Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 42, Issue 18, pp 7977–7980 | Cite as

A model to explain extensive superplasticity in polycrystalline materials

  • Yan Dong
  • Zhonghua LiEmail author
  • Jun Sun

Superplastic behavior has been observed in a variety of metallic systems during high temperature deformation. The possibility of superplastic flow in nanocrystalline materials at low temperatures is reported in molecular-dynamics simulations [1, 2] and in experimental evidences [3, 4, 5, 6]. Karch et al. [3] observed that conventional brittle ceramics became ductile at low temperature if a polycrystalline ceramics was generated with a crystal size of a few nm. Lu et al. [4] showed recently that bulk, highly pure nanocrystalline copper could be strained at room temperature by up to 5,000% without strain hardening and changing grain size. These experimental results indicate that conventional dislocation mechanisms are not responsible for the large strain and that the extensive superplasticity seems to originate from grain boundary (GB) diffusion (Coble creep). This novel behavior, however, could not be explained by present models and theories.

Lee [ 7] proposed a model to show grain...


Grain Boundary Polycrystalline Material Nanocrystalline Material Diffusion Creep Average Strain Rate 



This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China under Grant No.10572088 and the National Basic Research Program of China through Grant No. 2004CB619303.


  1. 1.
    Schiotz J, Tolla FD, Jacobsen KW (1998) Nature 391:561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yamakov V, Wolf D, Phillpot RR, Gleider H (2002) Acta Mater 50:61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Karch J, Birringer R, Gleider H (1987) Nature 330:556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lu L, Sui ML, Lu K (2000) Science 287:1463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chinh NQ, Szommer P, Horita Z, Langdon TG (2006) Adv Mater 18:34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xu X, Nishimura T, Hirosaki N, Xie RJ, Yamamoto Y, Tanaka H (2006) Acta Mater 54:255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee D (1970) Metall Trans 1:309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Spingarn JR, Nix WD (1978) Acta Metall 26:1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Coble RL (1963) J Appl Phys 34:1679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Green HW (1970) J Appl Phys 41:3899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kitimura T, Ohtani R, Yamanaka T, Hattori Y (1995) JSME Int J 38:581Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Suo Z (1997) Adv Appl Mech 33:194Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang JN (2000) Acta Metall 48:1517Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yang W, Ma X, Wang H, Hong W (2004) Key Eng Mater 274–276:51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rodriguez AD, Garcia DG, Solvas EZ, Shen J, Chaim R (2007) Scripta Materialia 56:89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Naziri H, Pearce R, Brown MH, Hale VF (1973) J Microsc 97:229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ashby MF, Verrall R (1973) Acta Metall 21:149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim BN, Hiraga K (2000) Acta Mater 48:4151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ford JM, Wheeler J, Movchan AB (2000) Acta Mater 50:3941CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Engineering MechanicsShanghai Jiaotong UniversityShanghaiP.R. China
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory for Mechanical Behavior of Materials, School of Materials Science and EngineeringXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anP.R. China

Personalised recommendations