Effect of current stressing on the reliability of 63Sn37Pb solder joints
- 110 Downloads
- 7 Citations
Abstract
The effect of current stressing on the reliability of 63Sn37Pb solder joints with Cu pads was investigated at temperatures of −5 °C and 125 °C up to 600 h. The samples were stressed with 3 A current (6.0 × 102 A/cm2 in the solder joint with diameter of 800 μm and 1.7 × 104 A/cm2 in the Cu trace with cross section area of 35 × 500 μm). The temperatures of the samples and interfacial reaction within the solder joints were examined. The microstructural change of the solder joints aged at 125 °C without current flow was also evaluated for comparison. It was confirmed that the current flow could cause the temperature of solder joints to rise rapidly and remarkably due to accumulation of massive Joule heat generated by the Cu trace. The solder joints stressed at 125 °C with 3 A current had an extensive growth of Cu6Sn5 and Cu3Sn intermetallic compounds (IMC) at both top and bottom solder-to-pad interfaces. It was a direct result of accelerated aging rather than an electromigration or thermomigration effect in this experiment. The kinetic is believed to be bulk diffusion controlled solid-state reaction, irrespective of the electron flow direction. When stressed at −5 °C with 3 A current, no significant change in microstructure and composition of the solder joints had occurred due to a very low diffusivity of the atoms as most Joule heat was eliminated at low temperature. The IMC evolution of the solder joints aged at 125 °C exhibited a subparabolic growth behavior, which is presumed to be a combined mechanism of grain boundary diffusion and bulk diffusion. This is mainly ascribed to the retardant effect against the diffusion course by the sufficiently thick IMC layer that was initially formed during the reflow soldering.
Keywords
Solder Joint Solder Ball Bulk Diffusion Joule Heat Organic Solderability PreservativeNotes
Acknowledgements
This work described herein was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China and Research Grants Council of Hong Kong Joint Research Scheme (Project No. N_CityU103/03). The authors wish to thank Prof. and Mrs. B. Ralph at Brunel, UK and Mr. C. W. Tan at Photonics Manufacturing Services (Shenzhen) in P.R. China.
References
- 1.Brandenburg S, Yeh S, in Proceedings of the Surface Mount International Conference and Exhibition, SMI98, San Jose, CA, August (SMTA, Edina, MN, 1998), p 337Google Scholar
- 2.Tu KN (2003) J Appl Phys 94:5451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Lee TY, Tu KN (2001) J Appl Phy 90:4502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Tang Z, Shi FG (2001) Microelectron J 32:605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Rinne GA (2003) Microelectron Reliab 43:1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Hsu YC, Shao TL, Yang CJ, Chen C (2003) J Electron Mate l32:1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Nah JW, Kim JH, Lee HM, Paik KW (2004) Acta Mater 52:129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Ye H, Basaran C, Hopkins DC (2003) Int J Solids Struct 40:4021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Kumar A, He M, Chen Z, Teo PS (2004) Thin Solid Films 462–463:413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Everett YCC, Choi WJ, Tu KN (2002) Appl Phys Lett 80:580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Lai YS, Kao CL (2006) Electrothermal coupling analysis of current crowding and Joule heating in flip-chip packages. Microelectron Reliab, In Press, Available online 10 January 2006Google Scholar
- 12.Wu JD, Zheng PJ, Lee CW, Hung SC, Lee JJ (2006) Microelectron and Reliab 46:41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Chiew HT (2004) Effect of Ni and Cu additive on electromigration in Sn solder joints and lines. Master Thesis, Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, National Central University Chung-Li, Taiwan, June, 2004Google Scholar
- 14.Liu YH, Lin KL (2005) J Mater Res 20:2184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Chen SW, Chen CM (2003) JOM-J Mineral Metal Mater Soc 55:62Google Scholar
- 16.Hu YC, Lin YH, Kao CR (2003) J Mater Res 18:2544Google Scholar
- 17.Alam MO, Wu BY, Chan YC, Tu KN (2006) Acta Mater 54:613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Ye H, Basaran C, Hopkins D (2004) Int J Solid Struct 41:2743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Roush W, Jaspal J (1982) In: Proceedings of the 32nd Electronic Components Conference, San Diego, CA, vol. 32, pp. 342–345Google Scholar
- 20.Ye H, Basaran C, Hopkins DC (2003) Appl Phys Lett 82:1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Huang AT, Gusak AM, Tu KN (2006) Appl Phys Lett 88, 141911:1–3Google Scholar
- 22.Lin YH, Tsai CM, Hu YC, Lin YL, Kao CR (2005) J Electron Mater 34:27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Wu BY, Chan YC (2005) J Alloys Compds 392:237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Mei Z, Sunwoo A, Morris JW (1992) Metallur Trans A 23A:857Google Scholar
- 25.Jung K, Conrad H (2001) J Electron Mater 30:1038Google Scholar
- 26.Roming AD, Chang JRYA, Stephens JJ, Frear DR, Marcotte V, Lea C (1991) In: Frear DR, Jones WJ, Kinsman KR (eds) Solder mechanics-A state of the art assessment. The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, Warrendale, PA, USA, p 54Google Scholar
- 27.Parkash KH, Sritharan T (2003) J Electron Mater 32:939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Ghosh G (2000) Acta Mater 48:3719CrossRefGoogle Scholar