Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 43, Issue 23–24, pp 7397–7402 | Cite as

Property optimization of nanostructured ARB-processed Al by post-process deformation

  • X. HuangEmail author
  • N. Kamikawa
  • N. Hansen
Ultrafine-Grained Materials


The effect of post-process deformation on the mechanical properties of nanostructured aluminum (99.2% purity) has been investigated by cold rolling of samples which have been processed by accumulative roll bonding (ARB) to a strain of εvM = 4.8. Samples have been cold rolled to 10, 15, and 50% reductions and ultimate tensile strength (UTS), yield stress and elongation have been determined by tensile testing at room temperature. The mechanical testing shows that cold rolling to low strains (10% and 15%) leads to softening and increase in elongation compared to the as-processed ARB material. In contrary, cold rolling to large strain (50%) results in significant strengthening. This leads to the suggestion of a transition strain within the range of 25–35% reduction by rolling. The microstructural evolution during post-process deformation has been followed by transmission electron microscopy showing a significant change in the dislocation structure when the strain is increased. Based on the experimental observations the mechanical behavior is related to the structural changes focusing on the characteristics of the dislocation structure present between the narrowly spaced lamellar boundaries in the deformed structure.


Dislocation Density Cold Rolling Accumulative Roll Bonding High Angle Boundary Nanostructured Metal 



We acknowledge the Danish National Research Foundation for supporting the Center for Fundamental Research: Metal Structures in Four Dimensions, within which this work was performed.


  1. 1.
    Hughes DA, Hansen N (2000) Acta Mater 48:2985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu Q, Huang X, Lloyd DJ, Hansen N (2002) Acta Mater 53:3789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mishin OV, Juul Jensen D, Hansen N (2003) Mater Sci Eng A 342:320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cabibbo M, Blum W, Evangelista E, Kassner ME, Meyers MA (2007) Metall Mater Trans A 39A:181Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wu XL, Ma E (2006) Appl Phys Lett 88:231911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhao YH, Zhu YT, Liao XZ, Horita Z, Langdon TG (2006) Appl Phys Lett 89:121906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhao YH, Bingert JF, Liao XZ, Cui BZ, Sergueeva AV, Mukherjee AK, Valiev RZ, Langdon TG, Zhu YT (2006) Adv Mater 18:2949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huang X (2007) J Mater Sci 42:1577. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhao YH, Bingert JF, Zhu YT, Liao XZ, Valiev RZ, Horita Z, Langdon TG, Zhou YZ, Lavernia EJ (2008) Appl Phys Lett 92:081903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hansen N (2004) Scr Mater 51:801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hansen N, Huang X, Hughes DA (2001) Mater Sci Eng A 317:3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huang X, Kamikawa N, Hansen N (2008) Mater Sci Eng. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ma E (2003) Scr Mater 49:663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huang X, Hansen N, Tsuji N (2006) Science 312:249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huang X, Kamikawa N, Hansen N (2008) Mater Sci Eng 483–484:102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kamikawa N, Sakai T, Tsuji N (2007) Acta Mater 55:5873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Winther G, Huang X, Godfrey A, Hansen N (2004) Acta Mater 52:4437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liu Q (1995) Ultramicroscopy 60:81CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Fundamental Research: Metal Structures in Four Dimensions, Materials Research Department, Risø National Laboratory for Sustainable EnergyTechnical University of DenmarkRoskildeDenmark

Personalised recommendations