Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 43, Issue 12, pp 4001–4008 | Cite as

Mechanical assessment of autogenous gas tungsten arc weldments of a super alpha-2 alloy

  • H. Abaszadeh
  • S. F. Kashani BozorgEmail author
Rees Rawlings Festschrift


Butt welding of a 2-mm-thick super alpha-2 alloy (Ti-23Al-9Nb-2Mo-0.9Si) was carried out employing autogenous gas tungsten arc technique. Process parameters were adjusted to achieve full-penetration weld. Only β-Ti-based phase was detected in the fusion zone; however, minor quantities of a Ti3Al-based structure were found at heat input higher than 518 J mm−1. No cracking was observed within the fusion zone and its associated heat-affected zones. Subgrain boundaries and acicular transformation products were observed within the HAZ grains. The acicular transformation products are believed to be responsible for the higher microhardness value of the HAZ compared to those of the fusion zone and base material. It was found that the fusion zone and HAZ had lower strength and ductility than the base material. Fracture occurred within the HAZ, which is attributed to its higher microhardness value and acicular transformed microstructure. The maximum weld tensile strength achieved was about 90% of that of the base material.


Welding Heat Input Fusion Zone Cleavage Fracture Titanium Aluminide 



Thanks are to Dr. S. Kerry of DRA Farnborough, England, for providing the base material and to University of Tehran for financial support for the present research.


  1. 1.
    Ward CH, Chand SJ, Balsone (1991) In: Kim YW, Boyer RR (eds) Microstructure/property relationships in titanium aluminides and alloys. The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, pp 373Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ward CH (1993) Int Mater Rev 38(2):79rfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kerry S, Winstone MR (1995) Mat Sci Eng A 192/193:856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kerry S et al (1993) United States Patent 5,183,635, Titanium AlloysGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim YW, Froes FH (1990) In: Whange SH et al (eds) High temperature aluminides and intermetallics. TMS, pp 465Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baeslack WA ΙΙΙ, Cieslak MJ, Headley TJ (1988) Scripta Met 22:1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Martin GS, Albright CE, Jones TA (1995) Weld Res Suppl 77s–82sGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    David SA, Horton JA, Goodwin GM, Phillips DH, Reed RW (1990) Weld J 69:133sGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jicai F, Huiqiang W, Jingshan H, Bingang Z (2005) Mater Char 54:99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wu AP, Zou GS, Ren JL, Zhang HJ, Wang GQ, Liu X, Xie MR (2002) Intermetallics 10:647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Acoff VL, Thompson RG, Griffin RD, Radhakrishnan B (1992) Mat Sci Eng A152:304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    ASM Handbook (1993) Weld Braz Solder 6:12Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mridha S, Ng BS (1999) Surf Eng 15:210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Banerjee D, Gogia AK, Nandi TK, Joshi VA (1998) Acta Metal 36(4):871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Baeslack WA ΙΙΙ, Becker DW, Froes FH (1984) J Metal 36(5):46Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Easterling K (1992) In: Butterworth-Heinemann (ed) Introduction to the physical metallurgy of welding, 2nd Oxford, p 82Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baeslack WA III, Broderick T (1990) Effect of cooling rate on the structure and hardness of a Ti–26 at.%Al–10 at.%Nb–3 at.% V–1 at.% Mo titanium aluminide. Scr Metall 24(2):319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cieslack MMJ, Headley WA, Baeslack TJ III (1990) Met Trans A 21A:1273CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of TehranTehranIran

Personalised recommendations