Effect of filler dispersion degree on the Joule heating stimulated recovery behaviour of nanocomposites
- 273 Downloads
- 17 Citations
Abstract
Composites based on highly branched ethylene-1-octene copolymer (EOC) and carbon black (CB) with different dispersion degree of CB were prepared. The method of the online measured electrical conductance/resistance was used to monitor the change of the electrical conductance/resistance of the composites during the preparation processes, i.e. mixing and cross-linking. It was found that the kinetics of thermally stimulated shape-memory recovery of CB filled EOC is strongly influenced by the filler dispersion degree, which actually affects the heat transfer in the composites. Using a special arrangement of experiments the Joule heating stimulated shape-memory behaviour was quantified. CB dispersion degree and related electrical resistivity determine the extent of the Joule heating stimulated shape-memory behaviour. Composite collected at the maximum in the online measured conductance–time characteristics showed the best shape-memory effect owing to the highest electrical conductivity in the solid state. The CB filled EOC showed a negative thermal coefficient of resistivity (NTC) effect, which accelerates the temperature increase and shape-memory recovery of the composites when applying a voltage.
Keywords
Carbon Black Joule Heating EPDM Dispersion Degree Carbon Black SurfaceReferences
- 1.Lendlein A, Langer R (2002) Science 296:1673CrossRefADSPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.Lendlein A, Kelch S (2002) Angew Chem Int Ed 41:2034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Behl M, Lendlein A (2007) Mater Today 10:20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Gunes IS, Cao F, Jana SC (2008) Polymer 49:2223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Gunes IS, Jana SC (2008) J Nanosci Nanotechnol 8:1616CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Lan X, Huang WM, Leng JS, Liu N, Phee LSJ, Yuan Q (2008) Gummi Fasern Kunstst 61:784Google Scholar
- 7.Leng J, Liu HL, Liu Y, Du S (2007) Appl Phys Lett 91:144105-1CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 8.Cho JW, Kim JW, Jung YC, Goo NS (2005) Macromol Rapid Commun 26:412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Paik IH, Goo NS, Jung YC, Cho JW (2006) Smart Mater Struct 15:1476CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 10.Jiang X, Bin Y, Matsuo M (2005) Polymer 46:7418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Ni QQ, Zhang Ch, Fu Y, Dai G, Kimura T (2007) Compos Struct 81:176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Meng Q, Hu J, Zhu Y (2007) J Appl Polym Sci 106:837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Heinrich G, Klüppel M, Vilgis TA (2002) Curr Opinion Solid State Mater Sci 6:195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Takino H, Iwama S, Yamada Y (1997) Rubber Chem Technol 70:15Google Scholar
- 15.Hess WM, Chirico VE (1997) Rubber Chem Technol 50:301Google Scholar
- 16.Hess WM, Scott CE, Callan JE (1967) Rubber Chem Technol 40:371Google Scholar
- 17.Schuster RH, Meier J, Klüppel M (2000) Kautsch Gummi Kunstst 53:663Google Scholar
- 18.Le HH, Tiwari M, Ilisch S, Radusch H-J (2006) Plast Rubber Compos Macromol Eng 35:410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Le HH, Ilisch S, Jakob B, Radusch HJ (2004) Rubber Chem Technol 77:147Google Scholar
- 20.Le HH, Ilisch S, Steinberger H, Radusch H-J (2008) Plast Rubber Compos Macromol Eng 37:367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Ali Z, Le HH, Ilisch S, Busse K, Radusch H-J (2009) J Appl Polym Sci 113:667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Le HH, Ilisch S, Radusch H-J (2009) Polymer 50:2294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Kolesov IS, Kratz K, Lendlein A, Radusch H-J (2009) Polymer 50:5490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Kolesov IS, Radusch H-J (2008) eXPRESS Polym Lett 2:461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Le HH, Ilisch S, Radusch H-J (2010) Electrically stimulatable shape-memory materials based on carbon black filled ethylene-octene copolymer (EOC) and their blends. 10th European symposium on polymer blends, March 7–10, 2010. Dresden, Germany, Book of abstracts, p. 94Google Scholar
- 26.Le HH, Tiwari M, Ilisch S, Radusch H-J (2005) Kautsch Gummi Kunstst 58:575Google Scholar
- 27.Stumpe NA, Railsback HE (1964) Rubber World 151:41Google Scholar
- 28.Zhang J, Feng S (2003) J Appl Polym Sci 89:3471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Kantor Y, Webman I (1984) Phys Rev Lett 52:1891CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 30.Klüppel M (2003) Adv Polym Sci 164:1Google Scholar
- 31.Kohjiya S, Katoh A, Suda T, Shimanuki J, Ikeda Y (2006) Polymer 47:3298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Kaufman S, Slichter WP, Davis DD (1971) J Polym Sci A 9:829Google Scholar
- 33.Vieweg S, Unger R, Hempel E, Donth EJ (1998) Non-Cryst Solids 235:470CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 34.Arrighi V, Higgins JS, Burgess AN, Floudas G (1998) Polymer 39:6369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Litvinov VM, Spiess HW (1991) Makromol Chem 192:3005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Srinivasan N, Bökamp K, Vennemann N (2005) Kautsch Gummi Kunstst 58:650Google Scholar
- 37.Le HH, Heidenreich D, Kolesov IS, Ilisch S, Radusch H-J (2009) J Appl Polym Sci. doi: 30769
- 38.Tang H, Piao JH, Yang HL (1993) J Appl Polym Sci 48:1795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Klason C, Kubat J (1975) J Appl Polym Sci 19:831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Narkis M, Ram A, Flashner F (1978) Polym Eng Sci 18:649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Voet A (1981) Rubber Chem Technol 54:42Google Scholar
- 42.Das NC, Chaki TK, Khastgir D (2003) J Appl Polym Sci 90:2073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.Zhang J, Feng S (2003) J Appl Polym Sci 90:3889CrossRefGoogle Scholar