Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 44, Issue 8, pp 2069–2078 | Cite as

N-chloramide modified Nomex® as a regenerable self-decontaminating material for protection against chemical warfare agents

  • Bruce SalterEmail author
  • Jeffery OwensEmail author
  • Ryan Hayn
  • Rashelle McDonald
  • Eileen Shannon


Recent interest in the treatment of textiles for chemical and biological agent defense has led to the creation of materials that contain N-chloramide moieties. These materials have demonstrated efficacy against weaponizable bacteria, mustard, and VX, as well as possessing antimicrobial properties against nuisance organisms that cause conditions such as athlete’s foot or molds. Here, N-chloramides have been attached to Nomex® intended for use as self-decontaminating regenerable military textiles. The materials were assayed for content of active oxidizing agent, and tested for efficacy against 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide and Demeton-S, simulants for mustard and VX, respectively. The decomposition products for each reaction were identified as well as reaction pathways to form each by-product as correlated to analogous products of mustard and VX. Furthermore, the rate constant for the neutralization of each simulant on the reactive material was calculated from data collected by GC-MS and ATR-FTIR real-time studies.


Nerve Agent Hydantoin Sulfur Mustard Chemical Warfare Agent Challenge Application 



The authors would like to thank Bob Nichols for his design and construction of the permeation test cell, Patrick Sullivan for his assistance in developing the temperature and RH control system, Brenton Stone for development of LabVIEW® control software, Joe Wander for technical advice, Warwick Mills for providing Nomex® textiles, the Army Natick Soldier RD&E Center, and the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) for funding this project.


  1. 1.
    Cornwell J (2003) Hitler’s Scientists. Penguin Group (USA) Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    The Use of RH-195 for the Decontamination of HS and M-1, AD222734, Naval Research Lab, Washington DC (1942), unclassifiedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reaction between Demustardizing Agent RH-195 and L, ADB966281, Chemical Corps Technical Command Army Chemical Center (1945), unclassifiedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shih ML, Korte WD, Smith JR, Szafraniec LL (1999) J Appl Toxicol 19:S89–S95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Worley SD, Sun Y (1996) Trends Polym Sci 4:364Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Akdag A, Liang J, Worley SD (2007) Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat Elem 182:1525–1533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Braue EH (1999) J Appl Toxicol 19:S47–S53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sun Y, Sun G (2004) Ind Eng Chem Res 43:5015–5020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Luo J, Sun Y (2008) Ind Eng Chem Res 47:5291–5297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Qian L, Sun G (2003) J Appl Polym Sci 89:2418–2425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Qian L, Sun G (2004) J Appl Polym Sci 91:2588–2593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen Y, Worley SD, Huang TS, Weese J, Kim J, Wei C-I, Williams JF (2004) J Appl Polym Sci 92:368–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pechura CM, Rall DP (eds) (1993) Health effects of sulfur mustard and Lewisite, Veterans at risk, Chap 5. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 71–80Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Voronstov AV, Lion C, Savinov EN, Smirniotis PG (2003) J Catal 220:414–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Martyanov IN, Klabunde KJ (2003) Environ Sci Technol 37:3448–3453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ringenbach CR, Livingston SR, Kumar DR, Landry CC (2005) Chem Mater 17:5580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yang Y, Baker JA, Ward JR (1992) Chem Rev 92:1729–1743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yang Y (1999) Acc Chem Res 32:109–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yang Y, Szafraniec LL, Beaudry WT, Rohrbaugh DK (1990) J Am Chem Soc 112:6621–6627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    The Hague Council, Demeton: health-based reassessment of administrative occupational exposure limits, Committee on Updating of Occupational Exposure Limits, a committee of the Health Council of the Netherlands, September 2003Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Munro NB, Talmage SS, Griffin GD, Waters LC, Watson AP, King JF, Hauschild V (1999) Environ Health Perspect 107(12):933–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Army Field Manual No. 3–9, Navy Publication No. P-467, Air Force Manual No. 355–7. Potential Military Chemical/Biological Agents and Compounds; Headquarters, Department of the Army; Department of the Navy; Department of the Air Force: Washington, DC, 12 December 1975; Appendix BGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Air Force Research Laboratories, Tyndall AFBPanama CityUSA
  2. 2.Applied Research Associates Inc. (ARA)AlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations