Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 45, Issue 12, pp 3228–3241 | Cite as

Statistical quantification of the microstructural homogeneity of size and orientation distributions

Article

Abstract

Methodologies to quantify the microstructural homogeneity, or uniformity, have been developed based on the proposed statistical homogeneity theory. Two kinds of homogeneities are considered, for the size and orientation distributions, respectively. In the case of size distribution, the homogeneity is quantified using two parameters, H0.1 and H0.2, which are defined as the probabilities falling into the ranges of μ ± 0.1μ and μ ± 0.2μ, respectively, where μ is the mean size. Whereas in the case of orientation distribution, three parameters are used to quantify the homogeneity: HR, the mean resultant length that is a simple measure of the angular data concentration, and H0.1 and H0.2, which are the probabilities in particular angular ranges of the circular or spherical data. These homogeneity quantities are formularized using the common statistical models, and typical examples are demonstrated.

List of symbols

a, b, c

Grain axes

COV or σ/μ

Coefficient of variation

COV(dmean)

Coefficient of variation of the mean near-neighbor distance

\( \left( {\overline{C} ,\,\overline{S} } \right) \)

Coordinates of mean resultant vector

D, D0.1 and D0.2

Dispersion quantities

f

Probability density function

Gv

Grain homogeneity parameter

H, H0.1 and H0.2

Homogeneity quantities

HR

Directional homogeneity quantity

HPq

Dimensionless homogeneity parameter

K

Curvature

L

Length

N

Total number, or measurement number

p

Fitting parameter

\( \overline{R} \)

Mean resultant length

r

Correlation coefficient

s

Sample standard deviation

Usize

Size uniformity

Usp

Spatial uniformity

\( \overline{V} \)

Mean volume

\( \overline{x} \)

Sample mean

(x, y)

Mass center

\( (x_{\text{G}} ,y_{\text{G}} ) \)

Mass gravity center

\( (x_{\text{S}} ,y_{\text{S}} ) \)

Microstructural center

α and β

Fitting parameters

ϕ

Longitude

κ

Fitting parameter

μ

Population mean

θ

Angle, or colatitude

ρ

Population mean resultant length

σ

Population standard deviation

\( \sigma_{\text{ga}} \)

Standard deviation of the grain areas

References

  1. 1.
    Underwood EE (1970) Quantitative stereology. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Takayama Y, Tozawa T, Kato H, Akaneya Y, Chang IS (1996) J Japn Inst Met 60:44 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Heijman MJGW, Benes NE, ten Elshof JE, Verweij H (2002) Mater Res Bull 37:141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hendriks MGHM, Heijman MJGW, van Zyl WE, ten Elshof JE, Verweij H (2002) J Am Ceram Soc 85:2097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sidor Y, Dzubinsky M, Kovac F (2003) Mater Charact 51:109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sidor Y, Dzubinsky M, Kovac F (2005) J Mater Sci 40:6257. doi:10.1007/s10853-005-3145-7 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gadala-Maria F, Parsi F (1993) Polym Compos 14:126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fu SY, Lauke B (1996) Compos Sci Technol 56:1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim HS (2004) Fiber Polym 5:177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reihanian M, Ebrahimi R, Moshksar MM, Terada D, Tsuji N (2008) Mater Charact 59:1312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Luo ZP (2006) Acta Mater 54:47CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Suzuki S, Takeda K (2000) J Wood Sci 46:289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rigdahl M, Andersson H, Westerlind B, Hollmark H (1983) Fibre Sci Technol 19:127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schulgasser K (1985) J Mater Sci 20:859. doi:10.1007/BF00585727 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Russ JC (1991) Mater Charact 27:185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carpenter DT, Rickman JM, Barmak K (1998) J Appl Phys 84:5843CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Roebuck B (2000) Mater Sci Technol 16:1167Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Takahashi J, Suito H (2001) Acta Mater 49:711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chen SP, Hanlon DN, Van der Zwaag S, Pei YT, Dehosson JTM (2002) J Mater Sci 37:989. doi:10.1023/A:1014356116058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Susan D (2005) Metall Mater Trans A 36:2481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Duarte MT, Liu HY, Kou SQ, Lindqvist PA, Miskovsky K (2005) J Mater Eng Perform 14:104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhilyaev AP, Swaminathan S, Gimazov AA, McNelley TR, Langdon TG (2008) J Mater Sci 43:7451. doi:10.1007/s10853-008-2714-y CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Luo ZP, Koo JH (2007) J Microsc 225:118CrossRefPubMedMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dougherty ER (1990) Probability and statistics for the engineering, computing, and physical sciences. Prentic-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New JerseyMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schwarz H, Exner HE (1983) J Microsc 129:155Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yang N, Boselli J, Sinclair I (2001) J Microsc 201:189CrossRefPubMedMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ganguly P, Poole WJ (2002) Mater Sci Eng A332:301Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Luo ZP, Koo JH (2008) Mater Lett 62:3493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Luo ZP, Koo JH (2008) Polymer 49:1841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Morawiec A (2004) Orientations and rotations: computations in crystallographic textures. Springer, BerlinMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fisher NI (1993) Statistical analysis of circular data. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mardia KV, Jupp PE (2000) Directional statistics. Wiley, West Sussex, EnglandMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jammalamadaka SR, SenGupta A (2001) Topics in circular statistics. World Scientific Publishing Co., Pte. Ltd., SingaporeMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Watson GS (1983) Statistics on spheres. Wiley, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fisher NI, Lewis T, Embleton BJJ (1987) Statistical analysis of spherical data. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Borradaile G (2003) Statistics of earth science data: their distribution in time, space, and orientation. Springer, BerlinMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nelson PR, Coffin M, Copeland KAF (2003) Introductory statistics for engineering experimentation. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Abramoff MD, Magelhaes PJ, Ram SJ (2004) Biophoton Int 11:36Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Al-Khedher MA, Pezeshki C, McHale JL, Knorr FJ (2007) Nanotechnology 18:355703 (11pp)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chen SH, Chen CC, Luo ZP, Chao CG (2009) Mater Lett 63:1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Potter PE, Pettijohn FJ (1977) Paleocurrents and basin analysis. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Microscopy and Imaging CenterTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations