Phase field modeling of grain growth: effect of boundary thickness, triple junctions, misorientation, and anisotropy
- 626 Downloads
- 31 Citations
Abstract
Phase-field models based on multiple order parameters are used extensively to study grain growth in polycrystalline materials. However, if simulations are to be carried out using experimentally obtained microstructures as the initial condition, and the resultant microstructures are to be carefully compared with those obtained from experiments, then the parameters used in the numerical simulations need to be benchmarked with analytical solutions. Furthermore, the models themselves need to be modified to incorporate the dependence of grain boundary energy on misorientation across the boundary as well as the anisotropy in the boundary energy for any given misorientation that stems from the planes of different grains that make up the boundary. In this article, we address both these issues and present some preliminary results from our 2D and 3D simulations.
Keywords
Grain Boundary Phase Field Triple Junction Boundary Energy Shrinkage RateNotes
Acknowledgements
We thank Yunzhi Wang and Dave Rowenhorst for useful discussions, and the Office of Naval Research (ONR-CNV0044048) for financial support.
References
- 1.Gottstein G, Shvindlerman LS (1999) Grain boundary migration in metals: thermodynamics, kinetics, application. CRC Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 2.Sutton AP, Balluffi RW (1997) Interfaces in crystalline materials. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 3.Humphreys FJ, Hatherly M (2004) Recrystallization and related annealing phenomena, 2nd edn. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 4.Fionova LK, Artemyev AV (1993) Grain boundaries in metals and semiconductors. de physique edition, Les Ulis CedexGoogle Scholar
- 5.Kang S-KL (2005) Sintering: densification, grain growth and microstructure. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 6.Moelans N, Blanpain B, Wollants P (2008) Phys Rev B 78(024113):1Google Scholar
- 7.von Neumann J (1952) Metal interfaces. American Society of Metals, Cleveland, p 65. A written note to the paper of C. S. SmithGoogle Scholar
- 8.Mullins WW (1956) J Appl Phys 27:900CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 9.MacPherson RD, Srolovitz DJ (2007) Nature 446:1053PubMedCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 10.Thornton K, Agren J, Voorhees PW (2003) Acta Mater 51:5675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Chen L-Q (2002) Annu Rev Mater Res 32:113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Gururajan MP, McKenna IM, Voorhees PW (2008) Manuscript in preparationGoogle Scholar
- 13.Chen LQ, Yang W (1994) Phys Rev B 50:15752CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 14.Chen L-Q, Wang Y (1996) J Mater 48(12):13Google Scholar
- 15.Abinandanan TA, Haider F (2001) Philos Mag A 81(10):2457CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 16.Fan D, Geng C, Chen L-Q (1997) Acta Mater 45(3):1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Fan D, Chen L-Q, Chen SP (1997) Mater Sci Eng A 238:78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.McKenna IM, Gururajan MP, Voorhees PW (2008) Manuscript in preparationGoogle Scholar
- 19.Gruber J, Ma N, Wang Y, Rollett AD, Rohrer GS (2006) Model Simulat Mater Sci Eng 14:1189CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 20.Vedantam S, Patnaik BSV (2006) Phys Rev E 73:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Kim SG, Kim DI, Kim WT, Park YB (2006) Phys Rev E 74(061605):1MATHGoogle Scholar
- 22.Vanherpe L, Moelans N, Blanpain B, Vandewalle S (2007) Phys Rev E 76(056702):1Google Scholar
- 23.McKenna IM, Ma N, Gururajan MP, Wang Y, Voorhees PW (2008) Manuscript in preparationGoogle Scholar
- 24.Allen SM, Cahn JW (1979) Acta Metall 27:1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (1992) Numerical recipes in Fortran, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeMATHGoogle Scholar
- 26.Fan D, Chen L-Q (1997) Philos Mag Lett 75(4):187CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 27.Cahn JW, Hilliard JE (1958) J Chem Phys 28(2):258CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar