Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 43, Issue 12, pp 4323–4329 | Cite as

Atomic force microscopy for the measurement of flexibility of single softwood pulp fibres

  • N. Navaranjan
  • R. J. Blaikie
  • A. N. Parbhu
  • J. D. Richardson
  • A. R. Dickson
Article

Abstract

A new method based on the atomic force microscope has been developed to measure the lateral flexibility of single wood pulp fibres. In this method, individual wet pulp fibres from earlywood and latewood of Pinus radiata were placed on a newly designed two-point support, and the load and the deflection of fibres were measured under three-point bending test using a modified cantilever probe. The lateral flexibility values of the fibres were then calculated using propped cantilever beam theory. The results obtained indicate that earlywood fibres are substantially more flexible, and have a greater range of flexibility values than latewood fibres.

Keywords

Atomic Force Microscope Bacterial Cellulose Pulp Fibre Flexibility Measurement Cantilever Deflection 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Dr. John Smaill of the Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, for his support in preparation of the grooved glass slide. We would also like to thank Dr. Lloyd Donaldson and John Lloyd of Scion, Rotorua, New Zealand, for the SEM micrograph of the beaded cantilever probe and advice with the kraft pulping, respectively.

References

  1. 1.
    Wojcikiewicz EP, Zhang X, Moy VT (2004) Biological procedures online 6(1). https://doi.org/www.biologicalprocedures.com. Medline. doi: https://doi.org/10.1251/bpo67
  2. 2.
    Guhados G, Wankei W, Hutter JL (2005) J Am Chem Soc 21:6642. Published online: https://doi.org/pubs.acs.org/cgi-bin/abstract.cgi/langd5/2005/21/i14/abs/la0504311.html
  3. 3.
    Pang L, Gray DG (1998) J Pulp Paper Sci 24(11):369Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nilsson B, Wagberg L, Gray D (2001) Conformability of wet pulp fibres at small length scales. 12th Fundamental research symposium, Oxford, September 2001. p 211Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lawryshyn YA, Kuhn DCS (1996) J Pulp Paper Sci 22(11):423Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Steadman RK, Young JH (1972) Paper Technol 10(10):311Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tam Doo PA, Kerekes RJ (1982) Pulp Paper Can 83(2):T37Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kuhn DCS, Lu X, Olson JA, Robertson AG (1995) J Pulp Paper Sci 21(10):337Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kibblewhite RP, Riddell MJC, Sherman LO (2004). Fibre length and wood colour variation in three radiata pine discs having varying level of compression wood. Proceeding, 58th Appita Annual Conference, Canberra, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gere JM, Timoshenko SP (1995) Mechanics of materials, 3rd SI edition. Chapman & Hall, NYGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Instruction Manual (1997) Dimension 3100 scanning probe microscope. Veeco Digital InstrumentsGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Waterhouse JF, Page DH (2004) Nord Pulp Paper Res 19(1):89. doi: https://doi.org/10.3183/NPPRJ-2004-19-01-p089-092 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Navaranjan
    • 1
  • R. J. Blaikie
    • 2
  • A. N. Parbhu
    • 3
  • J. D. Richardson
    • 1
  • A. R. Dickson
    • 1
  1. 1.Papro, ScionRotoruaNew Zealand
  2. 2.The MacDiarmid InstituteUniversity of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand
  3. 3.Industrial Research LimitedLower HuttNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations