Relation between structure and mechanical properties (elastoplastic and fracture behavior) of hybrid organic–inorganic coating
- 162 Downloads
- 11 Citations
Abstract
The mechanical properties of various inorganic organic films were studied and compared in order to investigate the relation between structural modifications and the mechanical behavior. Films were prepared by a sol–gel process and spin-coated on silicon substrate. The organic–inorganic hybrid is composed of a mixture of colloidal silica and organosiloxane precursors. The functionality of the organosiloxane and the nature of its organic part have been modified to obtain a structural change. Mechanical properties were studied using nanoindentation. Analysis of the strength evolution as a function of depth of indentation shows the layer hardness and elastic modulus. Moreover, coating and interface toughness and residual stresses were determined by a time resolved study of energy dissipation during indentation. The structural changes were determined using liquid and solid 29Si NMR spectroscopy. Quantity of partially and fully condensed species in the deposited sol and final solid are discussed in relation to the mechanical properties.
Keywords
Residual Stress Indentation Depth Colloidal Silica MTES Siloxane BondReferences
- 1.Frings S, Meinema HA, Van Nostrum CF, Vander-Linde R (1998) Prog Org Coat 33:126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Etienne P, Phalippou J, Sempere R (1998) J Mater Sci 33:3999. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004609115560 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Kagan CR, Mitzi DB, Dimitrakopoulos CD (1999) Science 286:945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Lee TW, Park O, Yoon J, Kim JJ (2001) Adv Mater 3:211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Huynh WU, Dittmer JJ, Alivisatos AP (2002) Science 295:2425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Yoshida M, Prasad PN (1996) Chem Mater 8:235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Biteau J, Chaput F, Lahlil K, Boilot JP, Tsivgoulis GM, Lehn JM, Darracq B, Marois C, Levy Y (1998) Chem Mater 10:1945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Etienne-Calas S, Duri A, Etienne P (2004) J Non-Cryst Solids 344:60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Malzbender J, De With G (2000) J Non-Cryst Solids 265:51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Ferchichi AK, Etienne-Calas S, Etienne P (2008) J Non-Cryst Solids 354:712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Glaser RH, Wilkes GL (1989) J Non-Cryst Solids 11:373Google Scholar
- 12.Brunet F (1998) J Non-Cryst Solids 231:58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Loubet J, Georges JM, Marchesini O, Meille G (1984) J Tribol 106:43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) J Mater Res 7:1564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Broek D (1997) Elementary engineering fracture and mechanics. Kluwer Academic, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- 16.Marshall DB, Lawn BR (1977) J Am Ceram Soc 60:86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Rosenfeld LG, Ritter JE, Lardner TJ, Lin MR (1990) J Appl Phys 67:3291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Hutchinson JW, Suo Z (1992) Adv Appl Mech 92:63Google Scholar
- 19.Lawn BR (1993) Fracture of brittle solids. Cambridge University Press, London, p 378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Li X, Diao D, Bhushan B (1997) Acta Mater 45:4453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Brinker CJ (1988) J Non-Cryst Solids 100:31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Bissuel F (1996) Ph.D. thesis, University of Montpellier 2Google Scholar
- 23.Sugahara Y, Okada S, Kuroda K, Kato C (1992) J Non-Cryst Solids 13:925Google Scholar
- 24.Lux P, Brunet F, Virlet J, Cabane B (1996) Magn Reson Chem 34:100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.De Monredon S (2004) Ph.D. thesis, University Paris VIGoogle Scholar
- 26.Osterholz FD, Pohl ER (1992) Silanes and other coupling agents. Utrecht, p 119Google Scholar