Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 43, Issue 10, pp 3400–3407 | Cite as

Structure and mechanical properties of gradient coatings deposited by PVD technology onto the X40CrMoV5-1 steel substrate

  • K. Lukaszkowicz
  • L. A. Dobrzański
NanoSmat 2007 - International Conference on Surfaces, Coatings and Nanostructured Materials


This paper presents the research results on the structure and mechanical properties of gradient coatings deposited by PVD methods on the X40CrMoV5-1 steel substrate. The tests were carried out on TiAlN, TiCN and AlSiCrN coatings. It was found that the structure of the PVD coatings consisted of fine crystallites, while their average size fitted within the range of 15–50 nm, depending on the coating type. The coatings demonstrated columnar structure as well as good adherence to the substrate, the latter not only being the effect of adhesion but also by the transition zone between the coating and the substrate, developed as a result of diffusion and high-energy ion action that caused mixing of the elements in the interface zone. The critical load L C2 lies within the range of 46–59 N, depending on the coating type. The TiAlN coatings demonstrate the highest hardness and abrasive wear resistance. The good properties of the PVD gradient coatings make them suitable in various engineering and industrial applications.


Acoustic Emission Critical Load Abrasive Wear Scratch Test TiAlN Coating 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Dobrzanski LA, Mazurkiewicz J, Hhajduczej E (2004) J Mater Process Technol 157–158:472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dobrzanski LA, Matula G, Varez A, Levenfeld B, Torralba JM (2004) J Mater Process Technol 157–158:658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Klimpel A, Janicki D, Klimpel AS, Rzeznikiewicz A (2007) J Achieve Mater Manuf Eng 20:37Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Karpov LP (2003) Met Sci Heat Treat 45:8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dobrzanski LA, Lukaszkowicz K (2004) J Mater Process Technol 157–158:317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Voevodin AA, Zabinski JS, Muratore C (2005) Tsinghua Sci Technol 10:665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dahan I, Admon U, Frage N, Sariel J, Dariel MP, Moore JJ (2001) Surf Coat Technol 137:111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ssculz U, Peters M, Bach FW, Tegeder G (2003) Mater Sci Eng 362:61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Movchan BA, Marinski GS (1998) Surf Coat Technol 100–101:309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guo H, Bi X, Gong S, Xu H (2001) Scripta Materialia 44:683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dobrzanski A, Matula G, Herranz G, Varez A, Levenfeld B, Torralba JM (2006) J Mater Process Technol 175:173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Burnett PJ, Rickerby DS (1987) Thin Solid Films 154:403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bellido-Gonzalez V, Stefnopoulos N, Deguilhen F (1995) Surf Coat Technol 74–75:884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sergici AO, Randall NX (2006) Adv Mat Process 4:1Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    He Y, Apachitei I, Zhou J, Walstock T, Duszczyk J (2006) Surf Coat Technol 201:2534CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Engineering Materials and BiomaterialsSilesian University of TechnologyGliwicePoland

Personalised recommendations