Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 43, Issue 4, pp 1311–1317 | Cite as

Quantification of dislocations in hemp fibers using acid hydrolysis and fiber segment length distributions

  • Lisbeth G. ThygesenEmail author
Article

Abstract

Natural fibers such as flax or hemp may be used in composite materials. However, their use for this purpose is hampered by the large natural variation in tensile strength and other quality parameters. The first step in managing these variations is to develop methods for fast and reliable determination of relevant parameters. One quality parameter of the fibers is the amount of structural distortions known as dislocations or kink bands. Here, a method developed for the quantification of dislocations in pulp fibers was adapted and tested successfully for hemp yarn segments. The method is based on acid hydrolysis and subsequent determination of the fiber segment length distribution. The premise of the method is that acid hydrolysis causes fibers to break in the dislocations rather than in other places. By use of polarized light microscopy and image analysis it was found that the premise was correct, and furthermore results showed that fibers broke more often in large dislocations than in small ones. However, it was also found that the hemp fiber segments did not break in all dislocations, and strict standardization of the procedure for acid hydrolysis is therefore necessary if results from different batches of fibers are to be compared.

Keywords

Acid Hydrolysis Length Distribution Hemp Natural Fiber Pulp Fiber 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank Paul Ander for helpful discussions regarding his method and Elisabeth Björk for access to the raw data output from the FiberMaster in addition to the standard result files. Ann Marklund is thanked for the Kajaani measurements. Ulla Gjøl Jacobsen’s laboratory assistance and Bo Madsen’s donation of the hemp yarn is much appreciated. This study was initiated within the project ‘High performance hemp fibers and improved fiber network for composites’ financed by the Danish Research Council. Most of the work reported here was carried out at the Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark.

References

  1. 1.
    Nyholm K, Ander P, Bardage S, Daniel G (2001) Nord Pulp Pap Res J 4:374Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Terziev N, Daniel G, Marklund A (2005) Holzforschung 59:163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davies GC, Bruce DM (1998) Tex Res J 68:623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hughes M, Sèbe G, Hague J, Hill C, Spear M, Mott L (2000) Compos Interface 7:13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bos HL, Van Den Oever MJA, Peters OCJJ (2002) J Mater Sci 37:1683. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014925621252 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lamy B, Pomel C (2002) J Mater Sci Lett 21:1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baley C (2004) J Mater Sci 39:331. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000007768.63055.ae
  8. 8.
    Thygesen LG, Eder M, Burgert I (2007) J Mater Sci 42:558. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-1113-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ander P, Marklund A, WURC report no. 4 (2003) ISBN 91-576-6647-4, available from P. Ander, Department of Wood Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7008, SE-75007 Uppsala, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ander P, Daniel G (2004) In: Stanzl-Tschegg SE, Gindl M, Sinn G (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on wood machining, Vienna, July 2004, BOKU, Vienna, p 247Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ander P, Daniel G (2004) In: Proceedings of the 8th European workshop on lignocellulosis and pulp, Riga, August 2004, Latvian Institute of Wood Chemistry, p 49Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ander P, Daniel G (2004) In: Schmitt U, Ander P, Barnett J, Emons AM, Jeronimidis G, Saranpää P, Tschegg S (eds) Wood fiber cell walls: methods to study their formation, structure and properties, SLU, Uppsala, p 203Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ander P, Daniel G, Garcia-Lindgren C, Marklund A (2005) Nord Pulp Pap Res J 20:84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Karlsson H, Franson P-I, Mohlin U-B (1999) In: Proceedings from the 6th International conference on new available technologies, Stockholm, 1999, SPCI, Stockholm, p 367Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thygesen LG, Ander P (2005) Nord Pulp Pap Res J 20:64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Forest & landscapeUniversity of CopenhagenFrederiksberg CDenmark

Personalised recommendations