Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 43, Issue 11, pp 3960–3968 | Cite as

First principles study of the adhesion asymmetry of a metal/oxide interface

  • C. L. Phillips
  • P. D. BristoweEmail author
Intergranular and Interphase Boundaries in Materials

Abstract

The observed asymmetry in the interfacial adhesion between ZnO and Ag is studied using a first principles density functional approach. The interface formed when ZnO is deposited on Ag (111) is experimentally measured to be stronger than that formed when Ag is deposited on ZnO (0001) and this indicates a possible difference in bonding geometries. It is found that because the ZnO (0001) surface does not exhibit atoms which are onefold coordinated with the sub-surface layer this restricts the way Ag can bond to the surface whereas no such restriction exists, when ZnO is deposited on the Ag (111) surface. The study focuses on a particular Ag (111)/ZnO (0001) interface which has rotated epitaxy and by calculating the ideal work of separation it is found that an O-terminated interface which is onefold coordinated with an adjacent Zn layer is significantly stronger than the corresponding interface which is threefold coordinated with an adjacent Zn layer. This is consistent with the observations, since the onefold coordinated interface cannot form when Ag is deposited on to ZnO (0001). Additional calculations indicate that the stronger onefold coordinated interface can also separate leaving oxygen on the Ag surface provided that surface relaxation effects are suppressed.

Keywords

Ideal Work Volume Relaxation Translation State Instantaneous Work Mechanical Asymmetry 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding for this study was provided by EPSRC and the calculations were performed using high performance computing facilities at the University of Cambridge and at the Daresbury Laboratory. The authors would like to thank Zheshuai Lin, Steve Bull, Jinju Chen, Paul Warren and John Ridealgh for useful discussions. The work forms part of a UK Materials Modelling Consortium on Functional Coatings.

References

  1. 1.
    Glaser HJ (2000) Large area glass coating. Von Ardenne Anlagentechnik, Gmbh, DresdenGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hummel RE, Guenther KH (eds) (1995) Handbook of optical properties: thin films for optical coatings, vol 1. CRC, Boca Raton Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ridealgh JA (2006) Mat Res Soc Proc 890:39Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barthel E, Kerjan O, Nael P, Nadaud N (2005) Thin Solid Films 473:272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lin Z, Bristowe PD (2007) Phys Rev B 75:205423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arbab M (2001) Thin Solid Films 381:15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wander A, Schedin F, Steadman P, Norris A, McGrath R, Turner TS, Thornton G, Harrison NM (2001) Phys Rev Lett 86:3811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meyer B, Marx D (2003) Phys Rev B 67:035403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Meyer B (2004) Phys Rev B 69:045416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kunat M, Gil Girol St, Becker Th, Burghaus U, Woll Ch (2002) Phys Rev B 66:081402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kresse G, Dulub O, Diebold U (2003) Phys Rev B 68:245409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Matthews JW, Blakeslee AE (1974) J Cryst Growth 27:118Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Culbertson RJ, Feldman LC, Silverman PJ, Boehm H (1981) Phys Rev Lett 47:657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    de Leeuw NH, Nelson CJ (2003) J Phys Chem B 107:3528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Payne MC, Teter MP, Allan DC, Arias TA, Joannopoulos JD (1992) Rev Mod Phys 64:1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Clark SJ, Segall MD, Pickard CJ, Hasnip PJ, Probert MJ, Refson K, Payne MC (2005) Z Kristallogr 220:567Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vanderbilt D (1990) Phys Rev B 41:7892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Phys Rev Lett 77:3865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fischer TH, Almlof J (1992) J Phys Chem 96:9768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tarnow E, Dallot P, Bristowe PD, Joannopoulos JD, Francis GP, Payne MC (1990) Phys Rev B 42:3644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Meyer B, Marx D (2004) Phys Rev B 69:235420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Finnis MW (1996) J Phys: Condens Matter 8:5811Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li WX, Stampfl C, Scheffler M (2002) Phys Rev B 65:075407CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and MetallurgyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations