, Zanetti M, Pichelin F, Wieland S, Properzi M (2005) Holz Roh Werkst 63:251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rautkari L, Properzi M, Pichelin F, Hughes M (2008) In: Proceedings of 10th world conference on timber engineeringGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rautkari L, Properzi M, Pichelin F, Hughes M (2009) Wood Sci Technol 43:291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rautkari L, Properzi M, Pichelin F, Hughes M (2010) Wood Sci Technol 44:679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lamason C, Gong M (2007) For Prod J 57:64Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tarkow H, Seborg R (1968) For Prod J 18:104Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wong ED, Zhang M, Wang Q, Kawai S (1998) J Wood Sci 44:287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang S, Winistorfer PM, Young TM, Helton C (2001) Holz Roh Werkst 59:19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Camm A, Quilter K (2001) In: Proceedings of the fifth panel products symposium. Llandudno, Wales, UKGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cai Z, Muehl JH, Winandy JE (2006) For Prod J 56:20Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang JY, Cooper PA (2005) Holz Roh Werkst 63:397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gong M, Lamason C, Li L (2010) J Mater Process Technol 210:293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Welzbacher CR, Wehsener J, Rapp AO, Haller P (2008) Holz Roh Werkst 66:39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tabarsa T, Chui YH (1997) For Prod J 47:71Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Inoue M, Norimoto M, Otsuka Y, Yamada T (1991) Mokuzai Gakkaishi 37:227Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lauri Rautkari
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kristiina Laine
    • 1
  • Nick Laflin
    • 2
  • Mark Hughes
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forest Products TechnologyAalto University, School of Chemical TechnologyAalto, EspooFinland
  2. 2.BC, Bangor UniversityBangorUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations